Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Brexit - Good idea.Talking of submitting a £25m bid for Rhian Brewster, wouldn't we be better off bidding for European players?
They're better value for money after all. But would they get a work permit now we've left the EU... what's everyone's thoughts on Brexit anyway. Good idea or a bad idea?
Also, £25m?! It's obscene the amount of money being spent on transfers, particularly given we're in the middle of a pandemic. Imagine how many tests could be procured for that money... the lack of available tests really has been a shit show from the Government. What's everyone else's views on Boris' handling of the pandemic?
Well, Nagasaki and Hiroshima rejuvenated so anything's possible......
Just read the Yorkshire Live review. They suggest he’s more interested in the Arsenal lad and we’ve gone cold on Brewster.
I don't get it.
Yes, but that has to be weighed up against the other scenarios. Liverpool’s counter there might for example be “ok then, £45m release – but you’ll have to pay £30m rather than £25m”.
If the alternative to agreeing to the ask is to not get the player in at all, and the only risk to us in agreeing is losing out on some profit, I think we agree to it. In a perfect world there would be no such clause. But if that’s what it takes to get a player otherwise unavailable to us, on a permanent deal, without breaking our other financial criteria, I’m ok with it.
Wilder probably wants both with Mousset's injury, with Balogun being (until bid rejected) a cheap back up/one for future.Just read the Yorkshire Live review. They suggest he’s more interested in the Arsenal lad and we’ve gone cold on Brewster.
It would certainly shut up a few nobheads on here...how they get out of bed in the morning is beyond me!If this lad and balogun come in you’re looking at a situation where we have 5 strikers under the age of 25 with the sixth slot open long term for development prospects. This window could solidify our strike force for the next 5 years allowing funds to be used going forward to identify and recruit quality options in centre mid and centre back. I personally can’t fault United’s mid to long term transfer planning and am very excited.
Wilder probably wants both with Mousset's injury, with Balogun being (until bid rejected) a cheap back up/one for future.
Just read the Yorkshire Live review. They suggest he’s more interested in the Arsenal lad and we’ve gone cold on Brewster.
Must be a generational thing - 60 year old born & bred in Barnsley (living in Slumderland - home of the 'metric martyr' etc etc) I' m purely a pounds shillings pennies bloke - none of this metric ( European) 'shite'
Don't need to if it's done. You focus straight on the next target, if there's nothing more to add.Just read the Yorkshire Live review. They suggest he’s more interested in the Arsenal lad and we’ve gone cold on Brewster.
could be bollocks but the account has 70k followers
could be bollocks but the account has 70k followers
could be bollocks but the account has 70k followers
I hope the Titanic passengers are ok. Tragic.
I get what you are saying and it's up to how much Wilder wants the player, to me I'd tell Liverpool to fuck off unless we're going to make a minimum of £10m profit.
It's no risk to Liverpool, they pocket say £18m before add ons and he's off the wage bill. If he turns into a quality player they get the add ons taking it to £25m and get him back super cheap by paying us back our money with a bargain £5m on top (which a good chuck is covered by not paying his wages for a few seasons).
If he's a flop or gets injured we're out of pocket for the initial fee and 4 years worth of wages. It's just far too one sided to me.
Love your name RicardoI forgot to mention he’s my cousin I could give him a ring. Sort all this out in a phone call.![]()
Will we be going back once Brexit is completed? ponds / shillings / feet / inches / fluid ouncesMust be a generational thing - 60 year old born & bred in Barnsley (living in Slumderland - home of the 'metric martyr' etc etc) I' m purely a pounds shillings pennies bloke - none of this metric ( European) 'shite'
I'm hoping if we're paying £25M, that exact conversation has taken place, as it's at least £5-10M over the odds to my mind.Yes, but that has to be weighed up against the other scenarios. Liverpool’s counter there might for example be “ok then, £45m release – but you’ll have to pay £30m rather than £25m”.
If the alternative to agreeing to the ask is to not get the player in at all, and the only risk to us in agreeing is losing out on some profit, I think we agree to it. In a perfect world there would be no such clause. But if that’s what it takes to get a player otherwise unavailable to us, on a permanent deal, without breaking our other financial criteria, I’m ok with it.
Finally a price bracket we can compete in.I'm hoping if we're paying £25,
The fact is that he’s their player - they are entitled to demand whatever they like for him. It’s up to us to decide if we agree to that. If they want a buy back then we might have to accept that - the fee we pay will be a sunk cost by then, we might not make a huge profit but it’s still money you can respend. You could view it as paying 5 - 7m a year to loan him then selling for 25m...
There’s is also a middle scenario - where he’s good - A top half player - good for 10/15 goals a year but not quite good enough to Tempt them to buy him back. In that case we get a good quality PL striker for a ‘fair’ price.
We went metric when you were 11 years old.Must be a generational thing - 60 year old born & bred in Barnsley (living in Slumderland - home of the 'metric martyr' etc etc) I' m purely a pounds shillings pennies bloke - none of this metric ( European) 'shite'
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?