Kevin Gage Posted This what a Tool He is

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




Warnock got him sacked when he slagged him off while working as a match day host
hes a typical little Englander from his politics to his views on BLM/lockdown/masks/vaccinations
blokes a full weight prick
Oh look, another soyboy who gets upset that others have opposing views to him.
You're truly pathetic and I'm sure you already know that your parents are ashamed of you.
 
Oh look, another soyboy who gets upset that others have opposing views to him.
You're truly pathetic and I'm sure you already know that your parents are ashamed of you.

Criticising people getting upset about opposing views whilst simultaneously being abusive about people having opposing views. 👀
 

Don't get what the issue is with this.
The vaccine is supposed to protect someone from potentially being hospitalised by corona. It apparently doesn't stop transmission, so surely it's down to the individual to decide if they feel the need to reduce the risk.
A lot has been said about people having no symptoms, even when testing positive and for the majority of the world, there is a 99.7%+ survival rate, so I'm not entirely sure this vaccine is necessary for most people, therefore vaccine passports should not be used anywhere.
If could understand if the vaccine prevented transmission, but it doesn't, so there's no point.
 
Don't get what the issue is with this.
The vaccine is supposed to protect someone from potentially being hospitalised by corona. It apparently doesn't stop transmission, so surely it's down to the individual to decide if they feel the need to reduce the risk.
A lot has been said about people having no symptoms, even when testing positive and for the majority of the world, there is a 99.7%+ survival rate, so I'm not entirely sure this vaccine is necessary for most people, therefore vaccine passports should not be used anywhere.
If could understand if the vaccine prevented transmission, but it doesn't, so there's no point.
There speaks the top virologist in the country
 



Don't get what the issue is with this.
The vaccine is supposed to protect someone from potentially being hospitalised by corona. It apparently doesn't stop transmission, so surely it's down to the individual to decide if they feel the need to reduce the risk.
A lot has been said about people having no symptoms, even when testing positive and for the majority of the world, there is a 99.7%+ survival rate, so I'm not entirely sure this vaccine is necessary for most people, therefore vaccine passports should not be used anywhere.
If could understand if the vaccine prevented transmission, but it doesn't, so there's no point.
Think you will find it vastly reduces transmission , multiple studies done
 
Don't get what the issue is with this.
The vaccine is supposed to protect someone from potentially being hospitalised by corona. It apparently doesn't stop transmission, so surely it's down to the individual to decide if they feel the need to reduce the risk.
A lot has been said about people having no symptoms, even when testing positive and for the majority of the world, there is a 99.7%+ survival rate, so I'm not entirely sure this vaccine is necessary for most people, therefore vaccine passports should not be used anywhere.
If could understand if the vaccine prevented transmission, but it doesn't, so there's no point.
 
The first paragraph from the link above:

A single dose of Pfizer-BioNTech’s coronavirus vaccine cuts the number of asymptomatic infections and could significantly reduce the risk of transmission, a new UK study suggests.

Whenever I'm looking for clear cut analysis, I always try to avoid the words 'Could, Might, Possibly' etc, as this isn't significant proof, it's pure speculation.

The first paragraph is as much as I need to read from that.
 
The first paragraph from the link above:

A single dose of Pfizer-BioNTech’s coronavirus vaccine cuts the number of asymptomatic infections and could significantly reduce the risk of transmission, a new UK study suggests.

Whenever I'm looking for clear cut analysis, I always try to avoid the words 'Could, Might, Possibly' etc, as this isn't significant proof, it's pure speculation.

The first paragraph is as much as I need to read from that.
It's pretty straight forward if it ruduces infection ,it's logic that there is less transmission .
 
The first paragraph from the link above:

A single dose of Pfizer-BioNTech’s coronavirus vaccine cuts the number of asymptomatic infections and could significantly reduce the risk of transmission, a new UK study suggests.

Whenever I'm looking for clear cut analysis, I always try to avoid the words 'Could, Might, Possibly' etc, as this isn't significant proof, it's pure speculation.

The first paragraph is as much as I need to read from that.

It's simple, really. Based on the early data, from the first two months of vaccination, the evidence suggests that vaccination reduces transmission as well as protecting the individual. More evidence will be needed as more data is available. Obviously, new variants might change things, but this is what the available early evidence suggests.

On the other hand, if your view is that vaccination doesn't have any effect on transmission, you might like to cite some evidence to support that view. Otherwise you're speculating.
 
It's simple, really. Based on the early data, from the first two months of vaccination, the evidence suggests that vaccination reduces transmission as well as protecting the individual. More evidence will be needed as more data is available. Obviously, new variants might change things, but this is what the available early evidence suggests.

On the other hand, if your view is that vaccination doesn't have any effect on transmission, you might like to cite some evidence to support that view. Otherwise you're speculating.
Why do you feel the need to vaccinate yourself against a virus that carries a 99.7%+ survival rate?
Is it to 'save the nhs?'.
The Nightingale hospital was closed down before it even opened, at the height of this drama.
People get flu, pass it on and all recover.
People will get corona, pass it on and all recover/survive.
Quite simple logic.
Now I'm sure there are some people who suffer from 'long - flu' and suffer for an unusual amount of time, just like 'some' people get this term 'long - covid'.
The majority of the world's population are at no risk whatsoever - fact.
 
Why do you feel the need to vaccinate yourself against a virus that carries a 99.7%+ survival rate?
Is it to 'save the nhs?'.
The Nightingale hospital was closed down before it even opened, at the height of this drama.
People get flu, pass it on and all recover.
People will get corona, pass it on and all recover/survive.
Quite simple logic.
Now I'm sure there are some people who suffer from 'long - flu' and suffer for an unusual amount of time, just like 'some' people get this term 'long - covid'.
The majority of the world's population are at no risk whatsoever - fact.

Jesus wept.
 



Why do you feel the need to vaccinate yourself against a virus that carries a 99.7%+ survival rate?
Is it to 'save the nhs?'.
The Nightingale hospital was closed down before it even opened, at the height of this drama.
People get flu, pass it on and all recover.
People will get corona, pass it on and all recover/survive.
Quite simple logic.
Now I'm sure there are some people who suffer from 'long - flu' and suffer for an unusual amount of time, just like 'some' people get this term 'long - covid'.
The majority of the world's population are at no risk whatsoever - fact.
I asked you for evidence on the point about transmission and you changed the subject. Anyway, your post tells me there's no point arguing with you, so I'll leave it there.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom