McCabe Ultimatum?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Foxy

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Messages
38,404
Reaction score
36,327
Location
S8
Interesting words...

Sheffield United chairman Kevin McCabe wants an end to Kyle Naughton's transfer saga.

The Daily Mail says Naughton, 20, is keen on Everton, believing he has a better chance of regular first-team football at Goodison Park than with Tottenham.

McCabe said: "It won't go on much longer. Unless these clubs satisfy our requirements by Friday I'll pull the shutters down. The rumours have gone on for a few days and that's unhealthy."

and a bit more since:

If a transfer is done – as seems most likely – McCabe believes several signings will swiftly follow.

He said: "There are quite a few players we are negotiating to buy. One or two are big names for big sums. We have signed three so far and others are likely to be joining."

McCabe stressed that neither Naughton nor Walker had been put on the market.

He said: "There have been approaches for the two youngsters that we have not been able to stop. In many respects this is unwanted.

"If we had got promoted last season there would have been no issue at all. As it is, when Premier League clubs come in you can't deny the opportunity. It's the way of the world."
 



Fair play to Kevin McCabe; this is exactly the kind of statement that i wanted to hear coming out of the club.

Hopefully next week we can concentrate on the build up to the start of the new season rather then worrying about the players who won't be available to us.
 
Whilst I don't agree with the way we've rolled over in accepting the bid

Well done McCabe for not getting drawn in to making comments previously and hopefully this can all be finalised one way or another by tomorrow.

At least McCabe has come and spoken out rather than Turry
 
There is nothing like a good conspiracy theory and at SUFC we certainly dont do anything like a good conspiracy theory.
 
more added to the original post :)
 
Cheers Foxy... I made my earlier comments before you added the 2nd part.

"One or two are big names for big sums" worries me slightly

Big names usually mean a big drain on the wages and back to square one again like we were with BT.

I want us to get proven players at this level that aren't necessarily big names and big sums but can do a job and fit into the team.

Get us a mobile striker, replace the players we sell and get a Macca or Brown type player for the midfield
 
One thought has come to mind, If we were unable to stop these approaches in the first place (McCabes quote).

Then how on earth are we going to end it by Friday? (Other than selling them all)
 
"One or two are big names"...

Jan Venegoor of Hesselink has got a big name! I wonder if it's him?!
 
Finally us blades have got what we deserve! An explination! I'm happier now and it makes sense what he's said. I'll give him credit for that just as I was losing faith.
 
I just hope his claims of big name signings to follow the sale of the two Kyles don't come back to haunt him.

Shades of the "striker lined up to replace Beattie" scenario during the last transfer window?
 



One thought has come to mind, If we were unable to stop these approaches in the first place (McCabes quote).

Then how on earth are we going to end it by Friday? (Other than selling them all)

Fantastic point well made mate.`
 
There is a simple way to stop teams giving your players unwanted attention. Report them to FIFA.
 
There is a simple way to stop teams giving your players unwanted attention. Report them to FIFA.

McCabe: "Hello, we'd like to report a team for making an illegal approach for one of our players"

Sepp Blatter's Secretary "Stealing your players? That's Scandalous!!! I'll have him call you right back. What is your number?"

McCabe: "44 (...)"

Sepp Blatter's Secretary "Oh! let me stop you right there! 44 you say? That's England right? I'm afraid Sepp is busy for the rest of his life time, goodbye [click]"
 
There is a simple way to stop teams giving your players unwanted attention. Report them to FIFA.

Simple way to manage this:
1. Players under contract - reject all bids
2. If the player wants to go, he must submit a written transfer request

Otherwise we don't sell, this should be regardless of whether we're PL or Championship... unless of course we're happy to sell. In this case see Turry's procedure for 'snapping hands off'
 
One thought has come to mind, If we were unable to stop these approaches in the first place (McCabes quote).

Then how on earth are we going to end it by Friday? (Other than selling them all)

My understanding is that these players still have ongoing contracts with us and aren't even transfer listed.

These approaches are unwelcome (as McCabe said) but are being tolerated by Utd, as Premiership clubs might be seen by the Kyles as a professional step upwards (It is in effect a goodwill gesture by the club to the Kyles - albeit one through which the club may make £11mil!!). However, the club has every right to stop other clubs talking to our players under contract (if they do so without our consent it's considered "tapping up") - and has every right to insist that players contracted to Sheff Utd fulfill their contracts - - therefore McCabe and the club can end this on Friday by simply telling all other clubs that thay can no longer hold discussions with our players - end of story.

The down side is that this may upset the Kyles who may feel our club has blocked their professional progression (as with Paul Devlin in the past) - and the club gambles on possibly being able to make £11mil on these two at some later date.
 
Simple way to manage this:
1. Players under contract - reject all bids
2. If the player wants to go, he must submit a written transfer request

Otherwise we don't sell, this should be regardless of whether we're PL or Championship... unless of course we're happy to sell. In this case see Turry's procedure for 'snapping hands off'


Yeah that'd work...

Real Madrid: "Please can we have Stephen Quinn? We'll give you £80 million!"

United: "No, get stuffed! He's under contract! ps. you can have him in two years for free instead!"
 
Yeah that'd work...

Real Madrid: "Please can we have Stephen Quinn? We'll give you £80 million!"

United: "No, get stuffed! He's under contract! ps. you can have him in two years for free instead!"

See Turry's procedure...
 
It's a good move by McCabe. If they choose not to listen to him, then hopefully he'll stand by his words (fingers crossed) and close the shutters on the proposed deals.
 
I don't believe much of what Mccabe says, on live radio he said BT wasn't leaving, 3 days later he's gone. Money talks with the United board, alway has always will, I've seen us over the years sell off key players season after season, than wonder where it's all going wrong the year after.

All this bull about wages this and wages that, nah it's all about the G's always has been, and in United case, always will be.....but maybe just maybe if they stuck it out, invested and watched the team grow, we'd be in the premier maybe making more money.....but as it is, quick easy money is our way. Pisses me off.

A one off I could understand, but it happens just about year in year out. BB said we have no ambition, and the way we wheel and deal, it does seem that way....So here's to making a quick buck....Cheers!
 



It's a good move by McCabe. If they choose not to listen to him, then hopefully he'll stand by his words (fingers crossed) and close the shutters on the proposed deals.

Its a good move now...
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom