Fjortoft's Aeroplane
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2015
- Messages
- 2,005
- Reaction score
- 3,029
I'll admit I thought it was time for Wilder to go last Summer - but I never expected us to bring someone as unproven as Selles in as his replacement.  In context of the start of this season, Wilder's return can only be seen as a positive move (and I'm impressed that COH swallowed their pride here, that can't have been easy).
  
So last season was good in terms of points haul, but awful in terms being dull and drab with atmospheres akin to a funeral even when winning. We'd go 1-0 up and park the bus many, many times and whilst it's better than getting hammered every week... it was far from fun. The concern is we go back to picking up points but it still being dire to watch..however there may be a glimmer of hope in this regard.
With Souza, Anel and Choudhury all gone and serious doubt over our ability in defensive midfield and right back (tbf Burrows has been off it too)... I have to wonder if "One Nil Wilder" will have to change his approach as he returns this season? Could a shakier defense mean he's compelled to go for it and play more attacking football? If he knows we absolutely have to score multiple goals most games to compensate for a shakier defense, surely he'll not persist with Cannon? Am I just clutching at straws here or do we have reason to believe we might get a bit of entertainment this time?
				
			So last season was good in terms of points haul, but awful in terms being dull and drab with atmospheres akin to a funeral even when winning. We'd go 1-0 up and park the bus many, many times and whilst it's better than getting hammered every week... it was far from fun. The concern is we go back to picking up points but it still being dire to watch..however there may be a glimmer of hope in this regard.
With Souza, Anel and Choudhury all gone and serious doubt over our ability in defensive midfield and right back (tbf Burrows has been off it too)... I have to wonder if "One Nil Wilder" will have to change his approach as he returns this season? Could a shakier defense mean he's compelled to go for it and play more attacking football? If he knows we absolutely have to score multiple goals most games to compensate for a shakier defense, surely he'll not persist with Cannon? Am I just clutching at straws here or do we have reason to believe we might get a bit of entertainment this time?
 
	 
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		