Player Suggestion David Brooks

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


king on way to torino, brooks homesick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
It seems a very logical and sensible question given we’ve not changed our formation for anyone and Brooks is unproven at PL level and hasn’t shown he has recovered from his injuries to make good on his promise with us and Bournemouth.
But somehow he's been touted as a £40-50m player ?
 
Unused sub tonight....looks as though he may have been on the bench to make the numbers up, Bournemouth could only name 6....
 

Agree...think Brooks will often produce little.....but every now and then...he’ll produce some magic to change a game....this rare quality keeps his valuation high.
However he’s what I’d call a luxury player....I think he’s probably wrong for us because he represents poor value and he’s poor without the ball.
but he’d be a great sub option for a Man Utd or Arsenal.....they can afford luxuries...and have more possession..so he’d be more suited there.
Hope I’m wrong and he remains injury free and finds some consistency.
He can do magic
 
I reckon there's something in this, I reckon Brooks has told Bournemouth that he wants it to happen.

He looks at Henderson, Ramsdale, McBurnie, Ampadu, Bogle, Lowe, Berge and Brewster and recognises that Sheffield United is a place to go if you're a promising youngster who wants to play the right way.
 
A loan would make sense.... Bournemouth would save on his wages plus recoup a small loan payment and if Brooks can stay healthy for the year, his value would sky rocket.

Get that sell on fee pumped up.
 
Regardless of wages and anything else, can we see Brooks being able to play in the RM role for us? It involves as much defensively as going forward and whilst he's kind of willing I don't reckon he's good enough tackling, marking or strength-wise.
 
Surely this can’t be happening , can it ?
Perhaps a loan given the value that has been quoted for him .
 
Regardless of wages and anything else, can we see Brooks being able to play in the RM role for us? It involves as much defensively as going forward and whilst he's kind of willing I don't reckon he's good enough tackling, marking or strength-wise.
Who cares about formations any more. Let em all goal hang.
 
I’m pretty sure this all stems from the interview where wilder said he’d love to have the likes of brooks / DCL back but we aren’t operating in those leagues

Absolutely nothing to see here
 
I’m pretty sure this all stems from the interview where wilder said he’d love to have the likes of brooks / DCL back but we aren’t operating in those leagues

Absolutely nothing to see here
That was ages ago, why make stuff like that up now?
 
I’m pretty sure this all stems from the interview where wilder said he’d love to have the likes of brooks / DCL back but we aren’t operating in those leagues

Absolutely nothing to see here
I agree it probably does seems like some outlets have only just picked up on it but shhhhh I want to dream 😂
 

Unused sub tonight....looks as though he may have been on the bench to make the numbers up, Bournemouth could only name 6....

I only live down the road,could’ve sat on the bench for 90 mins bending Brooks ear about coming back😩🤣
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom