CONFIRMED Reda Khadra

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


Disappointing that it's only a loan.

Feel like there's a lot for him still to learn and I'd rather the developing period was for our future benefit as opposed to theirs. Really you want loan signings to be better than what you already have and I'm not sure Khadra walks straight into our side.
 

Disappointing that it's only a loan.

Feel like there's a lot for him still to learn and I'd rather the developing period was for our future benefit as opposed to theirs. Really you want loan signings to be better than what you already have and I'm not sure Khadra walks straight into our side.
Great sub to have if he's on the bench thirty times.

He might love it and sign next summer. Who knows. Let's just get him in.
 
do you really think he's coming here on loan to warm the bench?

Why would he not sign for a different team where he would play and why would Brighton allow it?

Has every loan signing we've ever made started every game for us?
He's coming here to compete, but he's going up against arguably our two most talented players.

That's why, to be honest, I'm surprised that it's a straight loan move.
 
Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. Hope this helps. UTB

do you really think he's coming here on loan to warm the bench?

Why would he not sign for a different team where he would play and why would Brighton allow it?
He will only start if he merits it Hecki like Wilder won't tolerate loans where a clause states they must play if fit.
 
If we don't pre agree an option to buy that might screw us because it could be our best chance of signing him if he impresses
 
If we don't pre agree an option to buy that might screw us because it could be our best chance of signing him if he impresses
They’ve been trying to agree one for weeks. I think it’s safe to say if he comes without it then it couldn’t be done by us. Clearly also not by anyone else either.
 
Has every loan signing we've ever made started every game for us?
He's coming here to compete, but he's going up against arguably our two most talented players.

That's why, to be honest, I'm surprised that it's a straight loan move.
It's an odd one, unless we're selling Berge. Although, Berge has been playing in a flat 3 so not competition. He'll be vying just with Ndiaye and I guess Ndiaye will not make many 90 minutes (and will need a rest. He was noticeably poorer when playing too much)

My concern here is that we're arguably expecting him to change his game a bit. Bit of a stretch with a loanee if he's not playing regularly.
He will only start if he merits it Hecki like Wilder won't tolerate loans where a clause states they must play if fit.
There will be no clause but that doesn't change the fact that he'll be coming here expecting to be a significant part in most games.
 
do you really think he's coming here on loan to warm the bench?

Why would he not sign for a different team where he would play and why would Brighton allow it?
Which other team? Clearly there isn’t anyone that interested given the delay and yet no movement from them. I’d say, lots of rumours and talk but no substance.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom