JohnDenver
¡No Pasarán!
So Hawkeye is fallible. Fair enough, it was never going to be 100%.
But VAR? NGE.
But VAR? NGE.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
The Guardian report says:
"United players celebrated what they believed to be an obvious goal. But the referee, Michael Oliver, waved play on, dismissing protests by pointing to his watch to indicate it had not buzzed to confirm all of the ball had crossed the line. Moments later the referee blew for an infringement against Villa – and that brought an end to the passage of play, which is why, according to the Premier League, the decision was not allowed to be referred to VAR"
I don't understand why that means the decision was not referred to VAR?
Well exactly. Why not?Admittance that the ball went over the line, so hurry up and award the goal and 3 points then.
The premier League is fucking corrupt end of!!So every goal going forward it will be double checked on VAR, because the refs now know it’s not infallible, but just not for us. If the ref had known this he would have checked it.
Whatever way they cut it, it’s a fucking disgrace but it’ll be forgotten about because it’s not one of the traditional top 6.
If that's true how did they alert the ref it was a goal at HT?
The Guardian report says:
"United players celebrated what they believed to be an obvious goal. But the referee, Michael Oliver, waved play on, dismissing protests by pointing to his watch to indicate it had not buzzed to confirm all of the ball had crossed the line. Moments later the referee blew for an infringement against Villa – and that brought an end to the passage of play, which is why, according to the Premier League, the decision was not allowed to be referred to VAR"
I don't understand why that means the decision was not referred to VAR?
He was the Ref at Middlesboro,when he spotted some part of JOC's anatomy was offside,like a knats bollock,goal cancelled...........i think thats reyt,but mi heads buzzin ATM.Why does this image haunt me.
Remind me?
So your photo clearly shows the ball over the line with no clear obstruction to the camera that took that particular photo .......... but the 7 official Hawkeye cameras couldn’t for the first time in 9,000 matches.All the ball has to cross the line.
Quick pass this to the ref to carry off at the end of the gameView attachment 83201View attachment 83202
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?