Credit to danny04 for coming on here to explain things and his reasoning behind certain stories. I think that he is in a small minoriry of reporters who can actually write a story properly. I believe that up until a couple years ago, the star were deliberately avoiding certain stories about Wednesday,mainly the desperation of trying to sell the club, its debts and it's owners dodgy background. Whereas if the same story was about blades, it would have been published without a doubt. The star are currently rather neutral and unbiased to both clubs. However, often i find that the depth of stories are rather weak, uninteresting and some are obviously lifted from forums, elsewhere in the paper, there seems to a shift in the quality of reporting. Several stories are written alike to a facebook status, littered with grammatical errors, using generic and google images, and worse of all, they are not proof read.They are actually published! This contributes massively to the papers lack of credibility, also the pop up advertising on stories are often very insensitive to the nature of the story. I wonder if those writers of stories, ever envisaged at college/uni, that they would become the laughing stock of its readers? If the star's reporters carry on writing such half arsed stories, there won't be a paper to read. Standards must be raised at the star or kiss goodbye to the local rag, and most of Sheffield would just say....not surprised. And to add, tonight in the star, the Leeds fan's blow job in dominoes pizza complete with cctv footage is an all time low, children can watch it, no warnings.That there is the best example of how it low its standards have stooped.