CONFIRMED Kean bryan

[Brian Deane]

Hopefully this signing will add some strength in depth to the squad

 

[nopigfansintown]

According to https://twitter.com/wit_xx United haven't touched the Brooks money yet.Could be some eye catching transfers to come.

 

[Blade58]

According to https://twitter.com/wit_xx United haven't touched the Brooks money yet.Could be some eye catching transfers to come.

NPFIT, you actually got a link to wits actual tweet?

I can't see it

 

[nopigfansintown]

NPFIT, you actually got a link to wits actual tweet?

I can't see it

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Not even touched the Brooke’s money yet</p>&mdash; wit (@wit_xx) <a href="">August 1, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Blade58]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Not even touched the Brooke’s money yet</p>&mdash; wit (@wit_xx) <a href="">August 1, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

If anyone knows, wit does

That's excellent news

I still expect at least a couple more to leave (loan or perm) before the deadline. Holmes? Lavery? Possibily even Lafferty, which will save wages. There's some balancing of the wage budget going on even tho players are arriving

Cheers

 

[Bladezz]

Please take 5 minutes to better understand the correct use of where, were & we're. I like the point you're making but that makes my piss boil.

Autocorrect on phone just chooses one at random. I was correcting them and got bored of trying. We’re usually I have more patience.

 

[Bladezz]

As we have done most of our business early maybe we can move onto other areas like LWB cover. As someone has said above replace Lafferty?

I wouldn’t mind us picking up some youngsters for decent money. Try build for the future that way. Although I think it’s maybe a year too early for us to do thag.

 

[Blade56]

Is the Kean Bryan deal done?

Heard nowt confirming until the snippet in the DM about ownership.....

On Wednesday night they struck a deal with Manchester City to sign 21-year-old Kean Bryan, a highly rated central defender, and are determined to resist offers for centre half Jack O’Connell, who has been subject to two bids from Brighton.

And what is a play-before-we-pay deal?

Are we handing out Gig-economy contracts now?

 

[HeCanDoMagic]

Holmes and Lafferty are now almost certain to leave, by way of loan or permanent.

Frees up yet more wages for the striker and midfielder we are seemingly still after. What a brilliant last week of the window this could be.

 

[S5Blade]

Is the Kean Bryan deal done?

Heard nowt confirming until the snippet in the DM about ownership.....

On Wednesday night they struck a deal with Manchester City to sign 21-year-old Kean Bryan, a highly rated central defender, and are determined to resist offers for centre half Jack O’Connell, who has been subject to two bids from Brighton.

And what is a play-before-we-pay deal?

Are we handing out Gig-economy contracts now?

We get him for free and when we sell him, we owe man city a large percentage of the transfer fee

 

[Blade56]

We get him for free and when we sell him, we owe man city a large percentage of the transfer fee

That's pretty creative. Bit like a car pcp!

 

[TJB.]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Not even touched the Brooke’s money yet</p>&mdash; wit (@wit_xx) <a href="">August 1, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

On a side note, has anyone else heard the rumour (and it's not one I necessarily believe) that 'wit' is actually Wilder on occasion?

Apparently he let slip in a tweet a while back that Chris has his login details and the tweet was swiftly deleted...

 

[Pinchy]

On a side note, has anyone else heard the rumour (and it's not one I necessarily believe) that 'wit' is actually Wilder on occasion?

Apparently he let slip in a tweet a while back that Chris has his login details and the tweet was swiftly deleted...

Old Half really ought to keep himself to himself.

 

[TJB.]

Old Half really ought to keep himself to himself.

I'm very much inclined to agree. Suppose it gives us scamps summet to natter about.

According to my driving instructor (big Blade and avid Twitter user), there's the odd time where 'wit' tweets things which have a different tone to them, or are spelled a bit differently etc. It would be hilarious if CW was indeed hopping on Twitter of a Sunday afternoon down the pub to wind up a few locals.

 

[GrayBlade]

Why on earth would we want another left footed centre back?

 

[EddieColquhoun]

On a side note, has anyone else heard the rumour (and it's not one I necessarily believe) that 'wit' is actually Wilder on occasion?

Apparently he let slip in a tweet a while back that Chris has his login details and the tweet was swiftly deleted...

I've not heard that one, but I'm going to start one that Wit is actually United's director of football and Wit's son oversees training at Shirecliffe.

 

[sheffielder]

Why on earth would we want another left footed centre back?

He can play cb cm and probably lb of lwb . Seems like strength in depth for me

 

[Blade56]

I'm very much inclined to agree. Suppose it gives us scamps summet to natter about.

According to my driving instructor (big Blade and avid Twitter user), there's the odd time where 'wit' tweets things which have a different tone to them, or are spelled a bit differently etc. It would be hilarious if CW was indeed hopping on Twitter of a Sunday afternoon down the pub to wind up a few locals.

More likely the Russians using social media to influence English football

 

[TJB.]

Why on earth would we want another left footed centre back?

Because if O'Connell gets injured we're a bit fucked without one?

 

[Eric Cartman]

Why on earth would we want another left footed centre back?

Cover and competition. It’s how you improve

 

[SteveBlade]

Because when O'Connell gets sold we're a bit fucked without one?

Translated for those without Blade anxiety goggles on.

 

[Pinchy]

I'm very much inclined to agree. Suppose it gives us scamps summet to natter about.

According to my driving instructor (big Blade and avid Twitter user), there's the odd time where 'wit' tweets things which have a different tone to them, or are spelled a bit differently etc. It would be hilarious if CW was indeed hopping on Twitter of a Sunday afternoon down the pub to wind up a few locals.

Brooke’s money. Dear oh dear. Semi-literate estate agent leeches really ought not to bring attention to themselves in the guise of professional “Wilder’s mate”.

T’wit needs to wind his neck in on politics as well. At least until he’s a little more widely read than the Daily Mail.

Sorry Half, you’ll be buying and selling no bricks for me.

 

[Ricky]

Brooke's really is totally inexcusable.

 

[Rusty view]

According to https://twitter.com/wit_xx United haven't touched the Brooks money yet.Could be some eye catching transfers to come.

By no means ITK but they guy who told me about Brooks going said our budget was circa £6m. This is before Brooks money is taken into account. Naturally the full £12m wont be available, some will no doubt be offset on running costs, servicing annual debt, some will no doubt go back into the academy which helped develop him. Still leaves us a bit to play with - provided we don't get held to ransom (which we no doubt will).

 

[GrayBlade]

Because if O'Connell gets injured we're a bit fucked without one?

I remember saying something like that myself when we signed Martyn Woolford and Brighton were interested in Murphy.

But you’re right, having Lafferty as main cover for Jack isn’t good. Nowt to worry about here...is there?

 

[EddieColquhoun]

Old Half really ought to keep himself to himself.

He's an old pal of mine, but I'm loving the nickname!

 

[Keef Chedwyn]

I remember saying something like that myself when we signed Martyn Woolford and Brighton were interested in Murphy.

But you’re right, having Lafferty as main cover for Jack isn’t good. Nowt to worry about here...is there?

Daniel Lafferty has never let us down from what I've seen.

 

[Wards]

Daniel Lafferty has never let us down from what I've seen.

Nor from what I've seen either. He's defensively very sound, better than Freeman, Baldock or Stevens from that point of view. Doesn't offer a lot going forward but that's never been his game.

 

[Houso]

Slap a green on it. Confirmed.

 

[mattbianco1]

CONFIRMED...



Spaghetti head