But the problem with proving Banana ITK reputation is that they are not provable.
It’s based on what appears in the news papers, which as we know can be publicity stunts to save face.
If we bought NM tomorrow, our papers might say 15 million plus add-ons taking it over 20 million.
BFC would release to their local papers that they sold for 20 million plus add-ons, so how can you prove who is right?
Where as Richard Cadette’s ITK reputation is based on coming up with leftfield random names that have never appeared anywhere in the media
Or the latest media reports will say xxx is signing for SU and he’ll be the first to say it’s not happening.
He also explains why deals broke down and provides info that only someone at negotiator, director, Chris Wilder level could kno
You have a 25% sell on clause? Yeah and I've got a 12 inch cock
To be honest “in the knowers” are pretty much ridiculed on here. We simply don’t believe them because there are so many imposters wanting to be popular.
However regards RC he’s been accurate almost every single time, which is impressive, so has earned the respect.