Neal Maupay

[SteveBlade]

What is the difference in the views of those two?

 

[Banana]

View attachment 57464

Rational. Completely rational.

 

[LJBlade]

Every BFC supporter does? Can YOU work it out

I don’t have to work it out, I’ve asked you the question, it’s apparently easy to answer and yet you can’t answer it. And you’re wondering why nobody is listening to what you’re saying...

 

[Banana]

I don’t have to work it out, I’ve asked you the question, it’s apparently easy to answer and yet you can’t answer it. And you’re wondering why nobody is listening to what you’re saying...

Yes. No-one. No-one at all. Absolutely No-one. No-one. Not one person.

 

[LJBlade]

Yes. No-one. No-one at all

Who on here appears to believe you?

You still haven’t answered that easy question...

 

[JimmyMuir94]

Banana = troll? Surely nobody would be arsed to actually log on to a teams forum to avenge their own club for over a week straight? Shirley... Surely. Its not even that funny, just a straight up cockpisspartridge.

 

[Banana]

Who on here appears to believe you?

You still haven’t answered that easy question...

Oh man.

I told you. I don't care. You do for some reason. It's like you WANT there to be a winner.

 

[Andy67]

Yes. Just "some numpty". I didn't even know that "gullible" was in the dictionary.

Seriously, who on this forum is level-headed and intelligent enough to hold a reasonable discussion with?
You don’t want a discussion surely. RC doesn’t want a discussion he posts information and fucks off, whereas you hang around for a ‘so called’ discussion. My view is give us your info and fuck off.

 

[Yellarbellyblade]

Yes. No-one. No-one at all. Absolutely No-one. No-one. Not one person.

Arguing and listening aren’t necessarily the same thing.

You know what I actually had a soft spot for Brentford. I thought you a pretty decent club for Londoners with a nice old fashioned ground with the added bonus of the four pubs of course.
I’m starting to think you’re like every other London club, so far up your own conceited self important arseholes you’re not worth bothering about.

 

[Pinchy]

Yes. Just "some numpty". I didn't even know that "gullible" was in the dictionary.

Seriously, who on this forum is level-headed and intelligent enough to hold a reasonable discussion with?

What a very curious response to my reply to a different contributor entirely, not you. As for your lack of familiarity with ordinary English words, well that’s something for you to address. I can help, but my fees are demanding and not negotiable.

Apart from those two schoolboy errors, I find you a tiresome, pretentious individual. You have not sought a reasonable discussion but rather to enforce your partisan views in a high-handed and unattractive way. What we have established, beyond doubt, is that you perceive reality as you wish it to be, not as it is and you do not understand how football works.

I told you at the outset of your self-satisfied posturing how this would play out. So it will.

Don’t come to me seeking a battle of wits. You’re unarmed.

 

[LJBlade]

Oh man.

I told you. I don't care. You do for some reason. It's like you WANT there to be a winner.

Easy question....can’t answer....

You clearly don’t care, which is why you’re replying at 12:15am on a Sunday morning

 

[Stretch]

It's long past Banana's bedtime, but he has had far too much sugar tonight.

Settle down everyone, he'll soon crash and slip off into dozieland.

 

[Pinchy]

Ahhh a banker!

A merchant banker, that’s for sure...

 

[Yellarbellyblade]

Yes. Just "some numpty". I didn't even know that "gullible" was in the dictionary.

Seriously, who on this forum is level-headed and intelligent enough to hold a reasonable discussion with?

No one so bugger off.

In case you missed this bit - s24su is

“A forum and fansite by Blades fans, for Blades fans. “

No mention of Bees so buzz off.

 

[Banana]

No one so bugger off.

In case you missed this bit - s24su is

“A forum and fansite by Blades fans, for Blades fans. “

No mention of Bees so buzz off.

Now now. The boardroom at Bramell Lane is one of the best xxx

 

[ItsTheTruth]

from what i've seen of the character of maupay, surely we're the best placed club in this. no other side will give him gametime like we will

 

[Andy67]

Rational. Completely rational.

