The Crab
Utter Gobshite
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2016
- Messages
- 31,958
- Reaction score
- 64,671
Be more than Thirsty Junior...
I spent more on lunch than they'll get for him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Be more than Thirsty Junior...
Brooks is the best talent seen at the Lane since Currie. Anyone who can't see this knows fuck all about football. It's inevitable that he will be be leaving some time in the future but if United sell him for the first bid, especially when they don't have to just yet, then they can fuck right off. That will be me done.
£12m plus add ons and sell on clause apparently?10 million plus (reported) is a hell of a return for a Good half season of mostly cameos
Brooks is an excellent young talent and will do well, not sure Bournemouth really is a great move for him, would’ve thought the likes of spurs or Liverpool would suit him better, but if that’s the offer on the table then fair enough.
I was hoping to see him really take this league apart this season, but looks like it’s not going to happen.
I’m sure a decent few quid in Wilders kitty has persuaded him to allow Brooks to go.
Let’s hope we spend it wisely
Yeah we’d tied him to a longer more lucrative contract.
What’s your point? We should never sell even if it works better for the club?
How do you know it is the first bid?Brooks is the best talent seen at the Lane since Currie. Anyone who can't see this knows fuck all about football. It's inevitable that he will be be leaving some time in the future but if United sell him for the first bid, especially when they don't have to just yet, then they can fuck right off. That will be me done.
What if he’s the one pushing for this move?
Would you consider it irrelevant and make him stay?
I wonder if we might get a player from them on loan as part of the deal. Sure we've shown interest in that Lys Mousset, correct me if I'm wrong. Or even Lewis Grabban?
Maddison went for £24 million,double what we get for Brooks................scandlous.
Tadic went for £10 million today and Flint for £7 million, so who knows what's happening with transfer fees.
Hope he dont go and spunk it up on some more Lundstram and Leonard types.
However much Bournemouth are paying us. They simply aren’t the right club. If Brooks had another half decent season with us, he’d be able to have his pick of clubs. It’s quite feasible that we could be playing Bournemouth the season after next.
Yeah just like 2 mill for che adams was a great deal right! How much is he worth now
Was on the cards as soon as he changed agents, if Wilder is happy, that will do for me, let's just hope he given more money than he was when Adams & Calvert-Lewin were sold.
Question for you (and any others):
If you’d been told you could have £2m for transfers, however if you sold Brooks you could have £14m, what would you do?
I reckon CW is backing himself big time with this move.
you do know that 'Sky Sources' are internet forums don't you ? They have a team searching forums every day especially for the clubs in the top two leagues.
SUFC will always have a small club mentality as will half of our fans as proven with some of the comments on here
This is the same agent as Che Adams of course! One thing I've always really liked about Brooks is that he is so level headed and football was always the most important thing to him it seems. Not saying that's changed but I don't personally think a move at this stage of his career to the Pl is a good move. Maybe he'll come back on loan or join another Championship team, hopefully the former not latter.
Ooh the first meltdown of the new campaign. Is everyone having fun?
I WAMNT £600MILLON POWNDS OR MCCABE CN FCK OFF MCBABE OUUUUUT
Small club and small club mentality isn’t the same.
Do you see Huddersfield, Brighton, Crystal Palace, Wolves, Cardiff, or even fucking Wednesday offloading their best and most promising players? Maguire, Walker- it’s always the fucking same. And we wonder why we never succeed. Fucking pathetic as always. Same old United.
It's inevitable that he will be be leaving some time in the future but if United sell him for the first bid, especially when they don't have to just yet, then they can fuck right off. That will be me done..
Well, other clubs keep players who want to move. Why can't we? It was only 5 minutes ago Brooks was very happy here.
If he wants to leave and Wilder's made the decision, I suggest Wilder's growing ego has played a part, as well as any possible benefit to his transfer budget. 'If you don't want to be here then off you go' is an inflexible stance that won't always be in the club's best interests. If we waited until July I think we'd get a better fee, let alone until January or the end of the season.
Offer or to Mick Rooks Rooker with a bit of tape thrown in.What shall I do with the Brooks 36 shirt I bought? Gaffer tape? Sharpie?
Ps. Didn't want a name and number shirt but it was cheaper than the other options in my size at the time, I'll never buy another ffs.
Looks like Wilders pal just confirmed it’s pretty much down to his new agent.
I disagree to be honest. The way I see it, Wilder has constantly pushed a philosophy of 'team before individual'. This includes signings and, in my opinion, outgoings. If a player wants to leave, I think Wilder agreeing to sell is as much wanting to show confidence in his squad, as it is not wanting a player who isn't 100% committed. Brooks wasn't instrumental for us last season, and nobody knows for sure that he would have been next season.Well, other clubs keep players who want to move. Why can't we? It was only 5 minutes ago Brooks was very happy here.
If he wants to leave and Wilder's made the decision, I suggest Wilder's growing ego has played a part, as well as any possible benefit to his transfer budget. 'If you don't want to be here then off you go' is an inflexible stance that won't always be in the club's best interests. If we waited until July I think we'd get a better fee, let alone until January or the end of the season.
Looks like Wilders pal just confirmed it’s pretty much down to his new agent.
If that’s true then I reckon that initial offer was before Wilders radio interview and that Brooks wanted to leave then. They turned the offer down and said “x is the price” then Wilder did the “stupid money” interview and now we are here.
This.
It isn't about selling players, its about the pathetic fees we get for them. Time after time its the same, we always undersell our best young players.
Sorry to quote your post here but can’t find the one quoting twirlo -
The problem I have with twirlo’s comment is “cherries player may be coming”
“May”
Ha.
It was nailed on as soon as he switched agents. It's what they do.
This is what makes it so galling that he looks like he’s going on the cheap - Brooks isn’t a che Adams or a Calvert-Lewin, a half decent prospect, he’s drawn genuine comparison with TC, you’re bang on - anyone who can’t see how good he is does not know anything about football. Feeling disillusioned with blades with this news. Would be good for us to show a modicum of ambition just for once.
It will be spent on a clutch of upper First division / lower Championship level make weights like we got in the JTW. Same owdI'll just point this out, because nobody has yet...
Now we'll need to sign 3 forwards. Not just 2. And probably an attacking midfielder as well.
If we want quality, this extra few million Wilder might be given really won't go a very long way.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?