LudlamBlade
UTB
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2020
- Messages
- 1,793
- Reaction score
- 3,601
I think that's potentially going to be a telling indicator as to how things went down.Chris resigned. The Prince said he resigned, he tried to resign 3 times in total and managed it on the third try but somehow managed to get £4m too. Not sure where you get constructive dismissal from the interview ?
He did criticise he says several times he told Chris he was not happy with 3 key areas. One was Recruitment, forgot the other two. The week of Chris leaving he says he tried to sit down and have a meeting every other day. First meeting they put each others sides over. Again PA mentioned the 3 areas the board was not happy with. Same meeting they also told him they wanted him to stay. When the day of the 2nd meeting came Chris turned up said he wasnt happy with the previous meeting and would not say anymore then his agent sent them a letter explaining his resignation. PA then got his team to respond by the letter asking to speak to Chris but he wasnt happy about this letter in response so all comms broke down and he refused to talk about it anymore I think that was either the Wednesday or Thursday. We know what happened after that.
He quite clearly explains this all in the interview he openly admits the areas he wasnt happy with and his reasons. We've heard one sides apparently honest explanation the only misinformation we have is Chris Wilders side we are yet to hear from.
The thing I dislike about the interview is Chris allegedly resigning then asking for £4m. If that was me at work asking for £40000 and resigning they would tell me to do one.
Also since when cant a Boss criticise his workers because they are not performing a project (shall we call it as an example) well and he expected them to do better ?
PA criticised him over his recruitment choices and to me he was fair and honest its been said many times on here recruitment was not right and PA's explanation is he gave Chris full autonomy over recruitment suggestions but instead of getting 5 or 6 the board could go after it seems they got 1 in some circumstances and it was either that person or nothing. So we ended up with nothing. There needs to be more than one choice in case the No.1 choice falls through due to wage disagreements etc. Again according to PA.
I think PA came across as genuinely honest. Just need to wait for the book to come out for the other side and then we can see if the two sides match or not.
Once the NDA has expired and CW can tell his side of the story, will he just come out and tell it?
Or will it all be revealed in a book so he can get another few grand in the kitty?
Who knows, only time will tell.