wage budget

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Bit of a lesson from history - I remember the great side we had in 1971/72, topped the old Div 1 for about 6 games
The squad was thin and was crying out for investment which never came. The following season was the start of our decline culminating in relegation in 1976 and eventually down to Div 4 in 1981
Read into that what you want.....

We invested in the ground instead, if I remember rightly? 🤔
 



We invested in the ground instead, if I remember rightly? 🤔
Yep.
And looking at our current difficulty recruiting due to lack of finance , I wonder if any of those who wanted to prioritize ground expansion have now come to their senses ?
 
The wage structure has to be increased in line with other Premier League clubs otherwise we'll end up not being a Premier League club.

Anybody who rather we got relegated to keep the books balanced must still live with their mommy and be unemployed

I mean who else with such a lack of ambition and foresight could have struck out on their own from behind Mommy's apron strings
Burnley spent £80m on wages last year and still made a profit.

If your income is £132m a year, which ours was last year, you can afford £70m-£80m in wages. Based on 30 senior players. That is £52k per week per player on average, so a weekly wage structure of £65k to £35k a week depending on role etc.

We can be pretty ambitious and not totally fuck ourselves up if we are sensible.
 
True but if we don’t compete we will be back in the championship sooner or later
and if we break the bank we will end up like Bolton, Wigan and Sunderland, League One dwellers playing the kids on the brink of admin

I know which position i’d rather be in
 
I thought I was on the wrong site listening to fans telling their club to spend money they have not got. I thought I had wondered across the city to Sheff 6 but of course only they are stupid enough to want to go down that road AGAIN. ER hang on a min, I am on the right site !! We have had years feeding on scraps .we are not yet an established prem league .We have only had one season in the top flight and in that time we have payed around 90 mill out on players.Our owner has to find millions of pounds from somewhere to buy the whole infrastructure off the last owner and find loads of other money to up grade the ground and training facilities along with a new stadium for the lasses down the Cliffe while bank rolling CW targets.Now I realise it is easy spending other peoples money but our owner is not the wealthiest in the prem ,he can not be asked to find even more money with out some other guy coming on board to share the burden .He has done more than any one could hope in coughing up cash and backing the manager and all this without a punter coming through the turnstiles. We have to learn to walk before we can run ,Un like our neighbours who are a bit dim we should realise we are not a massive club and can not compete with the money guys who have been established in the top flight for years,but we are a very well run club and because of this we are in the best league in the world unlike others who spent money they had not got and payed a heavy price and are now nobodies in the world of soccer. Wigan, Swansea,Hull,Sunderland,SWFC,Coventry,Ipswich,Bolton,Blackburn even Leeds up to a few years ago all went that way spending what they had not got and look at them now.Nearly all of them went so close to being history.
 
What is with all these threads? Like fucking groundhog day on here recently
 
Do you think Chris Wilder should break the wage structure to keep the Blades in the premier league?
I think he should. I definitely do.what do you think fellow Blades.
Not sure if this is an option in the poll, but I'd go with don't break the wage structure, but still stay up and do rather well. Cheers.
 
I'll guarantee this.

If SUFC are relegated, there will be people on here who will say the club should have spent more and increased the wage structure.
It's no good asking for a level of success if there's a padlock on the biscuit tin. At some point, the financial outlook will have to change.

On another note, the folk of Sheffield do seem to be happy with a 'that'll do' attitude, you'll never go far with that outlook.
 
How many times its not about spending vast amounts say our top earner is 27k a week how can we go to a new level. If we won't break 40k a week you pay to get quality
 
I'll guarantee this.

If SUFC are relegated, there will be people on here who will say the club should have spent more and increased the wage structure.
It's no good asking for a level of success if there's a padlock on the biscuit tin. At some point, the financial outlook will have to change.

On another note, the folk of Sheffield do seem to be happy with a 'that'll do' attitude, you'll never go far with that outlook.
You are right it will change but only when the cash is there.Even the big clubs are now thinking very carefully before spending like they used to now that they have no money coming in from the turn styles .
 
