Houston_Blade
Well-Known Member
Perm any one from several dozen.
Depends on your particular poison. Or more succinctly, Wilders !
I like Hogan. Not cheap but would be a quality addition.
I am in a small minority that suggested a deal for Rhodes similar to that which Norwich have made wouldn’t be bad business. I think he could have a field day in our side BUT it’s clear he currently lacks confidence. I’d expect him to have a decent, if unspectacular season at Norwich. A run of games and goals could change this, although I suspect our style would suit him better. I think he would have converted more of the gilt edged chances both Sharp and Clarke missed last season.
No one is suggesting, given player inflation, that we can replace and improve on the cheap. Nor should we.
I have previously stated at £150k, Clarke owes the club and it’s supporters squat. A good buy at THAT price when we were, at the time, an unconvincing Div 3 club.
Times have moved on. Rapidly. We should be, and it would appear are, capable of attracting a better player, at considerable cost. £3m-£6m type range.
UTB
Fair enough, disagree on the Rhodes suggestion, his wages would be crippling and he had no recent form prior to this season to justify maybe £30k a week if the Pigs would have let him come and made a contribution themselves.
My honest view on the other players is that for £5-£8m you don’t get a very good player and we are better sticking with what we have until we identify someone. Waghorn would have been a terrible signing, Gallagher and Hogan slightly better.
I honestly don’t want to see us throw large sums around at average players when we have cheap average players already.