Sam Curtis

[robbiez666]

Not when the window closed. When this window closes we have another option hopefully. If we play him he can't move.

So, it's fine to drop points because we don't want to harm his development by playing for a team in Scotland?

We could have used him for several games in January while we had no RB alternative. Could have protected Gilchrist. Could have not rushed Seriki back, which seems to have screwed him. Could have no pushed Peck to play RB or Brewster sodding CM.

But this is all irrelevant because we might sign a RB?

 

[CirenBlade]

So, it's fine to drop points because we don't want to harm his development by playing for a team in Scotland?

We could have used him for several games in January while we had no RB alternative. Could have protected Gilchrist. Could have not rushed Seriki back, which seems to have screwed him. Could have no pushed Peck to play RB or Brewster sodding CM.

But this is all irrelevant because we might sign a RB?

Clearly the management, coaching and recruitment team don't believe he's currently the answer. You seem to be the only person who believes he should be getting first team minutes. Sometimes it's ok not to have the last word.

 

[Slim Man]

So, it's fine to drop points because we don't want to harm his development by playing for a team in Scotland?

We could have used him for several games in January while we had no RB alternative. Could have protected Gilchrist. Could have not rushed Seriki back, which seems to have screwed him. Could have no pushed Peck to play RB or Brewster sodding CM.

But this is all irrelevant because we might sign a RB?

What's the point in playing him for a few minutes, when we have a RB coming in, to not develop him for 6 months? Crazy

I'm all for kids playing, see Blacker last night, but not to spite their development entirely when they're offered the chance to play SPL football for 6 months. Would've been a mental decision

 

[robbiez666]

Clearly the management, coaching and recruitment team don't believe he's currently the answer. You seem to be the only person who believes he should be getting first team minutes. Sometimes it's ok not to have the last word.

But, hey, a 16 year old got game minutes, so he's the answer?

 

[Berkshire Blade]

So, it's fine to drop points because we don't want to harm his development by playing for a team in Scotland?

We could have used him for several games in January while we had no RB alternative. Could have protected Gilchrist. Could have not rushed Seriki back, which seems to have screwed him. Could have no pushed Peck to play RB or Brewster sodding CM.

But this is all irrelevant because we might sign a RB?

He's not good enough for league one. I think you are overthinking it here.

 

[Slim Man]

But, hey, a 16 year old got game minutes, so he's the answer?

He got minutes because it was a) a dead rubber, b) those game minutes don't stop him from making a loan move to develop for the next 6 months, c) he's not ready for a loan move anyway.

It's a strange hill to die on, this.

 

[Racing Blade]

Played full 90 in the 1-0 win over Celtic today. Despite their impending relegation, St Johnstone seem to have improved for him being there and he has a Scottish Cup semi-final around the corner.

All in all, much better experience than the Peterborough loan.

 

[Frank the tank]

Played full 90 in the 1-0 win over Celtic today. Despite their impending relegation, St Johnstone seem to have improved for him being there and he has a Scottish Cup semi-final around the corner.

All in all, much better experience than the Peterborough loan.

I just watched that game and didn't even know he was playing till you told me

 

[Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn]

I just watched that game and didn't even know he was playing till you told me

Aye
Take that as a positive - he didn’t make any ricks,