Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
GET ALCOCK TO FULL BACK PLEASE,it can't be anymore blatant that he would look even better, and more importantly we would look better with him at RB.
I would move Davies to his PROPER position RM,get Flynny out, no where near fit enough.Alcock and Davies would work quite well i think,don't you?Alcock has been a success at centre back and our best player in both matches.
Davies has created most of our goals and the majority of our chances from right back.
I'm not sure why the blatant solution to our problems is to move and/or drop the pair of them.
How about swapping out 18 year old (only 6 matches) McGahey if you want more experience in at Centre Back.
Try looking at Harris, Flynn, Scougall, Basham and Murphy if you want to take out the underpeforming players.
Alcock has been a success at centre back and our best player in both matches.
Davies has created most of our goals and the majority of our chances from right back.
I'm not sure why the blatant solution to our problems is to move and/or drop the pair of them.
How about swapping out 18 year old (only 6 matches) McGahey if you want more experience in at Centre Back.
Try looking at Harris, Flynn, Scougall, Basham and Murphy if you want to take out the underpeforming players.
I would move Davies to his PROPER position RM,get Flynny out, no where near fit enough.Alcock and Davies would work quite well i think,don't you?
I'm still not sure what the obsession is about moving Alcock away from a position where he's been our one success.
We have problems to solve all over the pitch and about half a dozen underperforming players but everybody seems fixated on the Alcock/Davies non-issue.
You're living in Cloughy land mate.When was the last time we had pace at the back?.Alcock will still be there to cover,he will still be in defence,get this obsession out of your head that we need pace at the back when there has been nothing wrong at the back for a few years now without pace.I think by doing as you suggest you would weaken both the defence and the attack.
First, you create a very worrying lack of pace at centre back (McGahey and Collins).
In the formation we play, Flynn's position is a key attacking role (a wide forward really) and Davies is not suited to it.
Personally, I would play JCR in that role instead of Flynn based on pre-season and the first couple of matches.
I'm still not sure what the obsession is about moving Alcock away from a position where he's been our one success.
Davies has created most of our goals and the majority of our chances from right back.
Because we have no successes at the moment, and as a result, no points.
We have shoe horned Davies into a position he looks incapable of (and as you say) taken Flynn out of the game as a result. You may think Alcock has been a success but his distribution has been poor and we have no-one capable (or willing) to carry the ball forward from the middle (as Collins and Maguire did with great effect last back end).
We know what the players you want to remove can do and giving them the best platform to let them do that is a longer term solution than what is happening at present.
You're living in Cloughy land mate.When was the last time we had pace at the back?.Alcock will still be there to cover,he will still be in defence,get this obsession out of your head that we need pace at the back when there has been nothing wrong at the back for a few years now without pace.
Alcock is a RB who can cover at centre half.Davies is a RM by trade,what do you not understand about their proper positions?Davies is crossing from too deep.He would be alot better crossing further up the pitch.
As for Flynny,its quite clear he's no where near fit to me so he shouldn't be playing and i like Flynny aswell.
You seem on one hand to be suggesting that Alcock can’t bring the ball out from the back and on the other believing that he will be able to bomb forward like Brayford and therefore bring Flynn into the game more.
For one its not a lecture and i'm sorry you see it this way,i'm simply stating what i think we should do.You're lecturing me on playing proper positions and you want to play Davies in the wide Murphy/Flynn role?
Do you not understand that when we only have one striker the player in that position is essentially a wide forward?
You really think Davies is a wide forward or an attack-minded winger?
Also, do you think it's possible to discuss this without adopting a condescending tone and telling me to get my opinions out of my head?
Would love to see a 4-4-2....
Howard
Alcock-HM-Collins-Harris
JCR-Baxter-Murphy-Davies
Higdon-McNulty
Sadly Im expecting.......
Howard
Davies-Alcock-HM-Harris
Flynn-Reed-Scougall-Flynn-Murphy
Higdon
To be fair BOSS, if Ronnie Corbett was in Snow White he'd be the tallest dwarf.
Peterborough (0) 0
Sheff Utd (7) 10 Higdon 5, 12, 36, Murphy 17, 18, Howard 42, Flynn 45, McNutly 78, Porter 88, Clough 90+7 (pen)
Sent off: Captain Blade, 90+8 excessive celebrations
Cheers pal.I don't know why he's playing Davies if Higdon isn't playing.He should have played JCR if he wasn't playing Higdon imo.Howard
Alcock McGahey Collins McEveley
Davies Doyle Basham Murphy
Baxter
McNulty
Cheers pal.I don't know why he's playing Davies if Higdon isn't playing.He should have played JCR if he wasn't playing Higdon imo.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?