VAR to be used in Championship Play Off's.

[Selly]

I'd say we were probably fortunate that VAR wasn't in use today.

Fleck could easily have seen his yellow upgraded to a red.

And there's a hint of arm involved in the goal we did get.

 

[Champagneblade]

Thought we could have been 1-0 up courtesy of a penalty and the game would have played out completely differently.

 

[Selly]

Thought we could have been 1-0 up courtesy of a penalty and the game would have played out completely differently.

A good point. Forgot about that.

 

[blade67]

What is the point of VAR, with all the associated disruption and delay if they still get so manty decisions wrong.

Real's disallowed goal yesterday and the 2nd penalty appeal today both seem completely wrong to me.

 

[Blend-it-like-Harris]

Hudds certainly should have had a penalty or two today, though they were so shite they didn't really deserve anything from that game.

 

[Headshrinker]

Another scandalous VAR incident yesterday:

 

[jt64]

Frankly VAR not giving Ukraine a penalty was worse

 

[Bladesman]

VAR tech is fine its just the clowns in the VAR room.

 

[Working Class Hero]

VAR tech is fine its just the clowns in the VAR room.

No one doubts that video replays work, they've been in use for about 100 years. VAR is literally crap referees, refereeing crap referees. Bin it.

 

[Snowflake]

No one doubts that video replays work, they've been in use for about 100 years. VAR is literally crap referees, refereeing crap referees. Bin it.

No ! Get rid of the crap users and get it used properly, pitch side.

 

[Stu_Blade]

Another major problem with video tech in football is the lack of natural breaks, in cricket you have the bowler and out or not out the ball isn't in play, with rugby try or no try ball isn't in play. VAR is trying to do too much and has lost its purpose if you are looking at penalty or no penalty then the ball needs to be dead so either the ball is handed to the opposition if no penalty or something. Personally I think it just needs to stick with goal or no goal as in over the line or not

 

[BettingBlade]

The bloke in the VAR room has to second guess whether he thinks the referee has made a clear and obvious error. Thats where the problem is.

Why cant they just look at an incident together and go….”yeah thats a penalty”? Instead of someone going oh well I think it could be a penalty but the ref has probably seen it and thought no its not a penalty and therefore I cant tell him that I think he should look at it again.

Fuck me if you think its a pen tell him….have a look at it together….and then let him make the decision. Clear and obvious errors and all that bollocks, in rugby the ref will often go to the fella upstairs “look I think I saw something there but I’m mot sure can we have a look”.