Samuels.. McCabe hits back

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




As soon as the article title read 'a national newspaper' I was sure it'd be that hypocrite
 
Cant we sue Martin Samuels?

That fat bastard is really starting to get on my nerves.
 
It's about time the fat b@stard got sued for every penny he owns, the knob jockey's lies and innuendo's are really starting to get on my tits. :mad:
 
Breathe my Blades brethren... for vengeance is a dish best served smothered in Hendersons relish ;)
 
I'm surprised McCabe is getting so hacked off (see what I did there?). He's only one journalist, and after all, most journos (in particular sports writers) are fluent in talking out of their derrieres.

West Ham have had a vast array of journalists and tabloid newspapers writing inaccurate article after inaccurate article over the so called Tevez affair (he was ineligible being the most popular line - that was never the case). This is only one journalist. A little decorum from Saint McCabe perhaps? He seems a little rattled by the prattling on of a fat West Ham fan with a typewriter?
 
I think it's just the constant sniping from the corpulent illegitimate that grates so much. We all know that most of the press is pro-London and anti-Northern, and that most outlets will side with West Ham in these matters. However, there's a difference between the pro-West Ham stuff that most journalists dredge up, and the horrendous bile that Samuels spews forth.

His articles smack of a personal vendetta, more akin to an online blog or forum post than prose worthy of a national newspaper. However, there will be plenty of Hammers fans in London nodding their shaven heads sagely at his words - at least the shorter ones that they can understand - and thinking 'this man's talking sense', sadly.

This will mean more papers sold, and more money for The Mail, so it'll keep the caetacean moron in a job.

However, it doesn't mean that he won't overstep the mark at some point. As time goes on, he's getting more and more emboldened by the fact that his rantings remain unchallenged, and as soon as he goes that one step too far - and opinion turns to libel, I'd imagine our legal team will be on him and the Mail like a pack of hounds on a fox.

A big, fat, pie-stained, cockney, bearded fox.
 
I'd imagine our legal team will be on him and the Mail like a pack of hounds on a fox.

A big, fat, pie-stained, cockney, bearded fox.

I oughta ban you for gross misuse of my name! :D
 
We all know that most of the press is pro-London and anti-Northern, and that most outlets will side with West Ham in these matters.

I must have dreamt the last two years of constant anti-West Ham bias in the media both during and after the whole Tevez furore then.

His articles smack of a personal vendetta

Well, yes, as I alluded to in my post above, the man is a West Ham fan and therefore, undoubtedly, just a smidge biased.

However, there will be plenty of Hammers fans in London nodding their shaven heads sagely at his words - at least the shorter ones that they can understand - and thinking 'this man's talking sense', sadly.

Excellent stereotyping for someone who no doubt works in a steel mill. Well done ;)
 
Excellent stereotyping for someone who no doubt works in a steel mill. Well done ;)

Thanks!

I wasn't stereotyping the entirety of West Ham supporters, just those who would take the fevered rantings of this obese blabbermouth seriously.

And yes, you must have dreamed it. Either that or we're both selectively only listening to the arguments that further our cases ;)

p.s. I am far too feeble to work in a steel mill; I'm a media ponce. My brother used to work in one though!
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom