mattbianco1
Forum Royalty
Also please try and remember that women use this forum too. We have our own tits to stare at thanks. I'm sure some of you do too
Lucky you!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Also please try and remember that women use this forum too. We have our own tits to stare at thanks. I'm sure some of you do too
Sorry Eddie, since the s is belonging to and not a plural, it is 's.It's 1980s actually.
Nothings stopping you posting a nice pair of moobs...
Tell you what: read this (posted again for your benefit): https://www.balls.ie/football/indykaila-investigate-twitters-famous-transfer-bullshitter-171689
Then give your head a wobble and think about what you post before you post it, eh?
Sorry Eddie, since the s is belonging to and not a plural, it is 's.
For it to a plural the reference would need to be in the context of hairy fannies.
Hope this makes sense.
"Nice" & "moobs" are not usually two words I would associate with each other
This is why this account is on the LFC banned list. I can only assume some are reading these carefully-researched tier lists upside down...
There's a wee bit of Tony Agana about him I reckon. The best news from the video by a long way though, is that he'd cost 550k and nobody's interested, so I really don't know what we're mingeing about at.Watching that he scores with left right and head at ease. But can he get stuck out ont wing doing endless triangles, if not I recon that’s what was in the 18 page development plan. We‘ll have not of that scoring malarkey round here young Brewster
That's what mine came out like after I washed it at 50 degrees.
So what's the issue? Posting of the topless pictures or you using work equipment (time?) to log onto to a personal website?DO NOT POST TOPLESS PICTURES IN ANYWHERE BUT THE PIG AND TRUFFLE YOU ABSOLUTE IDIOTIC WAZZOCKS AS SOME OF US ACCESS THIS SITE AT WORK.
ITS NOT A HARD FUCKING RULE TO FOLLOW.
I thought it was a naked woman holding a black haired toddler upside down by the legs..??!?
People who use a work computer do get break times, in which they’re often allowed to use a work computer to access non-work related websites. Pictures of naked women generally fall outside the list of allowed materials though.So what's the issue? Posting of the topless pictures or you using work equipment (time?) to log onto to a personal website?
You don’t do knocked Monday on the first Monday of every month?I thought it was a naked woman holding a black haired toddler upside down by the legs..??!?
Should have gone to Specsavers I suppose...
Appreciate - which is why I asked the question. So to follow that up though, does the site also have to ban foul language just in case someone is accessing from a work computer and may see it over someone's shoulder and may get offended? Where do you draw the line? Does Foxy have to put a warning on the site to say it may contain images and language that some people may find offensive? The issue is if you are using equipment that is not your own but could potentially breach the use of that equipment, where do you draw the line? Where does the responsibility lie? Does Foxy have to change his name to Reverend Jim Jones?People who use a work computer do get break times, in which they’re often allowed to use a work computer to access non-work related websites. Pictures of naked women generally fall outside the list of allowed materials though.
Additionally, not all employers are draconian slave-drivers who insist on presenteeism. In the modern workplace, many people are given the freedom to work as they wish, as long as targets are met.
Tell you what: read this (posted again for your benefit): https://www.balls.ie/football/indykaila-investigate-twitters-famous-transfer-bullshitter-171689
Then give your head a wobble and think about what you post before you post it, eh?
Tell you what: read this (posted again for your benefit): https://www.balls.ie/football/indykaila-investigate-twitters-famous-transfer-bullshitter-171689
Then give your head a wobble and think about what you post before you post it, eh?
Appreciate - which is why I asked the question. So to follow that up though, does the site also have to ban foul language just in case someone is accessing from a work computer and may see it over someone's shoulder and may get offended? Where do you draw the line? Does Foxy have to put a warning on the site to say it may contain images and language that some people may find offensive? The issue is if you are using equipment that is not your own but could potentially breach the use of that equipment, where do you draw the line? Where does the responsibility lie? Does Foxy have to change his name to Reverend Jim Jones?
You keep believing it then, despite all evidence to the contrary.He’s usually spot on leaker plenty of transfers
No factual evidence dis-proving that he isn’t ITK just like Nixon off Twitter
Still doesn’t explain why the account has over 300k followers
Appreciate - which is why I asked the question. So to follow that up though, does the site also have to ban foul language just in case someone is accessing from a work computer and may see it over someone's shoulder and may get offended? Where do you draw the line? Does Foxy have to put a warning on the site to say it may contain images and language that some people may find offensive? The issue is if you are using equipment that is not your own but could potentially breach the use of that equipment, where do you draw the line?
Depends on the employer and the systems they have in place to check web traffic. Some places I’ve worked block access to betting sites; my current employer doesn’t. That said, they’d be rightfully annoyed if I was using my work laptop to look at pictures of naked titties (that’s what my personal equipment* is for).Appreciate - which is why I asked the question. So to follow that up though, does the site also have to ban foul language just in case someone is accessing from a work computer and may see it over someone's shoulder and may get offended? Where do you draw the line? Does Foxy have to put a warning on the site to say it may contain images and language that some people may find offensive? The issue is if you are using equipment that is not your own but could potentially breach the use of that equipment, where do you draw the line? Where does the responsibility lie? Does Foxy have to change his name to Reverend Jim Jones?
Not disagreeing. Just wanted to move things on from 37 reposts of a Sun article, and with it 50 reposts from the BBC/Daily Mail and other outlets quoting the Sun article.Depends on the employer and the systems they have in place to check web traffic. Some places I’ve worked block access to betting sites; my current employer doesn’t. That said, they’d be rightfully annoyed if I was using my work laptop to look at pictures of naked titties (that’s what my personal equipment* is for).
*take that however you will
You keep believing it then, despite all evidence to the contrary.
He’s only ever spot on because he hedges his bets, as discussed in that article.
Credulous idiots who believe anything they read from a Twitter account are the reason he has so many followers. It’s been proven that you can’t see the Great Wall Of China from space but it doesn’t stop people saying it as though it’s fact.
We've met then??Also please try and remember that women use this forum too. We have our own tits to stare at thanks. I'm sure some of you do too
Still doesn’t explain why the account has over 300k followers
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?