Not sure about the lack of skill. It doesn't have the pace or power but the intricacy of passing is better for it. Keira Walsh is a proper baller.
Might sound weird but I think I aspire to play football like the england women's team more than mens. Slide rule passes give me the horn though
Agree...some of the skill regards....1st touch, quick short passing and lightness of feet is up there with the men, in some ways better.
Think it's the lighter bodyweight and lightness of touch that makes control easier and more natural for women who have trained working on technical skills.
Some men are muscle bound "big beast" athletes, so you would imagine they'd have difficulty having a light touch and quick feet.
That's one example where the perceived physical weaknesses of women are actually an advantage.
The Spanish women last night were, at times knocking it around like the mens team of Barcelona.
However let's not forget they aren't being closed down as quickly and have more space to perform.
Still entertaining though, some of the passing is nearer Man City standard than Sheff United standard.
However before anyone takes offence I'm not suggesting that it's better overall. Football is more a physical game than a game of skill, so a team of average players with strength, speed and power will always beat a team of physically weak players with more skill. Obviously the physical levels of men are on a totally different level.
Also still have doubts about the keepers, still seem surprisingly weak.
England's brilliant winning goal was hit fairly central, no way near the corner of the goal but still went in. Seemed obvious to me but this wasn't mentioned on TV.
It made me wonder if I'd have been the Spanish keeper I think I'd have done better to save it.
I'm just over 6 foot and think anything hit centrally with height I would either push it into the roof of the net or push it over the bar.