Netsix_and_chill
Back on the Grass
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2017
- Messages
- 674
- Reaction score
- 2,128
For me the problem is how far down the path of playing 5 at the back we have gone. The only way we can get any width is to use the wing backs as anything else is shoe horning players into positions they aren't suitable for.
If it is to change we need to move a few on and settle on how we want to play, bit confused tonight as to what we were trying to do, was it 433 or 4231 either way we are asking players to do jobs they are not naturally suited to.
Maybe 442 is the answer, Bogle on the right and Osborne on the left (he is just too short to play LB, not his fault and I think he is better in midfield anyway. I also don't think any of the strikers are cut out for being up front on their own so a formation with 2 strikers is a must for me.
If we want to play with wingers then they need to buy some as what we have at the club is just not suitable for it.
That's my opinion anyway.
If it is to change we need to move a few on and settle on how we want to play, bit confused tonight as to what we were trying to do, was it 433 or 4231 either way we are asking players to do jobs they are not naturally suited to.
Maybe 442 is the answer, Bogle on the right and Osborne on the left (he is just too short to play LB, not his fault and I think he is better in midfield anyway. I also don't think any of the strikers are cut out for being up front on their own so a formation with 2 strikers is a must for me.
If we want to play with wingers then they need to buy some as what we have at the club is just not suitable for it.
That's my opinion anyway.