shorehamview
Pink Sambuca drinking World Champion.
Monty had a good game, but often the Monty haters refuse to accept that. Sure, on occasions he gave the ball away, but so did every other player in the country. Nobody has a 100% success rate, it's just that some seem to labour under the misapprehension that Monty has a zero% rate - far from it. Williamson fit may well be a better player than Monty, but Williamson fit for more than a couple of matches seems to be rarer than a unicorn in Rotherham or soap in Barnsley.
So yes, Monty is better than Williamson at the moment. If there's a better player to swap for Monty or indeed ANY of the players in our squad then let's have them in, but it's not that easy. If Fabregas fancies coming to the Lane I'd swap him for Monty like a shot, but the problem with getting any new players is getting them. I'd rather have a fit Williamson in, but that seems as likely as getting Fabregas, or even Calor Gas. Williamson is another crock signed on the off-chance that he might get fit. Warnock often signed players that did badly elsewhere in the hope that he could get them to play, but Blackwell seemed to sign crocks in the hope that his healing hands would make everything alright. A fit Monty is better than a crocked Williamson, and until Williamson is fit then I'd keep Monty in. He seems to be gelling with Britton, and I'd also keep Quinn sat on the bench at the moment, because Britton and Monty may just be the midfield pairing that will suit us best until better comes, whenever that may be.
I know Monty polarises opinion like no other, but I'm happy with him in our team until a better player comes along. That might be next week, next season or not for a year or two. So be it. It's the same with all of the squad - if we can get better then let's have them. We certainly got a better left-back than Taylor, who is enthusiastic but out of his depth.
So yes, Monty is better than Williamson at the moment. If there's a better player to swap for Monty or indeed ANY of the players in our squad then let's have them in, but it's not that easy. If Fabregas fancies coming to the Lane I'd swap him for Monty like a shot, but the problem with getting any new players is getting them. I'd rather have a fit Williamson in, but that seems as likely as getting Fabregas, or even Calor Gas. Williamson is another crock signed on the off-chance that he might get fit. Warnock often signed players that did badly elsewhere in the hope that he could get them to play, but Blackwell seemed to sign crocks in the hope that his healing hands would make everything alright. A fit Monty is better than a crocked Williamson, and until Williamson is fit then I'd keep Monty in. He seems to be gelling with Britton, and I'd also keep Quinn sat on the bench at the moment, because Britton and Monty may just be the midfield pairing that will suit us best until better comes, whenever that may be.
I know Monty polarises opinion like no other, but I'm happy with him in our team until a better player comes along. That might be next week, next season or not for a year or two. So be it. It's the same with all of the squad - if we can get better then let's have them. We certainly got a better left-back than Taylor, who is enthusiastic but out of his depth.