Neither rational or irrational but a joke. If we were to subject thinks to a scientific rational /irrational your view would come no higher in terms of scientific rationalism as you do not present evidence that is observable and so it cannot be tested and so it would certainly not become a fact. When you can do all of the above I will (along with peers) decide wether it is a) rational b)fact

 

[Banana]

Neither rational or irrational but a joke. If we were to subject thinks to a scientific rational /irrational your view would come no higher in terms of scientific rationalism as you do not present evidence that is observable and so it cannot be tested and so it would certainly not become a fact. When you can do all of the above I will (along with peers) decide wether it is a) rational b)fact

Like others too. QED

let me know what i got wrong so far.

 

[Andy67]

c) or maybe attention seeking

 

[LondonBlade89]

Christ, we’re going to get to 200 pages arguing with a bloke called “Banana” aren’t we?

 

[Andy67]

God exists. Does he, how do you know?. Because I’ve told you. Can you show me anything that proves I am wrong so far. No. Well god exists then believe me.

 

[Andy67]

Christ, we’re going to get to 200 pages arguing with a bloke called “Banana” aren’t we?

I think pitying/piss taking is closer to the mark

 

[LondonBlade89]

Let’s be fair. We have no idea how RC gets his info. We just know from his track record that it’s solid info. That’s all we need to know. Christ knows where it’s from.

And so what’s the point in asking Banana the same question. He’s as likely to tell us his source as RC is. You’d be a shite ITK if you told everyone your source of info.

THAT SAID, Banana, what that does mean is we can’t see your track record and I think you have to accept that we’ll be sceptical. Particularly when you called RC’s post a load of bollocks. That’s like going into Church and telling everyone in there that the Bible is a load of rubbish. Have some respect for us and have some respect for our lord RC.

 

[Roygbiv]

God exists. Does he, how do you know?. Because I’ve told you. Can you show me anything that proves I am wrong so far. No. Well god exists then believe me.

I posted about 690 pages ago this is now akin to the 'Is there a God argument". Our fans think Banana is a ridiculous fanatic with no proof of his claims whilst he and his disciples think we are close minded ignorant fools unwilling to accept that we don't have all the answers.

Cadette is Dawkins, Banana is Desmond Tutu. Or Cliff Richard

 

[Banana]

Let’s be fair. We have no idea how RC gets his info. We just know from his track record that it’s solid info. That’s all we need to know. Christ knows where it’s from.

And so what’s the point in asking Banana the same question. He’s as likely to tell us his source as RC is. You’d be a shite ITK if you told everyone your source of info.

THAT SAID, Banana, what that does mean is we can’t see your track record and I think you have to accept that we’ll be sceptical. Particularly when you called RC’s post a load of bollocks. That’s like going into Church and telling everyone in there that the Bible is a load of rubbish. Have some respect for us and have some respect for our lord RC.

A wise observation. And I do. And I have never said otherwise. I have merely put the BFC side of this story. You lot may not know me, and you may know RC. For others the positions are reversed. You are my favourite Sheffield Side and the best stadium in or around an S postcode. So please don't get your knickers in a twist. But, likewise, it would be useful if those of us from BFC that know what we are talking about were offered a modicum of respect? no?

 

[Banana]

I posted about 690 pages ago this is now akin to the 'Is there a God argument". Our fans think Banana is a ridiculous fanatic with no proof of his claims whilst he and his disciples think we are close minded ignorant fools unwilling to accept that we don't have all the answers.

Cadette is Dawkins, Banana is Desmond Tutu. Or Cliff Richard

Christopher Hitchens if you don;t mind

 

[knowsnowt]

Oh man.

I told you. I don't care.

Yet you sign up to a rivals forum and seek attention by pretending to be itk for almost two weeks now.
Ok.

 

[Banana]

Yet you sign up to a rivals forum and seek attention by pretending to be itk for almost two weeks now.
Ok.

Indeed. My life is now complete.

 

[Andy67]

RC doesn’t preach he passes on information (correct or incorrect) doesn’t debate it because there is nothing to debate you believe in him as a source or disbelieve, he doesn’t stay to argue the toss. Why should anyone stay and argue the toss of information they have been given? Rhetorical question no reply needed

 

[Andy67]

I posted about 690 pages ago this is now akin to the 'Is there a God argument". Our fans think Banana is a ridiculous fanatic with no proof of his claims whilst he and his disciples think we are close minded ignorant fools unwilling to accept that we don't have all the answers.

Cadette is Dawkins, Banana is Desmond Tutu. Or Cliff Richard

Thanks Roy responding to my post is like being acknowledged by the great man in the sky himself.