Two other things which make that decision ridiculous.
1 Where they’ve frozen the picture. Is that the exact instant the ball is played or is it a frame or two later? When they’re cutting it to such fine margins they have to be exact as to when the ball is actually played.
2 Apparently there was about 20 seconds from when it happened to the goal. Just how far back in play are they going to go back to find a so-called infringement. 20 seconds, a minute, 2 minutes?
its a complete and utter farce and at the end of the day it all comes down to one mans decision, except it’s not the ref actually on the pitch but some chuff sat in front of a screen rewinding and playing then rewinding again, just looking for a reason not to give a goal.
That wasn’t the idea of VAR.