Even the big clubs are now thinking very carefully before spending like they used to now that they have no money coming in from the turn styles .

Apart from Chelsea.
I think they'll be plenty more money spent before the window closes.
Wouldn't be shocked if SUFC make a couple more loan signings with options to buy.
 



40k a week is now not unreasonable
I was referring to your reference to “the next level “. There is no way we can yet be established as a top 8 club.
£40k a week for the squad plus NI contributions etc equates to around £65k before non playing salaries and other overheads are considered. We don’t have that sort of income yet.
 
How many times its not about spending vast amounts say our top earner is 27k a week how can we go to a new level. If we won't break 40k a week you pay to get quality
By signing someone who will take us further but not this calendar year. See what is happening with Berge and probably will with the two Derby lads
 
Is it actually an option to spend money we probably don't have?

Anyway, I put my trust in Wilder if he doesn't want to break the wage structure then that's fine with me.
 
If we want to progress of course we should as Chris Wilder has said there is no room for sentiment when trying to take the club forward.
When he said that !. he wasnt talking about wages.Its a matter of improving the squad ,as that gets better and stronger the wages rise along with it always staying within the perimeters which the budget permits.
Wilder has said this numerous times I dont know why it gets brought up.
Yes it could mean we get relegated ! No guarantee chasing the golden fleece would save us.
 
Before I answer, can you explain what our current wage budget is and how it compares to our peers in this league. I'd then be able to base my answer on a real situation rather than just guessing on what is happening like on so many threads before. You can probably get this from someone senior at United
I think that depends.....When we win, it’s in spite of the wage structure and the Herculean efforts of the players. When we lose, it’s because we only pay £4.80 a week and we need to pump the cash in. Let’s be honest, we are paying far more than we wish to believe because the David and Goliath story feels better, and because these players would be on their proverbial bike if not!
 
I think that depends.....When we win, it’s in spite of the wage structure and the Herculean efforts of the players. When we lose, it’s because we only pay £4.80 a week and we need to pump the cash in. Let’s be honest, we are paying far more than we wish to believe because the David and Goliath story feels better, and because these players would be on their proverbial bike if not!
Exactly.
 
Apart from Chelsea.
I think they'll be plenty more money spent before the window closes.
Wouldn't be shocked if SUFC make a couple more loan signings with options to buy.
May be but i think we are only allowed two loans and we all ready have one. May be wrong .
 
Speculate to accumalate has been the plan so far, keep doing it.
 
That is what Bolton, Stoke and Swansea did....


We're bigger than all three
But paying competitive wages has to happen regardless of the risk

If we can't or won't do it we'll get what we deserve
 
I’d rather we went down and still had a club than gambled everything on a year or two in the sun, cheers
This is, for me, a really tough dilemma. It's nearly 100 years since a trophy came the way of Bramall Lane or even a final
Do you think Chris Wilder should break the wage structure to keep the Blades in the premier league?
I think he should. I definitely do.what do you think fellow Blades.
Stick with wage structure & you sign players that can't even make the bench.
Villa signed 3 forwards. Everyone has improved their 1st 11 except us.
 
This is, for me, a really tough dilemma. It's nearly 100 years since a trophy came the way of Bramall Lane or even a final

Stick with wage structure & you sign players that can't even make the bench.
Villa signed 3 forwards. Everyone has improved their 1st 11 except us.

We are in a catch 22 situation which is best demonstrated by comparing us with Burnley. Burnley have a wage bill almost double that of United's. They hardly spend anything on wages. Essentially they do their money on wages.The owners invest no personal capital.
United do less than half their money on wages. We keep a tight stranglehold on wages. Our owners, like Burnley, have who won't invest any personal capital.We are run on the prem monies.
Bournemouth went down spending more on wages than Burnley, and more on fees than SUFC.The owner invested a lot of personal capital.

Which of the three do you want? If you want the Bournemouth option but to do it better, you want the Prince out. A lot of people on this board want the Prince out but are too afraid to say it.The logic is ineluctable when they want us to pay both the fees and the wages.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom