Why can't we have the full bramall lane end and give away side Pukka pies corner?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




Newcastle away certainly isn't pitch level so don't know why this is a consideration?

I think that's why they have to be at pitch level now. So clubs can't stick away fans up in the gods.

From a Sky Sports story:

"Newcastle were granted a special dispensation to be excluded from a Premier League rule stating visiting fans must be housed at pitchside level"
 
There's the gap between it and the Kop, which I don't get? Maybe it's for access to some part of the Kop that needs to be checked, like the pillar, don't know but it's ugly, and if it isn't for inspection reasons, it should have butt right up against the Kop so that there'd be more useful seats.

It's just a reyt state.

Ive been in the corner stand and there’s no gap, it goes right up to the Kop.

Agree it’s not ideal but I assume the plan was to increase capacity, even if only by 900.
What would you have done? Left it blank and have a lower capacity.
If they could remove the pillar and the wall, every seat would offer a really good view up there.
 
Ive been in the corner stand and there’s no gap, it goes right up to the Kop.

Agree it’s not ideal but I assume the plan was to increase capacity, even if only by 900.
What would you have done? Left it blank and have a lower capacity.
If they could remove the pillar and the wall, every seat would offer a really good view up there.

There's a slight gap, probably only a seat or so wide and it looks like it's for roof access of the corner but that's a few more seats that aren't restricted view if there was a way to make that access from within the stand.

1280px-Streetwise_Corner.jpg

I'd have had it done properly, I unfortunately can't remember who it is on here but they worked for the firm who was beaten out by the eventual architects and apparently said architects knew they'd half arsed it and we're just happy with the cheque. Think the quote was that they'd put their C team on it or something.

I think if the JS wall could have gone any further back they would have done it when they were taking the side out to be honest. Think it's just exceptionally poorly designed.
 
10 seconds research on the seating plan disagrees.
You're obviously a lot more arsed about it than I am, then. At least some away fans in the Prem have to be seated pitchside, Newcastle have an exemption from that. Either Man United have one too, or have some fans seated pitchside.
 
You're obviously a lot more arsed about it than I am, then. At least some away fans in the Prem have to be seated pitchside, Newcastle have an exemption from that. Either Man United have one too, or have some fans seated pitchside.

Good that you don't need to actually research before writing for a living isn't it?
You should consider working for a shit failing provincial rag.
Have a lovely day.
 
Good that you don't need to actually research before writing for a living isn't it?
You should consider working for a shit failing provincial rag.
Have a lovely day.
Thanks, John. What do you do for a living?
 
Good that you don't need to actually research before writing for a living isn't it?
You should consider working for a shit failing provincial rag.
Have a lovely day.
Do you know why Newcastle get this dispensation?. St James Park will be a new ground for me next season,I do hope the lifts are working!!
 
Do you know why Newcastle get this dispensation?. St James Park will be a new ground for me next season,I do hope the lifts are working!!

A few botlles of Broon Ale and some Pease pudding and stotty cake and you'll fly up there. Might struggle with vertigo mind.
 
Divide my time between ruling the North, defeating the Night King and shagging a real fit bird who keeps dragons mate.
yeah Danny pulled that question on me when we had a brief discussion, found it amusing when I told him what I did. Of course that was what I do now as I'm retired I've also been a project manager, avionics engineer and technical author to name several other jobs in 35 years of work. Left it because it said more about him that he felt superior as a journalist!
 



“Following a number of meetings of the stadium Safety Advisory Group, the Local Authority formally agreed not to support any move of away supporters from their current location, concluding that such a relocation would introduce a significant risk to spectator safety.

Newcastle SAG got them the dispensation to avoid pitch side away fans. So SAG over rules Premier League. Expect the same level of segregation to be in place at the Lane next season, at least we may get the whole of the BLUT.
 
yeah Danny pulled that question on me when we had a brief discussion, found it amusing when I told him what I did. Of course that was what I do now as I'm retired I've also been a project manager, avionics engineer and technical author to name several other jobs in 35 years of work. Left it because it said more about him that he felt superior as a journalist!


