Silent Blade
Well-Known Member
And pay the wages he is getting?Would every team in this division give anything to have Billy in their side?
Yes, they would. I'm glad he's ours.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
And pay the wages he is getting?Would every team in this division give anything to have Billy in their side?
Yes, they would. I'm glad he's ours.
I share the OP's view on what Gary had said "Well Done, Billy". Not very professional of him to say this as it could have been "a little dig" at Wilder for not playing the style of play that Billy enjoyed last season. Last season Atkins instructed his team to play the ball to Sharp's feet but I have noticed that Wilder prefers his players to pass the ball in front of the strikers than to their feet also making the strikers "defend from the front" more. I am all for Wilder to play a winning style to suit the team rather than play a style to suit Sinclair's pal!Here's a thought. Why not ask the only person in the fucking world who'll know the answer? You know, Gary Sinclair!
Do you think we spent the after match pint discussing the thoughts and idea's of the great man? Did we dissect his pre-match and half time playlist to find any hidden Satanist messages, or critique his birthday/mascot announcements?
For what it's worth I though Billy was below par. Was it bad enough for a thread giving him a going over? Nah, otherwise we might have got one without the "disguise".
On the whole it is bullshit OP's that end up causing fractious threads and this has become a very fractious thread!
When Billy got subbed, Gary Sinclair said "Well played Billy" over the tannoy.
In my opinion, Billy was shit today. Didn't chase down the opponents, Done did all of that, he fluffed a 1 on 1 chance with the keeper which he would've buried if it was last season (by that i mean he was miles better last season than this season) and he also played terrible ball down the line to Done and the ball went out for a throw.
Personally, Scougall had a much much better game than Sharp and he got subbed in 55th minute. No mention of "Well played Scougs"
Why does everyone love Billy, and praise him even when he has done absolutely nothing?
Apart from Lafferty, would say Billy was the worst player on the pitch so why did Gary praise him for his performance?
Like i've mentioned before, if Sharp does nothing all game and scores a 89th minute penalty to win us the game or to get us a draw, all i see is "Billy the man" "Billy our savior"
No. Billy hasn't done much at all this season, he's only got a few goals to his name because of penalties other team-mates have earnt and he takes all the credit.
Hoping others agree with how I feel about Billy and how much he is underperforming for us at the moment.
Last thing - I am happy with the win, and am relieved we did win
Have you ever see Done score a penalty ? Just saying
Has he ever been a penalty taker at any of his clubs ? Just saying
How do you know Done would have scored ? Just saying
Why is it a competition to slag off Sharp to praise Done ? Just saying
Why do people say 'just saying' when they aren't really saying anything ? Just saying
Harsh. Not saying he should be beyond criticism, not at all. But we're getting a bit of a feelgood factor back &, clearly, Billy getting a bit of adulation as he went off was all part of that. Can't see the harm at all.
All I want to know is that Billy's not undroppable if he does go through a sustained dip, because we have now got proper options up front (especially when Clarke returns). Wilder says no-one's undroppable & I trust him on that.
Re: the atmosphere & the closening bond amongst players and between players & fans btw - the scenes at the end were great. It was a joy staying a bit after the end & applauding them off. Things really feel like they're starting to buzz.
you are just a 'like' whoreDon't know
I don't
It's not, it's an observation on the way he's playing. He's not scoring, he's missing chances that he gets, he's not creating for others. I think everyone wants him to do well but just because he's a blade does not make him immune to critical observations.
Maybe to replicate what they may sometimes say in light hearted conversations, usually accompanied by a knowing smile. In northern climes, it's often followed with "like".
Just saying, like![]()
Did you forget Done had scored 2 this year, Ricky?Sharp's scored two penalties, not three.
So Done wouldn't be top scorer if he scored the pens, nor would anyone else.
But if you look at Billy's open play goals and the number of games he's played in all competitions, it's not good - 3 in 12 starts.
He needs to get going soon. Hopefully he'll go on one of his five game scoring runs.
and so does Done...easy chance missed at Wimbledon, one against Peterborough and two yesterday. Yet this doesn't seem to get mentioned but Sharp's misses do.Not worried about Billy running about, but he did have another one on one with the keeper early on
That going in would have opened up the game ....... he needs to get back to being a bit more clinical
Cheeky git! Old? Do you mean me or the car?Hey GB, good to see you, hope you are well. Fair points. And I'm sure you'll accept that I really want Billy to be the goalscoring star he has been. After all, there's nothing quite like seeing a fellow Blade do it on the pitch for us. But right now, I fear a little for him, he just doesn't look right and I'd be tempted to take you up on the bet if you take out the penalties. He mustered 21 (from memory) last season and 7 (again from memory) were penalties.
I'd keep yer money in yer pocket mate, I know how important it is to you old 'uns.
Especially with petrol bills like yours![]()
I don't think we're playing to Sharp's strengths BB.
We should hold a serious inquest and scrutinise Billys every move if he doesn't bang a goal in or destroy every defence in front of him every game.
Let's do this every week, it'll be fun.
I like your posts Silent but where have you got such a downer on Sharp ?Which is more important? Playing to Sharp's strengths (didn't work for the team last season) or playing to the team's strengths?
I suppose that depends on whether or not playing to the rest of the team's strengths will get us better results than a proven goal scorers Silent. Currently with this seasons players, we seem to be doing ok results-wise, so I don't see any point in changing anything right now for Sharp's benefit or otherwise. That could of course change as the season progresses, other players like Lavery may step up to the mark.Which is more important? Playing to Sharp's strengths (didn't work for the team last season) or playing to the team's strengths?
I didn't want him in the first place and did make a post in here before we signed him for the 3rd time. He was rather stroppy when he got subbed last night and I get the impression that he isn't happy with having to run more. With Brayford now at Burton, I believe he is the highest wage earner at the club and despite that I think he does work very hard but I do not think he is worth the wages we are paying him (yes, I blame Adkins) cos of his limited pace and lack of heightI like your posts Silent but where have you got such a downer on Sharp ?
To answer your point,surely the team should be playing to each others strengths in a system the manager wants to play
Proven goalscorers don't always bring the club success. I prefer a team who work for each other and more players from midfield scoring goalsI suppose that depends on whether or not playing to the rest of the team's strengths will get us better results than a proven goal scorers Silent. Currently with this seasons players, we seem to be doing ok results-wise, so I don't see any point in changing anything right now for Sharp's benefit or otherwise. That could of course change as the season progresses, other players like Lavery may step up to the mark.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?