kop_blade9
Member
Yes. Not sacking the latter before the Premier season being the most damaging of all.
View attachment 36895
Hindsight is a wonderful thing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Yes. Not sacking the latter before the Premier season being the most damaging of all.
View attachment 36895
Why would you sack a manager who's just got you promoted?
How did you know he wouldn't be able to make the step up?Because he wasn't able to take the step up, one of McC's biggest mistakes.
And we wouldn't have sacked him, a 350K pay off would have been a good deal for both parties.
Mate, come one, considering the budget he had to play with (no to mention the Tevez Affair, The Hulse Injury, etc, etc). The fact that we only got relegated in the final 40 minutes of the season, and on goal difference (by one goal!). The guy is a fucking genius! But I understand, not everyone likes owd Colin. But you've got to admit, they were some of the best times ever as a Blade
Mate, come one, considering the budget he had to play with (no to mention the Tevez Affair, The Hulse Injury, etc, etc). The fact that we only got relegated in the final 40 minutes of the season, and on goal difference (by one goal!). The guy is a fucking genius! But I understand, not everyone likes owd Colin. But you've got to admit, they were some of the best times ever as a Blade
Mate, come one, considering the budget he had to play with (no to mention the Tevez Affair, The Hulse Injury, etc, etc). The fact that we only got relegated in the final 40 minutes of the season, and on goal difference (by one goal!). The guy is a fucking genius! But I understand, not everyone likes owd Colin. But you've got to admit, they were some of the best times ever as a Blade
This is basically how I see it too. I didn't enjoy the football but I respected what he was trying to do on a budget. I differ in that I couldn't see the point of him leaving after we got relegated. He was the sort of guy we should have been appointing at that moment - even tho back then his reputation was not quite as good as it is now.We had one magical season where individuals were fantastic and we had my favourite ever United match (Forest 2nd leg). I'm still sticking to my point that Warnocks core football is dour percentage stuff and his attitude is awful. Hed very much run his course by the time he left
Especially to Curtis!I think it's always wise before hitting the 'Post Reply' button to ask
'Would I say this to his face?'
I think he had to leave because he was sick of United and the club/fans were tired of his "woe is me" act.This is basically how I see it too. I didn't enjoy the football but I respected what he was trying to do on a budget. I differ in that I couldn't see the point of him leaving after we got relegated. He was the sort of guy we should have been appointing at that moment - even tho back then his reputation was not quite as good as it is now.
I think he had to leave because he was sick of United and the club/fans were tired of his "woe is me" act.
His ego outgrew his ability a long time ago. I think he'd have been fired by Xmas if he'd stayed. He was the right type of manager for the situation - but not with United. All sense of humility had left him by that time
That is how I saw it that season too. All managers have their level and in my opinion Warnock is a good Championship manager. It will be interesting to see how Cardiff handle him if they get promoted as his record in the top flight is poor.
I think appointing Robson was the most damaging.Yes. Not sacking the latter before the Premier season being the most damaging of all.
View attachment 36895
I think appointing Robson was the most damaging.
Yes. Not sacking the latter before the Premier season being the most damaging of all.
View attachment 36895
Without hindsight, I'm not sure many fans would have wanted Warnock sacked after getting us promoted
He wasn't sacked, his contract wasn't renewed which is a little different and it was after relegation.
The promotion 12 months previously had been blown by his poor buys and negative tactics.
In retrospect of course he should have stayed. Anyone would have been better than Mogadon Man, but it feeled right to me that Warnock should leave in May 2007.
All good points but Wilder wouldn’t go down with a whimper and everybody knows that.The point I was responding to was to Pinchy stating Warnock should have been sacked on promotion to the PL in May 2006 (not following relegation), which as I say, with hindsight may have been a positive move although we'd never be able to say exactly what would have happened because we don't know who we would have got in for that PL season without Warnock.
Although to add to the point about hindsight, at that time Warnock had never had a go at the PL, so we weren't to know how much he didn't understand what was needed and perhaps romantically thought he deserved a go at it as a fellow Blade getting us promoted.
I wonder what we'd say about Wilder if he failed in his first season in the PL.
All good points but Wilder wouldn’t go down with a whimper and everybody knows that.
So which is it ?: "before the Premier season" or in January.He wasted his January budget on a bunch of useless articles when we needed one premiership quality midfielder.
Not a good one, of course, but if we’d had the courage to sack OBN and appointed a manager with some Premiership know-how, Robson may well not have happened.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?