robbiez666
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 14,646
- Reaction score
- 19,998
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #181
More than a little concerned that the future of our season depends on whether keepers we've had on our books for longer than a year play in one or two games. Seems just a little stupid. Keepers are keepers. We should already know if they're good enough. While we Russian roulette points away in the spirit of fairness.don’t think anyone seems to have noticed but a deal for a keeper has been agreed and we are just waiting on fodderingham and Verrips to show they aren’t upto being no1
I know it sounds convoluted but I get it, we are going to need them if any thing happens to whoever the No1 is. Bringing in aNo1 without giving either a chance, with Slav fully expecting them to not take that chance.
that’s how I read this anyway
View attachment 119388