Tyler Durden
Well Loved Icon
- Banned
- #91
but Skye'd it
It didn't go that far did it!? Crikey.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
but Skye'd it
That's the strange thing about the acoustics of football grounds. We were at the Wimbledon game last week, standing on the home terrace on the same side of the ground as our "official" fans (i.e. 50 odd yards from the bulk of Blades) and you honestly wouldn't have known there were ANY away fans there, never mind 800 out of the 4,800. Even when we scored you couldn't hear a thing. Now please don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting for one minute that our fans were being quiet at Wimbledon - I KNOW that they weren't - just that the bizarre acoustics of football grounds sometimes mean that people don't always hear what you think they hear...
If you want, I can call P&G saying we're gonna win the league now we've won 4 on the bounce? I could. But that would make me delusional.
That's the strange thing about the acoustics of football grounds. We were at the Wimbledon game last week, standing on the home terrace on the same side of the ground as our "official" fans (i.e. 50 odd yards from the bulk of Blades) and you honestly wouldn't have known there were ANY away fans there, never mind 800 out of the 4,800. Even when we scored you couldn't hear a thing. Now please don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting for one minute that our fans were being quiet at Wimbledon - I KNOW that they weren't - just that the bizarre acoustics of football grounds sometimes mean that people don't always hear what you think they hear...
I find it strange that on the very day the kop were louder than they have been for a long time and created a great second half atmosphere, some people are specifically airing a contrary view that we were quiet.
It's either deluded or attention seeking.
Same as me.
What did we play? 98 mins. How many minutes did we sing for?? 2, 3 ? Seriously, it was quiet. You get the oohs and aahs, but there was no singing apart from the "singing section" of the Kop. I'm on Gangway F on south and its quiet, believe me. Quiet to the point where I can't sing even if I want to because there aren't enough people nearby singing so I'd ultimately be "that bloke" singing on his own.
Perfect answer right there. It sounds loud if you're in the thick of it. However, if you sit closer to the away end than the Kop like I do. You can be honest and say, we weren't as loud as people are making out. Apparently you're not a blade if you say that though.
Some people don't sit on the Kop so have a totally different perspective on things. My kids are loud as fuck, they give me headache. The next door neighbours can't hear them.
It's quieter than usual of late because up until 4 games ago, the performances have been shite-r than usual. Its almost like the fans don't trust United, like we won't come shit again. Nobody wants to be that bloke stood singing, getting his hopes up if we implode. Then you look like a wally that got carried away. A few more heartening performances should see that belief grow though. UTB.
Cheese sandwiches for Christmas lunch?. . . . . Now that would be a dream come true.Imagine Christmas Day. Cheese Sandwiches an' a bag o' crisps for lunch.
That's what this forum would be without Roygbiv sterling, now traditional, Saturday evening fayre.
X
He was standing behind us in the first half at Wimbledon last week; he sure can moan!
I didn't hear a single sound from the away fans all day, though to be fair I sit towards the back of the kop.
And the obligatory swipe at the perceived lack of activity from the crowd. I actually thought that we were in fine voice today considering the opposition.
Away supporters in Division 3 need to understand that for them, coming to a ground like Aesthetically Pleasing Downtown Bramall Lane might be a novelty, but for us it's like being the tallest kid in pre-school - not much to shout about.
I don't sit on the Kop either, so wasn't in the middle of it.
There was a long and loud rendition of 'when the blades go marching in', which grew in volume as the second half went on. There were several other loud songs throughout the second half and on a couple occasions 2 sections of the kop were loudly singing different songs at the same time. A long time since that has happened.
I sit in the same place every home game and can assure you that the noise from the kop that I heard was better than anything since the Spurs game.
What was particularly pleasing was that It didn't stem from a goal fest, or battering the opposition, it seemed to come from a growing belief that the players were finally putting in a shift and playing as a team in the way we expect them to play.
Not bothered about the opinions of the away support on this, but find it disappointing when blades go out of their way to criticise the volume of our support on the day the volume got cranked up for the first time in getting on for two years.
The noise from the crowd is growing as the desire and heart is showing on the pitch. We're in the sixth season at this level and 19,555 is fucking remarkable. As ever, highest in Division Three and higher than nine games in the Championship - including the 16,786 at Birmingham. (poor show from the Brum fans as I suppose 10k of that crowd were piggies?). Also less than 3k behind Hull v Arsenal and WBA v Spammers in the PL.
The numbers are what counts, not the volume. We're supporters not fucking choirboys.![]()
Peterborough deserved a point on the balance of play
It was an even game, therefore it's reasonable to say they deserved a point
That's a fair and well balanced report from the local rag which just goes to show that the bare statistics do not always tell the full story.Another perspective on the "did Peterboro deserve a point" debate - reporter on the Posh local rag reckoned the final score was "about right".
http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/...hat-expects-much-better-these-days-1-7582949?
But not so sure about the game being a "strangely subdued" one? Far from it, I thought. Suppose they've just got used to witnessing regular goalfests.
Like his comment about our "tremendous professionalism" in seeing the game out though. Another thing that's been sorely lacking in recent seasons which is starting to become a feature under the Wilder regime.
Another perspective on the "did Peterboro deserve a point" debate - reporter on the Posh local rag reckoned the final score was "about right".
http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/...hat-expects-much-better-these-days-1-7582949?
But not so sure about the game being a "strangely subdued" one? Far from it, I thought. Suppose they've just got used to witnessing regular goalfests.
Like his comment about our "tremendous professionalism" in seeing the game out though. Another thing that's been sorely lacking in recent seasons which is starting to become a feature under the Wilder regime.
The fact that most people have Moore as the MotM, says there must have been more than "weak speculative shots".That's a fair and well balanced report from the local rag which just goes to show that the bare statistics do not always tell the full story.
It's goals that count not the number of weak speculative shots from long distance heading in the direction of the goal.
I suspect that with our recent goalkeeper history, catching crosses more than 6ft from the goal-line would be enough!The fact that most people have Moore as the MotM, says there must have been more than "weak speculative shots".
The fact that most people have Moore as the MotM, says there must have been more than "weak speculative shots".
It's not a boxing match, you can't win on points as we found out at Bolton on the opening day.
The game is judged on goals alone.
We scored they didn't, therefore we deserve 3 points.
They may consider themselves unfortunate that's the way things panned out and I may have some sympathy with them but sometimes that's just the way it happens.
There was nothing unfair about the result.But we deserved a draw against Bolton
I know how football works, thanks.
I'm not saying they should have had a point for playing well I'm saying with the possession, shots on and general evenness of the match, a point would have been a fair result
Your last sentence pretty much says what you are arguing against.
if they had equalised would you have felt robbed?There was nothing unfair about the result.
We scored, they didn't.
We had no help from the officials, the goal shouldn't have been disallowed and they had no good goals chalked off.
The rest is just 11 v11 all doing their jobs to the best of their abilities, goalies included.
Nope.Ok
if they had equalised would you have felt robbed?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?