Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
What sort of pitch do you prefer us to play on?
We do have the best home record in the Division and , reading between the lines , the gaffer seems to prefer the sumptuous and dependable Desso .
But , if the rumours are true and we had to sell Murphy , Maguire , DCL , Che Adams and Ramsdale to pay for it is it REALLY worth it ?
I think the Charlton cup game was close to being called off due to the state of the pitch in the south west corner. That probably triggered the Desso pitch decision. If you look at Oxford away, the pitch influenced our team selection with Carruthers on the bench rather than starting and Bristol away was another game where we struggled to get the passes flowing. It's definitely helping our football at home and reduces the chance of postponements.
We do have the best home record in the Division and , reading between the lines , the gaffer seems to prefer the sumptuous and dependable Desso .
But , if the rumours are true and we had to sell Murphy , Maguire , DCL , Che Adams and Ramsdale to pay for it is it REALLY worth it ?
What next? Rory McIlroy demands the windmill be removed from the twelfth green?
coolhandluke Yes, it is an interesting subject but do we really need multiple threads on it so posters can repeat their previous posts?
No.
Its actually a fascinating debate ...... seriously .
It goes to the very heart of what individual Blades believe is the right , or wrong way to run our Football Club .
Should ALL available cash be used to strengthen the playing side ?
What about facilities for us fans ? What about the Academy ? And yes , what about the pitch ? Are they worthwhile investments or is it money that should all go towards the playing side ? Afterall , its what happens on the pitch thats the sole arbeiter of success isnt it ?
Personally speaking , i am forced to concede that if we judge McCabe on whats happening on the field of play only , then his tenure , at this particular moment in time , has been a failure as he took over in the Championship and we are now League 1 .
Is this really a full and fair assessment of his tenure though ? What about the ground , its better now than its ever been . The facilities are better than they've ever been ( Kop aside , though i reckon theres movement afoot to rectify this ) . The Academy continues to provide first class training facilities for the first team whilst at the same time producing a steady crop of talented youngsters .
Lets not forget the playing side aswell . If we are promoted this season , bearing in mind McCabe took over the Club in the Championship , with all of the ' off field ' improvements indicated above mean we are all forced to concede that at the very worst McCabes tenure has been ' steady ' .
I might change my opinion from last weeks Desso thread just to keep things interesting.
I think the argument of the anti-desso posters (I’m sure they’ll correct me if I’m wrong) is not that ground improvements such as the desso should be completely ignored but that they should be entirely secondary to getting the playing staff up to an acceptable standard. I don’t think anyone can argue that we’ve punched our weight for the last six season. I gather that their position is that everything should go towards rectifying that particular ailment before directing resource to improving the ground. Once we are an established championship club and are enjoying the additional revenue that brings, we can consider ground improvement. I’m not certain as so much of it descends into petty personal arguments (both sides) but I think that is the basis of their argument.
Maybe theres a simple unifying principle in all of this ? Lets have money spent on the playing the side AND spent on facilities ? Or is this being far too unrealistic ? McCabe did want to take control and he does have the Prince to lean upon . Or should we be thankful that despite the fact that McCabes got us to where we are we havent effectively imploded like Coventry , Blackpool , Portsmouth etc etc etc have done ?
But the recruitment THIS season shows that if you have the right manager, you can get the players you need, a Desso pitch and still have money to further invest in players.I think the argument of the anti-desso posters (I’m sure they’ll correct me if I’m wrong) is not that ground improvements such as the desso should be completely ignored but that they should be entirely secondary to getting the playing staff up to an acceptable standard. I don’t think anyone can argue that we’ve punched our weight for the last six season. I gather that their position is that everything should go towards rectifying that particular ailment before directing resource to improving the ground. Once we are an established championship club and are enjoying the additional revenue that brings, we can consider ground improvement. I’m not certain as so much of it descends into petty personal arguments (both sides) but I think that is the basis of their argument.
As I recall Pete, you were too yellow-bellied to have an opinion last week. Come on; nail your colours to the mast!
But the recruitment THIS season shows that if you have the right manager, you can get the players you need, a Desso pitch and still have money to further invest in players.
(As Dane just said as I was writing this)
Indeed but perhaps for that to happen, you need a situation to arise whereby you have £4million worth of talent that you can sell without massively weakening the first team.
Thats where the Academy steps in . But shouldnt we be holding on to the talent that comes through the Academy ? Or is that , once again , being unrealistic while we are in League 1 . The Academy , for me , is one of the Clubs greatest ever investments , but even i get pissed off when we let the products WE have produced go season after season .
Now, look here. I watched all those YouTube videos of the pitch being laid and I can confirm that the contractors finished the job. If they hadn't, it might explain some of the poor results on the Desso....all we have to do now is finish the job.
Move the thread?Am sure there must be a connection between yet another Desso thread and an analogy about watching grass grow.
Can anyone help?
The OP title deserves this to be bounced.
If you have just seen the Shrewsbury v West Ham 3rd round tie, then the Shews pitch was covered in grass, no bald patches, no soggy areas, yet it played like a ploughed field and it brought West Ham down 2 levels.
Desso defo worth it.
UTB
I'm tempted to suggest that any pitch bringing that lot down a couple of levels is something we should all aspire to.
I which case, I'd rather have kept hold of Duffy than made final payment on the Desso![]()
Just think,had we not had to sell Duff to pay for the Desso,he might have scored at Hillsborough in our 3-2 win
He'd have been pivotal if we'd kept him. I'm sure he'd have been a regular MotM, and would've meant we hadn't had to rely on Carruthers, too. I think we'd have been top 6 (or 7).
Bloody pitch.
![]()
I really miss our ploughed pitch and,match postponements
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?