Ramsdale

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


You think? Ramsdale was blind to the shot as so many bodies in the way. Does Henderson have X-ray vision?

even so. We still would of drawn 0-0 at best. Still would of been a poor result in a must win game. But yet so many fans calling for Henderson to save our season. GK is not the issue
No Hendo doesn't have xray vision. What he does have is the ability to be a world class goalie . Rammers doesnt
 
I think that Ramsdale will have faced more shots on goal in his first ten games than Henderson did in twenty.
I’m sure the stats will bear that out and consequently I don’t think it’s a fair comparison. They are both very good keepers or they wouldn’t be where they are. In the meantime, we have to make finding a solution to Jack O'Connells absence our number one priority and provide Ramsdale with some protection.

(I wish he’d wear a long sleeved shirt though, it doesn’t look right, he looks like someone who’s had to go in goal ‘cos he was last to the Rec)
 
What do you want a poll on exactly?

Who is better, Henderson or Ramsdale?

It'd be a fucking landslide.
There you go again with your silly opinions..
You have to compare like with like.. And if you can't see that's an impossibility then you really shouldn't be commenting at all.
 

There you go again with your silly opinions..
You have to compare like with like.. And if you can't see that's an impossibility then you really shouldn't be commenting at all.

Silly opinions?

For suggesting Henderson would have probably saved Gallagher's shot?

For saying Henderson is better Ramsdale?

Get a grip.
 
Silly opinions?

For suggesting Henderson would have probably saved Gallagher's shot?

For saying Henderson is better Ramsdale?

Get a grip.
Are you a bit thick?
Just because you say something and 10 people. give it a like that doesn't validate it.. That's 0.01% of the posters here.
In the same vane my "get to fuck" thread has 98 likes, (I just checked) that's 0.98% of members.
So we should all get to fuck.. With you going first.. Imo.
 
Are you a bit thick?
Just because you say something and 10 people. give it a like that doesn't validate it.. That's 0.01% of the posters here.
In the same vane my "get to fuck" thread has 98 likes, (I just checked) that's 0.98% of members.
So we should all get to fuck.. With you going first.. Imo.

You said that me suggesting Henderson would have saved Gallagher's shot was just my opinion as if it was just me that thinks it.

I pointed out that 10 people liked my post which proves it's not just me.

As for your maths, well, let's not embarrass you any further.
 
You said that me suggesting Henderson would have saved Gallagher's shot was just my opinion as if it was just me that thinks it.

I pointed out that 10 people liked my post which proves it's not just me.
This place has over 10'000 members, and 0.01% agreed.
I think I could make a better case for being a homocidal axe welding maniac and butchering the cast of love Island. Now get to fuck.
 
This place has over 10'000 members, and 0.01% agreed.
I think I could make a better case for being a homocidal axe welding maniac and butchering the cast of love Island. Now get to fuck.
Try again
 

My name against what?

What are you talking about?
Dude. You tried to use 10 likes as validation for an opinion. It's childish in the extreme.. And you expect me to play along..
Go have a rusk or something.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom