Just back from Oxford, and listened to Wilder’s post match interview
They were a poor side and we made em look like a mid Championship side.
When a side with much the better players and squad loses to a side much worse than them, you have to question, the team selection and tactics.
For me, Wilder picked a side to slow play down, and nullify them, rather than, playing to our strengths.We didn’t really have a go until we were one down and we were way too casual in the first half.The tactics of keeping it tight, and then expecting to gain a 1-0 win, with a bit of quality up front, is all well and good against decent opposition. But this lot were there for the taking, if we’d have had a go from the off.
For me O’Hare starts before Brewster, he links much better with Hamer, our bit of class.I know Brewster scored against Wednesdsy and we love him for it, but there’s a reason O’Hare has started in front of him all season.Vini before Choudury all day long for me, if we are looking to get on top of a team.
In the end Wilder just resorted to throwing all his subs on, in the hope of a breakthrough, which didn’t materialise.Wilder has got us into a helluva position, no question, and he deserves much credit for that, but it doesn’t make him above criticism when he gets it wrong.Just for once it would be refreshing when he got things wrong,as he did today,he accepted a bit of the blame for it in his reflections.
I sat in their South Stand, as I couldn’t get a ticket for the away end, and they couldn’t believe their eyes in the first half as we sat back and let them come on to us.They celebrated like it was a Cup final win at the final whistle.