Brownieblade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2019
- Messages
- 5,827
- Reaction score
- 4,263
I think we are seeing a lot of overacting to not having someone lined up for Anel
I’m not saying it’s ideal or hasn’t been a pain, it clearly has
But having a plan of we will sell Anel if we get a bid we can’t turn down then rely on JLT before getting a loan in, I don’t think that was a total screw up either, I can see logic of it
I don’t know if we had a replacement or not but there is never guaranteed deal unless you vastly over pay or you have something others don’t
So using Hamer as example, I think the reason it was so quick was it was lined up whilst selling Berger was we could offer prem stage plus higher wages than anyone else realistically interested
I don’t think we had any targets where we really where the best move for someone
Now to counter that I think it’s more than fair to question selling Anel at that point
But not having a direct replacement already guaranteed I don’t think is a huge screw up, I think sometimes you just have to work within market
I’m not saying it’s ideal or hasn’t been a pain, it clearly has
But having a plan of we will sell Anel if we get a bid we can’t turn down then rely on JLT before getting a loan in, I don’t think that was a total screw up either, I can see logic of it
I don’t know if we had a replacement or not but there is never guaranteed deal unless you vastly over pay or you have something others don’t
So using Hamer as example, I think the reason it was so quick was it was lined up whilst selling Berger was we could offer prem stage plus higher wages than anyone else realistically interested
I don’t think we had any targets where we really where the best move for someone
Now to counter that I think it’s more than fair to question selling Anel at that point
But not having a direct replacement already guaranteed I don’t think is a huge screw up, I think sometimes you just have to work within market