Your point is ? Shall we sign no one then ?
Absolutely not - I'm commenting on the notion of punting Sharp & McGoldrick now as has been advocated
An additional goalscorer (be damned if I'll ever use the term 'striker' in a football context) would be ( more than) useful but ......
Buying 3 is likely more costly than 1 ? (Even with any 'saving' on Billy's & Didz salaries
We cant ( apparently / allegedly) attract ONE "decent striker" ( sic) let alone 3
Replacing B & D wholly overlooks their other contributions to the team/club (togetherness/ commitment/ example / experience etc etc etc)
Difficult enough to introduce / incorporate 1 ' new face' let alone your 3 forwards + Ramsdale + competition cover for George + the 'creative' midfielder' most folk say we need
Which quality new forwards are going to be keen to sign as to 2nd choice / back up ? Or should we punt Mouss & McB too - still leaves a disgruntled 3rd
Eze may be a perfect "long term replacement for McG but in the current financial environment is that a priority at present ? Implicitly you are acknowledging that McG is not 'done' yet ?
The PL money can't / doesn't just fund recruitment (& retention - which has significantly increased new contracts / 'bonus' for staying up) & in essence we've already spent some of the summer budget in January (Berge)
Also upgrading facilities & just taken on a 30m mortgage & still having to pay the gas & 'leccy
Realise that's more than 1 point but trust it assists