Will CW go if no funds for promotion

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Danny04 said:
1) Did I say I believed it?
2) Where was January mentioned?
3) Does it matter who posted it if it provoked sensible debate? (I know...)
4) Do you think CW’s loyalty is absolute and he will never leave, even if he thinks he isn’t getting the backing he deserves?
Click to expand...
1.) you posted it to continue the debate and to get a reaction. Given the context that’s baiting other fans and knowing the audience on here you know what you’re doing.
2.) It wasn’t but again it’s the time of year. It also didn’t say in the summer because he’s a pig alluding to the other lot being a more attractive option in order to get a reaction. You’re content to assist him for some reason.
3.) Yes it does because context matters and it wasn’t posted in the interests of debate, again as you’re well aware.
4.) No I don’t at all, but it’s just my opinion, and I’m happy to have that discussion with sensible fellow fans and have done. I’m not willing to have that same discussion with someone just looking to wind fans up and get a reaction because they are desperate for some attention.

Do you have a story that CW is unhappy with the backing he’s receiving and looking to leave?
 
Last edited:



Danny04 said:
1) Did I say I believed it?
2) Where was January mentioned?
3) Does it matter who posted it if it provoked sensible debate? (I know...)
4) Do you think CW’s loyalty is absolute and he will never leave, even if he thinks he isn’t getting the backing he deserves?
Click to expand...

Typical click bait, shit stirring Stir “journalist”. FFS do you ever do any work in researching a story or do you just insinuate nonsense to get a reaction?
 
Richard Haythorne said:
It was a question for discussion.Surely if we're to stay in the championship because of a lack of funds this will become an issue for a manager with ambition.its human nature to prove yourself against the best .
UTB ...how very dare you suggest otherwise
Click to expand...
 
Wilder isn't going to leave now but what happens in January may have a major bearing on whether he feels he can achieve what he wants to here longer term.
 
Flatulent_Bob said:
1.) you posted it to continue the debate and to get a reaction. Given the context that’s baiting other fans and knowing the audience on here you know what you’re doing.
2.) It wasn’t but again it’s the time of year. It also didn’t say in the summer because he’s a pig alluding to the other lot being a more attractive option in order to get a reaction. You’re content to assist him for some reason.
3.) Yes it does because context matters and it wasn’t posted in the interests of debate, again as you’re well aware.
4.) No I don’t at all, but it’s just my opinion, and I’m happy to have that discussion with sensible fellow fans and have done. I’m not willing to have that same discussion with someone just looking to wind fans up and get a reaction because they are desperate for some attention.

Do you have a story that CW is unhappy with the backing he’s receiving and looking to leave?
Click to expand...

No I didn’t.
No I’m not.
I don’t think it does.
Have the debate with me, then.
No I haven’t, and never claimed to have one.

Wapping Blade said:
Typical click bait, shit stirring Stir “journalist”. FFS do you ever do any work in researching a story or do you just insinuate nonsense to get a reaction?
Click to expand...

Maybe one day I’ll reach that level of intellectual posting. :rolleyes: Same question to you then - do you think CW’s loyalty is absolute and he’d never consider leaving, even if he considered the ambitions of others not to match his own?
 
Wapping Blade said:
Typical click bait, shit stirring Stir “journalist”. FFS do you ever do any work in researching a story or do you just insinuate nonsense to get a reaction?
Click to expand...
There you go Danny04. Hence why I thought your post was beneath you because it’s difficult to defend yourself against it when its clear you’ve posted for a reaction rather than your truely held beliefs or any real debate. It plays that you are being contrary on the supercilious belief that it creates a discussion by those not as smart as you.
I don’t buy your comment that you weren’t aware of what the OP was up to because I don’t think you’re that ignorant or stupid, so that doesn’t leave many other reasons for it, away from the “to create a reaction” option.

I didn’t think that was your raison d'être, but if it is then that’s a real shame.

PS you’ve still not answered my question about what you know in regards to your comment despite being asked twice. That’s also the behaviour of someone not wanting a debate but just wanting to lead the discussion, so I’ll not continue to waste either of our time.
 
