Would the Cat1 Academy make that much of a difference. We are attracting young talent because they can see the potential to actually play first team football. We also attract because we are successful and have talented youngsters.
Arblaster, Peck, Brooks, Seriki have all come through despite us not being Cat1
To answer your question, yes a Cat1 Academy would improve recruitment and retention of quality young prospects. Right now, it’s too easy for a senior Cat 1 Academy to poach prospects like Lankshear.
The only reason young players might see first team possibilities with us, is because the manager has no other option than to put our best prospects in the first team squad!
This is simply a lack of funding to develop a Cat 1 Academy at SUFC, and no finance available to buy ready made, EPL quality players to make the squad viable, and provide cover for injuries, suspensions and loss of form!
Wilder has already stated that he ‘hopes’ for at least two loan signings in the JTW, and even that is now doubtful. Even if he does get 2 on loan, that is just more shorttermism to get the current squad into the EPL.
Even with finance, the prospect of another poor season at the top remains a possibility. Even if Arblaster, and possibly one current academy player are deemed good enough, it’s still a gamble.
The much heralded ‘takeover’ is from an investment company. The word investment means they are looking to make money from the take over, eventually.
A Cat 1 Academy is essential to the long term aspirations of the club. It offers the club protection and helps with recruitment.
Personally I like seeing young players promoted from within, and Academy Status is a worthwhile investment for the club and the players who join it.
This season is exciting, but it could make or break them, depending where they are in their development cycle. Sadly, we are only doing it because we are skint!