Sean Thornton
I say a little prayer….
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2015
- Messages
- 62,192
- Reaction score
- 106,065
In the words of John Terry
I have many black friends so can’t be racist, just ask my mate Ashley Cole.
As opposed to rascist.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
In the words of John Terry
I have many black friends so can’t be racist, just ask my mate Ashley Cole.
As opposed to rascist.
Super Chedwyn Evans? No, I wouldn't say so.
There is that one, yes, but the one I'm referring to names the woman involved in his case. And no, one vile song doesn't justify any other vile chant - that rationale is a big part of the problem.
I would imagine that's just the way John Terry spells it, it is a direct quotation after all
Surely you are risking upsetting vegetarians eating such large quantities?
Have you no feelings?
Are you saying you can't ever see the funny side in a "sexist"/"racist" joke?
I thought it was a good question
The one you are referring to hasn’t been heard for a long time, probably 3 years at least and I never physically heard it being sang in a ground.
The Evie Wilder chants were widespread, heard in several places, and the pathetic campaign about her has been widespread over social media.
You’re newspaper ran a story on social media about a Manchester United supporter who made an offensive tweet about Hillsborough, and named his employer and contact them for comment,
There are plenty of comments about Evie Wilder, from people who it is easy to find out who are they are where they work. Surely as a local newspaper it would be in your interest to also report on that.
That is unless you are fearful of upsetting Chansiri, which to see goes against the ethos of journalism
The one you are referring to hasn’t been heard for a long time, probably 3 years at least and I never physically heard it being sang in a ground.
The Evie Wilder chants were widespread, heard in several places, and the pathetic campaign about her has been widespread over social media.
You’re newspaper ran a story on social media about a Manchester United supporter who made an offensive tweet about Hillsborough, and named his employer and contact them for comment,
There are plenty of comments about Evie Wilder, from people who it is easy to find out who are they are where they work. Surely as a local newspaper it would be in your interest to also report on that.
That is unless you are fearful of upsetting Chansiri, which to see goes against the ethos of journalism
The one you are referring to hasn’t been heard for a long time, probably 3 years at least and I never physically heard it being sang in a ground.
The Evie Wilder chants were widespread, heard in several places, and the pathetic campaign about her has been widespread over social media.
You’re newspaper ran a story on social media about a Manchester United supporter who made an offensive tweet about Hillsborough, and named his employer and contact them for comment,
There are plenty of comments about Evie Wilder, from people who it is easy to find out who are they are where they work. Surely as a local newspaper it would be in your interest to also report on that.
That is unless you are fearful of upsetting Chansiri, which to see goes against the ethos of journalism
Aren't maggots fish?
It's a minefield this trying not to upset anyone lark,ain't it?
It's a good question, because without wishing to contradict myself, I suppose that the answer is not binary, but nuanced. It's about the joke and who's telling it; the balance of power and the intended consequence of the joke. Also I suspect my definition of those words differ/is different to the next person. Having thought about it, I can identify personal hypocrisies.
I'd say a definite 'no' if the jokes are based on lazy caricature, exaggerated accents, stereotypical physical characteristics, contain pejorative terms and the 'ism' is the punchline.
However, 'yes' if it's the topic, as an example the father ted sketch and the phoenix nights folk group.
To confuse things even more, there's an ambiguous area of eddie murphy and richard prior.
My tastes have changed over the years, I've laughed at jokes that I wouldn't do now, but I was never interested in bernard manning style gags, he had his audience, I wasn't in it. My tastes are george carlin, bill hicks and doug stanhope, and part of the delay in me answering was remembering the contents of their jokes.
But as i've said i'm not the moral guardian of the country & it's each to their own.![]()
Aren't maggots fish?
It's a good question, because without wishing to contradict myself, I suppose that the answer is not binary, but nuanced. It's about the joke and who's telling it; the balance of power and the intended consequence of the joke. Also I suspect my definition of those words differ/is different to the next person. Having thought about it, I can identify personal hypocrisies.
I'd say a definite 'no' if the jokes are based on lazy caricature, exaggerated accents, stereotypical physical characteristics, contain pejorative terms and the 'ism' is the punchline.
However, 'yes' if it's the topic, as an example the father ted sketch and the phoenix nights folk group.
To confuse things even more, there's an ambiguous area of eddie murphy and richard prior.
My tastes have changed over the years, I've laughed at jokes that I wouldn't do now, but I was never interested in bernard manning style gags, he had his audience, I wasn't in it. My tastes are george carlin, bill hicks and doug stanhope, and part of the delay in me answering was remembering the contents of their jokes.
But as i've said i'm not the moral guardian of the country & it's each to their own.![]()
Bang on mate, Chansiri's said no
Have you solved the rail strike yet?
A bit like your role in journalism and your remit not to do anything to upset Sheffield Wednesday
Quite obviously that's the case here.![]()
Considering you seem intent on insisting that United fans can do no wrong, ask yourself who's the biased one here?
Rubbish! I heard it last, the last time Ched played. There are still sections of our support who think it's ok to name the girl, state she likes anal sex and is a prostitute.The one you are referring to hasn’t been heard for a long time, probably 3 years at least and I never physically heard it being sang in a ground.
Rubbish! I heard it last, the last time Ched played. There are still sections of our support who think it's ok to name the girl, state she likes anal sex and is a prostitute.
The 2 things need to be kept separate. One type of song/chant/tweet is illegal as well as offensive, and most fans would want them eliminating, whether it is the recent ones from S6, or the ones from S2 around the Ched trial. (I am looking forward to his return, and I am not in an anti-Ched camp). If people want to claim the moral high ground for us, that is not the main point. These sorts of things need stamping out, full-stop.One is a song that has been sang by Unitedites for years, celebrating our ability to drink copious amounts of beer, and the fact that being a Blademan improves your chances of having sexual intercourse with members of the opposite sex, and up until this conjuncture it hasn’t been a problem or offended anybody.
The Wednesday pondlife managed to engaged the collective two brain cells and come up with the ditty. “Chrissy Wilder, his daughters a slag”, as well as engaging in a pretty horrendous and vile internet campaign of abuse and it is effectively slag shaming, not forgetting threatening the partner of a Wednesday cult hero when she stood up to a young woman being publicly named a slag in a football match.
Suddenly it becomes a huge issue for both clubs. Well it isn’t. It is a problem for one side of the city, and certain elements of that side of the city need exposure, need to be contrition and you could have been the man do that, but you’ve missed a trick. So why is it a huge problem for us as well as them, or don’t your organ grinders want the monkey to start flinging shit.
Where have i said that United fans can do no wrong?
With the 'I've not heard it for three years so it can't happen' line despite a fair few others on this thread alone hearing it regularly.
Do you genuinely believe the problem of sexist chants is solely a Wednesday one, because of the latest example of it?
We havent commisioned any new songs
theres a few golden oldies still sung its hard to justify
but many ditties from the seventies that were chart hits have some very dubious lyrics
its how you context itSo if it was okay in the 70s, it's okay now?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?