Flatulent_Bob said:
There you go Danny04. Hence why I thought your post was beneath you because it’s difficult to defend yourself against it when its clear you’ve posted for a reaction rather than your truely held beliefs or any real debate. It plays that you are being contrary on the supercilious belief that it creates a discussion by those not as smart as you.
I don’t buy your comment that you weren’t aware of what the OP was up to because I don’t think you’re that ignorant or stupid, so that doesn’t leave many other reasons for it, away from the “to create a reaction” option.

I didn’t think that was your raison d'être, but if it is then that’s a real shame.

PS you’ve still not answered my question about what you know in regards to your comment despite being asked twice. That’s also the behaviour of someone not wanting a debate but just wanting to lead the discussion, so I’ll not continue to waste either of our time.
Click to expand...

I answered you. I said no I haven’t and never claimed to have one. That post to me is a load of waffle so to make it easy for you, I believe that the OP’s point is an interesting debate regardless of who he supports and I also believe that CW’s loyalty will only stretch so far. Agree with that or not, I don’t really care but if you don’t, debate it with reason without bringing something irrelevant like employment into it, as I wouldn’t bring your job into the debate (if I knew it. What is it, out of interest?)

northsomersetblade said:
Would Danny04 accept an offer from The Daily Mail with 20 million to spend on making up stories from the executive boxes and the chance of meeting Fatty Samuels?
Click to expand...

Would you take £20m to continue doing your job, just for a different employer? o_O And journos in executive boxes... do me a favour :)
 
Danny04 said:
I answered you. I said no I haven’t and never claimed to have one. That post to me is a load of waffle so to make it easy for you, I believe that the OP’s point is an interesting debate regardless of who he supports and I also believe that CW’s loyalty will only stretch so far. Agree with that or not, I don’t really care but if you don’t, debate it with reason without bringing something irrelevant like employment into it, as I wouldn’t bring your job into the debate (if I knew it. What is it, out of interest?)
Click to expand...
So you’ve no idea but thought it’s worth debating (again) and whipping up all the same anti board nonsense (again), just as it did on one of the previous threads where it was brought up and discussed. Which, incidentally weren’t started by a WUM.
Also given the context I think your job role is relevant (unlike mine as it has no bearing although I’m happy to share if you’re that interested) because you regularly get accused, as per the post I quoted, of creating content in your paper to not create debate but a reaction and they aren’t the same thing. That was the only relevance as my original post was that winding up fans was beneath you yet I’m obviously aware of yours and your employers reputation on here which I normally think is unfair but your comments feed it. Again leading to the post I quoted.

I appreciate you finally replying saying you know nothing, but given what you’ve posted on here, that therefore only strengthens my belief that you were on the wind. Obviously, as you took time to post in your reply, you don’t care and my points are waffle, which given where we now find ourselves is a positive we can both walk away with.
I don’t believe you and you don’t care.
Happy New Year.
 
Last edited:



Flatulent_Bob said:
So you’ve no idea but thought it’s worth debating (again) and whipping up all the same anti board nonsense (again), just as it did on one of the previous threads where it was brought up and discussed. Which, incidentally weren’t started by a WUM.
Also given the context I think your job role is relevant (unlike mine as it has no bearing) because you get accused as per the post I quoted of creating content to not create debate but a reaction and they aren’t the same thing.

I appreciate you finally replying saying you know nothing, but given what you’ve posted on here, that therefore only strengthens my belief that you were on the wind. Obviously, as you took time to post in your reply, you don’t care and my points are waffle, which given where we now find ourselves is a positive we can both walk away with.
Click to expand...

Where was the other post? Can’t remember seeing that. Missed your appointment as the thread police who dictates where we all can and can’t post replies, but congrats on that! You’ll do a fine job.
What purpose would ‘creating content to create a reaction’, as you accuse me, serve me exactly?
I’m as entitled to wildly speculate about CW and any other aspect of SUFC as you or anybody else. What I write on here and elsewhere will be, and are, very different things. Now, what makes you certain CW will never walk away from The Lane?
 
Danny04 said:
Where was the other post? Can’t remember seeing that. Missed your appointment as the thread police who dictates where we all can and can’t post replies, but congrats on that! You’ll do a fine job.
What purpose would ‘creating content to create a reaction’, as you accuse me, serve me exactly?
I’m as entitled to wildly speculate about CW and any other aspect of SUFC as you or anybody else. What I write on here and elsewhere will be, and are, very different things. Now, what makes you certain CW will never walk away from The Lane?
Click to expand...
So you do care?
Just not enough to read the replies In which I tagged you and to which you quoted and replied, which cover all the above, but you care none the less?
You’ve also entirely missed the point of why I said replying on this thread was beneath you, which has nothing to do with telling you where to post but merely highlighting what accusations would follow.
Which predictably they did.