Interesting.
I do feel he exhibits feelings of superiority in his postings as he loves to "correct" mere mortals using his privileged inside info.
He seldom actually posts as a fan and let's it all out.
Too late now. The genies out of the bottle but he chose to come out of the closet. Could have stayed there and posted with passion of and freedom like fans do.
 
“Following a number of meetings of the stadium Safety Advisory Group, the Local Authority formally agreed not to support any move of away supporters from their current location, concluding that such a relocation would introduce a significant risk to spectator safety.

Newcastle SAG got them the dispensation to avoid pitch side away fans. So SAG over rules Premier League. Expect the same level of segregation to be in place at the Lane next season, at least we may get the whole of the BLUT.
That’s the bottom corner of the TC and John Street netted off then,what’s that about 500 seats taken out of use,add in the rows above in the BLUT taken out of use for ‘safety reasons’ ,good old SAG/SYP
 
That’s the bottom corner of the TC and John Street netted off then,what’s that about 500 seats taken out of use,add in the rows above in the BLUT taken out of use for ‘safety reasons’ ,good old SAG/SYP

If McCabe wins and sells we won't be using his security firm, the one that came out in court, it's called Premier Security although based on the segregation and their inability to a) stop people getting on the pitch and b) give a shit that people are on the pitch, they are obviously not premium haha

Maybe we'll get some hard stewards that can run and SAG will give us more seats.
 
Looks decent from outside, inside it's just bizarre, when there's so few seats, make it so you can actually see the pitch, the brick wall on the John Street side, why? Just build it so the seats start from there and go forward, this picture which someone on here took from the Kop just makes it clear that whoever designed this was a cretin of the highest order.

View attachment 54624

There's the gap between it and the Kop, which I don't get? Maybe it's for access to some part of the Kop that needs to be checked, like the pillar, don't know but it's ugly, and if it isn't for inspection reasons, it should have butt right up against the Kop so that there'd be more useful seats.

It's just a reyt state.

Everything about that stand is wrong. It looks tacked on, not enough seats, poor view and poor access.

Also, didn't a builder lose their life working on that corner?
 
Everything about that stand is wrong. It looks tacked on, not enough seats, poor view and poor access.

Also, didn't a builder lose their life working on that corner?

Yeah.

 
It's better to think of the Pukka Pie corner from the other direction, it's a toilet block for the Kop that just happens to have some seats around the back of it.
 
“Following a number of meetings of the stadium Safety Advisory Group, the Local Authority formally agreed not to support any move of away supporters from their current location, concluding that such a relocation would introduce a significant risk to spectator safety.

Newcastle SAG got them the dispensation to avoid pitch side away fans. So SAG over rules Premier League. Expect the same level of segregation to be in place at the Lane next season, at least we may get the whole of the BLUT.
It doesn’t necessarily mean SAG rules over PL, it could just as easily mean the SAG put forward a reasoned and credible case and the PL accepted it.
 
I’d much prefer the pukka pies stand to be demolished. Easily the worst piece of modern football stadium architecture I’ve ever seen. BLLT is perfect for away fans for both location and number of seats.

It’s truly awful. And pointless in terms of adding any decent seating numbers
 
Fans are basically pitch side at Old Trafford. The only reason they are not is because the disabled section is at the front.

So they're not pitch side. The section for people with disabilities is and it means away fans aren't.
Yes or no?
 
So they're not pitch side. The section for people with disabilities is and it means away fans aren't.
Yes or no?
But that's why there's the dispensation - the question that you have been posing. They're as close to the pitch as they possibly can be. I don't think it's that unreasonable.

They're not in the heavens, as you suggested earlier.

Cnbbk-3XYAARrMj.jpg
 
Last edited:



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom