Roy's View From... View From Birmingham

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Lee Bowyer:- “If someone can tell me the rules have changed”:-​

Dear Mr Bowyer,
I draw your attention to the following law (not “rule”).
In the circumstances (ie your obvious and abject lack of knowledge understanding and indeed fundamental comprehension ) I have afforded you ‘special’ dispensation befitting such (apparent) circumstances.
Consequently, in this instance, you are permitted to:-

Follow the text with your index finger
Move your lips when ‘reading’
Draw diagrams ( you may know these as ‘pictures’)
Utilise ‘props’ to enhance visualisation - many people find condiment sets as helpful in this regard, eg salt & pepper pots as defenders; vinegar bottle as attacker; sauce (brown or red acceptable) as goalkeeper
Consult with equally insightful former professional footballer - I am led to believe that a Mr Andrew Hinchcliffe shares a similar (lack of) intellectual capacity to yourself, or alternatively a Mr Kieron Dyer
Remember to wear your ‘Sunflower’ lanyard

Every best wish

Remedial studies team.

LAW 11: OFFSIDE​

IFAB Laws of the Game 2021-22

Shares
The FA
Expand
Law 11 Offside

Offside position
It is not an offence to be in an offside position.

A player is in an offside position if:
  • any part of the head, body or feet is in the opponents’ half (excluding the halfway line) and
  • any part of the head, body or feet is nearer to the opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent
The hands and arms of all players, including the goalkeepers, are not considered. For the purposes of determining offside, the upper boundary of the arm is in line with the bottom of the armpit.
A player is not in an offside position if level with the:
  • second-last opponent or
  • last two opponents
Offside offence
A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by:
  • interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or
  • interfering with an opponent by:
  • preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
  • challenging an opponent for the ball or
  • clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or
  • making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
or
  • gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has:
  • rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar or an opponent
  • been deliberately saved by any opponent
A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage, unless it was a deliberate save by any opponent.
A ‘save’ is when a player stops, or attempts to stop, a ball which is going into or very close to the goal with any part of the body except the hands/arms (unless the goalkeeper within the penalty area).

In situations where:
  • a player moving from, or standing in, an offside position is in the way of an opponent and interferes with the movement of the opponent towards the ball this is an offside offence if it impacts on the ability of the opponent to play or challenge for the ball; if the player moves into the way of an opponent and impedes the opponent's progress (e.g blocks the opponent) the offence should be penalised under Law 12
  • a player in an offside position is moving towards the ball with the intention of playing the ball and is fouled before playing or attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball, the foul is penalised as it has occurred before the offside offence
  • an offence is committed against a player in an offside position who is already playing or attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball, the offside offence is penalised as it has occurred before the foul challenge
*The first point of contact of the 'play' or 'touch' of the ball should be used
 



Swings and round abouts, the hand ball was ball to hand, our penalty call was spot on ,and the picture was taken after the ball was kicked,
For once we got our just reward, end of story......
 
Made for good reading that. Pretty fair comments over all. Glad we've finally beaten them. Had to wait a while for it to come. Cheers Roy
 
The comments from the City fans are far more reasonable than those spouted by some of our own fans on other threads. I didn't think we were firing on all cylinders, but the all round performances are getting better as games go by. We are not a team who are going to score five, six or seven goals, but we have come back from a goal down to win a game of football. We should be basking in the warmth of that rather than picking spots off the players who got us that win.
Completely agree.

Berge and Fleck both infrequent starters that started for the first time in a while last night, and immediately the criticisms that they're not up to speed come flying in.

The longer the game went, the more they both grew into it, and they would both be at a higher level if they started regularly.

Playing games on a regular basis makes one hell of a difference.

Moving on to McBurnie, he came on, worked hard, did nowt wrong and is still copping pelters all over social media.

Some people have no idea of reality if they think players can just flit on and off the pitch and immediately perform at 100% the minute they are there.

I didn't expect that win last night and to come from behind was a real team effort and should be celebrated as such.

UTB
 
Made for good reading that. Pretty fair comments over all. Glad we've finally beaten them. Had to wait a while for it to come. Cheers Roy

When was the last time we beat them?
 
67th 🤣

Lee bowyer & birmingham fans seems to have a selective memory, as he fine with any injustice when N'Diaye is denied by the useless keith stroud. i dont see what Billy Sharp did was any different to players who charge down goal kicks. & added to that he didnt touch the ball so wasn't interfering with play. & then you got to look at the defending from the next phase of play
 
1dpV1FU.jpg


Okay, while not exactly forensic, it's pretty easy to establish the lines on Perspective needed to construct a VARlite. He's On.

Establishing perspective on a 2D image at 5am on a Saturday. You’re an example to us all. :)
Ron_Justice now can you prove that the moon is made from green cheese please 😉

( not a dig btw but you can prove anything if you only look at the evidence that you want to see and in the way that you want to see it, ask any 1970's copper 😉 )
 



Ron_Justice now can you prove that the moon is made from green cheese please 😉

( not a dig btw but you can prove anything if you only look at the evidence that you want to see and in the way that you want to see it, ask any 1970's copper 😉 )
I mean, perspective is empirical. It either is or it isn't. 🤷‍♂️
 
Whinging fucks , did they comment when they had 2 goalkeepers at the Lane , and we were denied a clear cut penalty after one of their out field players saved the ball
Nope ? Thought not
Fuck em
 
Mostly fair comments BUT Roberts had been made a fool all night by Nidaye with his beautiful skill full play. Roberts is a thug and for grabbing him around the neck and persisting doing it then it should have been a straight red

Thanks Roy
Well said, if they had the beloved VAR that they crave then that was a red card, but it's likeky that he wouldn't have been on the pitch because he'd have also got a red card last Saturday, if the Holy grail of justice VAR was in use..
 
In which case they need to have a serious word with the groundsman about getting the half way line straight 😉
I suspect that distortion is to do with the TV camera's Lens. That's why I thought it prudent to use more than two lines from the pitch to generate the vanishing point. Building in a bit of redundancy.
 
I suspect that distortion is to do with the TV camera's Lens. That's why I thought it prudent to use more than two lines from the pitch to generate the vanishing point. Building in a bit of redundancy.
🤣

I give up.

You're taking this far too seriously

UTB
 



"Mengi looked like he had just got off the subbuteo table"

Pissin' mesen! Love this!

pommpey
 
Thanks Roy,

This made me laugh

“That’s even worse then in a way. If Sharpe wasn’t there then Ethers could have just stayed in his area and caught the ball. What a ridiculous thing that linesman has said”

So Sharp is at the centre circle edge when the ball is played out, by a SUFC player, Ethers actually came out and headed it just outside the box no where near Sharp. So why didnt he just let it bounce and catch it in the box. They dont half talk bollards in the "North of England". There is no reason at all for their goalkeeper to head the ball.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom