Blademan89
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2016
- Messages
- 1,733
- Reaction score
- 3,810
- Thread starter
- #391
Assuming this was regarding my post, so ill nibble.He is the one asset that will fetch some decent money.
Not convinced he is as replaceable as people are thinking.
He rarely gives the ball away
Wins his battles in midfield
Anticipates where an opponent is going so he gets a block or a tackle in
He can move the ball quickly (when there are options)
He remains available for selection
Can last 90+ minutes
Can pick a pass
Has the energy to get the team moving
Has youth on his side and I very high ceiling
Already called up for England youth setups
Has a fantastic attitude
Is a reyt pig WUM
I suspect those people who are talking easy replacement don’t really take into account the inconsistency of youth or the poor quality he has had around him. Added to the constant changes in midfield partners for form, suspension, injuries.
We’ve all witnessed the dreadful first half performances recently when Peck has been on the bench and the improvement of the team when he comes on as a sub.
Easily replaceable?
What?
Matos?
Rothwell?
It won’t be as simple as that.
Do i like him - yes
Do i think hes a decent player - yes
Would i want him to go? - no, if we were in a position to keep him.
I am not as disheartened with peck leaving like I was Ndiaye or berge.
But he's probably our highest asset right now and that money can be used to improve the squad overall.
The money we would get, you can easily bring in a good box to box or upgrade, for example Leicester loaning James with an option for €5m to turn it permanent, whos the same age as peck, Grimes cost Coventry £4m? Swansea paid €2m for Franco......theres players out there that would cost less and easily replace peck.