PS I don’t think CW would never walk away and I’ve never stated he would stay regardless of backing. But you’ve totally missed it by getting so upset with my replies. You know the ones you don’t care about.

As I don’t believe you, and you don’t care, surely we’re done here now?
 
I am absolutely certain Chris Wilder would never walk away from BDTBL...he’d drive...maybe get a taxi or if funds were particularly low, hop on’t bus!

UTB!
 
Flatulent_Bob said:
So you do care?
Just not enough to read the replies In which I tagged you and to which you quoted and replied, which cover all the above, but you care none the less?
You’ve also entirely missed the point of why I said replying on this thread was beneath you, which has nothing to do with telling you where to post but merely highlighting what accusations would follow.
Which predictably they did.


PS I don’t think CW would never walk away and I’ve never stated he would stay regardless of backing. But you’ve totally missed it by getting so upset with my replies. You know the ones you don’t care about.

As I don’t believe you, and you don’t care, surely we’re done here now?
Click to expand...

You’ve answered exactly 0 of my points and if you’re not interested in actually debating the point, I’m baffled as to why you piled in. Maybe you’re the one on the wind up...
 
Danny04 said:
You’ve answered exactly 0 of my points and if you’re not interested in actually debating the point, I’m baffled as to why you piled in. Maybe you’re the one on the wind up...
Click to expand...
You mean apart from the post whereby I replied matching your numbering and giving you a response to each point you made?
You’re making yourself look a little daft now.

Anyway I wouldn’t want you to think I’m winding you up, and I can see the last word is important to you, so go ahead have another dig. I won’t repond and then you can go to bed and sleep soundly in the knowledge that you won.
You know even though you don’t care.
 
Ok enough is enough . 5 pages . I support sufc . Go to bed . I hope CW is there for the next decade and has 50 million to spend a year and gets us into to Europe.
I aint a piggy. Ps Lundstrom is going to be a class player in prem . Night all
See you on the Shoreham v Bolton
 
Btw this thread at least shows passion if mis directed at times. We all support the same team but with diff views/ideas ..if we dont agree it don't make us piggies
 
oldblade said:
If you google Richard Haythorne you will find a person with that name on facebook. He is from Sheffield and lo and behold his favourite sports team is Sheffield Wednesday.
Click to expand...

He's better looking and can afford a holiday
 
Flatulent_Bob said:
You mean apart from the post whereby I replied matching your numbering and giving you a response to each point you made?
You’re making yourself look a little daft now.

Anyway I wouldn’t want you to think I’m winding you up, and I can see the last word is important to you, so go ahead have another dig. I won’t repond and then you can go to bed and sleep soundly in the knowledge that you won.
You know even though you don’t care.
Click to expand...

I asked you ‘What purpose would ‘creating content to create a reaction’, as you accuse me, serve me exactly?’
 
McGrath said:
This is a strange thread.

Who knows what will happen ... but I think Wilder will move on if/when he feels he's taken us as far as he can and he leaves with his head held high.

BUT... I don't think Wilder is attractive to your average Championship club with £20 mill to spend. Boro aside, they're all owned by foreigners with more money than sense who want to bring some 'name' that gives their club and reputation some sort of imaginary status... Wilder just doesn't fit the bill
Click to expand...
Good reasoning ..he can come across as a rough diamond which isn' what some clubs want
 



You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Team for Sunday?
2 3
Replies
72
Views
5K
Keen Blade
Keen Blade
PaulPeschBlade
Paul Peschs side to Discombobulate the Blue Noses
Replies
12
Views
849
Northernsoulblade
Northernsoulblade
Tony Currie
What a difference the Manager makes at a club
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
Millhousesblade1889
Millhousesblade1889
Iffy Onuora's Shiny Head
Statistics 6 Years of SUFC Transfers
Replies
22
Views
1K
steve26272
steve26272
A
Presser v Oxford
Replies
19
Views
2K
reedy63
R

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom