blade.i.am
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2014
- Messages
- 2,003
- Reaction score
- 3,079
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Who would you buy to strengthen us? Lenihan £1.5, Hugill £2m, Leonard £550,000 or Diagouraga. Martinez £1m.
YYYYYAAAAAWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN gerrit spentIt needn't burn any hole at all and it doesn't have to be spent just because it's there. If CW can't see the right players who 'fit' he won't spend for the sake of it.
Is that slightly racist?View attachment 28616 . Get a lot of these for £6m
'apporth – short for halfpennyworthof course "daft apeth" is a friendly greeting between 2 chaps.
whereas "pal" is forum speak for putting on a stone island coat and bouncing around on your toes waving em in, safe in the knowledge the 200 bobby's stood between you will ensure your white trainers will not get dirty.
Pretty much sure that we're getting 10% of the profit, so that's 2 million gone already.
Has it been said anywhere that CW will get any of the money to spend? As it's not money he's generated I wouldn't be surprised if he sees none of it.
One and a half million for harry maguire? Don't know if that is accurate but it would be taking tge total to around six millionJust curious as to why you've inflated this figure to £6M? Walker has moved for a fee of £45M. We stand to get 10% of that, there or thereabouts. Move the decimal point to the left then and you get £4.5M, not £6M. You could be starting an urban myth here with these kind of maths....
Anyhow...
I'd definitely go for a young centre half (Lenihan appears to fit that bill well actually), an aggressive ball-winning midfielder, a wide player with lightning pace and a goalkeeper to challenge Moore for the first team jersey. What they would cost...who knows?
I didn't realise they went so overboard! The only way to stop that is to stop them getting promoted because the enormous gamble has basically worked for them and they are on a different stratosphere to us financially as a result.I'd rather steer clear of comparisons with the way Bournemouth "spend in ways that are relative to where they're having to compete" if I'm totally honest.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36189779
Though I do get the sentiment.
btw, does anyone know if it's gross or net profit?
I didn't realise they went so overboard! The only way to stop that is to stop them getting promoted because the enormous gamble has basically worked for them and they are on a different stratosphere to us financially as a result.
Financial "fair play" then plays in to the hands of the relegated prem teams as their parachute payments give them a ridiculous advantage, probably akin to trebling our turnover.
But you've only got £6m, you're going to have to put 2 of the hot dogs back.3 hotdogs and a packet of Maltesers from Cineworld.
They can't. It's been suggested that if financial fair play was challenged in the European courts it would be overturned. Is there any other industry where you can buy a business but you're limited in what you're allowed to invest? I think PSG were set to challenge it and Platini was talking about relaxing it because he knew PSG would win then the FIFA thing blew up and it seems to be in limbo.The football authorities won't do anything major about overspending, managerial bungs or anything seedy for fear that it will tarnish the "brand" they've built.
They can't. It's been suggested that if financial fair play was challenged in the European courts it would be overturned. Is there any other industry where you can buy a business but you're limited in what you're allowed to invest? I think PSG were set to challenge it and Platini was talking about relaxing it because he knew PSG would win then the FIFA thing blew up and it seems to be in limbo.
I suspect they won't issue any big penalties for breaches because that would encourage a club to mount a legal challenge.
Couldn't agree more but they did introduce the benefactor model into SCMP which I thought was a good idea. It allowed owners to put money into the club but stopped them adding to the debt, even as 'soft loans'. Which I always thought should have been the aim of FFP; stop owners from putting a club's future in jeopardy Leeds-style.Then they should just admit it. They've never had a problem initiating action against smaller or lower league clubs without financial clout. McCabe showed them up for what they are, a spineless bunch when the shit hits the fan.
They won't because a lot of people won't go. I won't pay Wendy prices, for example. I could but I won't.If they do well this coming season there could also be another big increase in revenue for the club if they chose to go down the Wendy route and give a big rise to ST prices .
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?