mancunianblade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2011
- Messages
- 5,773
- Reaction score
- 7,531
According to Sky? pure guess work that. not that I'm complaining that they have it wrong lowers the pressure on us
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Said what, Bzz?I said that earlier and got destroyed for it on here.
£1m is pathetic to be fair. We really have fallen behind so many clubs in terms of spending power - many of them much smaller than us. I guess that's why all our business so far has been squad fillers rather than the 2 or 3 quality players we need.According to Sky? pure guess work that. not that I'm complaining that they have it wrong lowers the pressure on us
Did he xxxxFor he record I'd be confident it's a fair bit more than that. Stearman alone cost more than a £1m did he not?
Sky haven't got a scooby doo how much we've spent. Up until now we've spent £UNDISCLOSED.Not sure how they could list us as spending £1 million when they also showed Stearman warming up with undisclosed fee on the caption under his name.
£1m is pathetic to be fair. We really have fallen behind so many clubs in terms of spending power - many of them much smaller than us. I guess that's why all our business so far has been squad fillers rather than the 2 or 3 quality players we need.
According to Sky? pure guess work that. not that I'm complaining that they have it wrong lowers the pressure on us
£1m is pathetic to be fair. We really have fallen behind so many clubs in terms of spending power - many of them much smaller than us. I guess that's why all our business so far has been squad fillers rather than the 2 or 3 quality players we need.
£1m is pathetic to be fair. We really have fallen behind so many clubs in terms of spending power - many of them much smaller than us. I guess that's why all our business so far has been squad fillers rather than the 2 or 3 quality players we need.
I have to say I'm not a fan of our recruitment so far but hopefully things will change before the window shuts. I'm not entirely convinced that the reason we haven't spent more is because Wilder didn't want to, let's put it that way.
Even more pathetic when an additional £7 million in sell ons has been brought in.
But hey, this is United.
If there's a cheap way of doing it we'll do it, and when our couple of good players want to leave to better themselves it will be a disaster
Even more pathetic when an additional £7 million in sell ons has been brought in.
But hey, this is United.
If there's a cheap way of doing it we'll do it, and when our couple of good players want to leave to better themselves it will be a disaster
And you know this, how?we currently have offers of 4.5m in give or take a few quid,
I willAre you going to apologise on here when we splash the cash?
And you know this, how?
And how much has come in due to sell on clauses?erm we bid 2m for coady, 1.75 for lenighan and over 500k for leonard, all admitted by wilder, you do the math
And how much has come in due to sell on clauses?
and how much have we lost after 6 seasons in league one? oh and then there is ffp which you guys who like to moan at every opportunity always seem to ignore, we have had six years of lower income, where do you think the money is going to come from, at current with transfers done and bids in we have tried to spend every penny we have recieved in fees for dcl, harry and walker
Even I wouldn't dream of being paid £10 per weekThe money didn't come from gate receipts.
Although we've had good crowds, admission prices have been kept at reasonable levels.
We've paid players £10 per week wages, a salary level other league 1 clubs dream about.
I've known fans of other league 1 teams saying we're the Man City of league 1 and think we can buy our way out of it.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?