blademark
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2009
- Messages
- 3,755
- Reaction score
- 6,400
Just behind Brewdog . Fairly obvious really.But where would he play in our formation?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Just behind Brewdog . Fairly obvious really.But where would he play in our formation?
It seems a very logical and sensible question given we’ve not changed our formation for anyone and Brooks is unproven at PL level and hasn’t shown he has recovered from his injuries to make good on his promise with us and Bournemouth.
But somehow he's been touted as a £40-50m player ?It seems a very logical and sensible question given we’ve not changed our formation for anyone and Brooks is unproven at PL level and hasn’t shown he has recovered from his injuries to make good on his promise with us and Bournemouth.
Agreed. Fleck,Berge & another in midfield. Brooks & Brewster up top. Could this happen??Just behind Brewdog . Fairly obvious really.
Absolutely this.Can we just forget the "where would he play" nonsense.
If he's available at something that works we tweak a role for him, unreal player
Sumatriptan knocks my migraines out straight away. Okay, within an hour then. I'm a bit dozy and out of it for another hour or so afterwards as well, but I'd get through 90 minutes of football, no problem.
Unused sub tonight....looks as though he may have been on the bench to make the numbers up, Bournemouth could only name 6....
Thats only cos I had a fiver on it an hour ago.Favourites now .....
He can do magicAgree...think Brooks will often produce little.....but every now and then...he’ll produce some magic to change a game....this rare quality keeps his valuation high.
However he’s what I’d call a luxury player....I think he’s probably wrong for us because he represents poor value and he’s poor without the ball.
but he’d be a great sub option for a Man Utd or Arsenal.....they can afford luxuries...and have more possession..so he’d be more suited there.
Hope I’m wrong and he remains injury free and finds some consistency.
A loan would make sense.... Bournemouth would save on his wages plus recoup a small loan payment and if Brooks can stay healthy for the year, his value would sky rocket.
It's better than I remembered!
Who cares about formations any more. Let em all goal hang.Regardless of wages and anything else, can we see Brooks being able to play in the RM role for us? It involves as much defensively as going forward and whilst he's kind of willing I don't reckon he's good enough tackling, marking or strength-wise.
That was ages ago, why make stuff like that up now?I’m pretty sure this all stems from the interview where wilder said he’d love to have the likes of brooks / DCL back but we aren’t operating in those leagues
Absolutely nothing to see here
I agree it probably does seems like some outlets have only just picked up on it but shhhhh I want to dreamI’m pretty sure this all stems from the interview where wilder said he’d love to have the likes of brooks / DCL back but we aren’t operating in those leagues
Absolutely nothing to see here
Unused sub tonight....looks as though he may have been on the bench to make the numbers up, Bournemouth could only name 6....
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?