More academy Madness in the PL

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Scooter_mcgavin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
9,751
Reaction score
14,197
Reported in a dodgy red-top today that Man City academy player Jadon Sancho looks set to turn down a new contract and move to Arsenal....

The 17 year old is reported set to turn down a deal worth......

30k a week!

And we really think we can keep hold of Brooks?
 



whats Brookes got left on his contract?

with those sort of wages they can pay low transfer fees and turn the kids heads.
 
As I recall, Man City offered Brooks a slightly smaller deal. That being, they paid nothing and he was asked to leave.

Perhaps in that case, young Brooks won't be easily swayed by a move elsewhere when he's not achieved anything in first team football yet. If he makes a big impact like we all hope, we'll see if the big offers arrive, but United are in a far better position than last year and should be able to hold off bids much easier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dkc
Reported in a dodgy red-top today that Man City academy player Jadon Sancho looks set to turn down a new contract and move to Arsenal....

The 17 year old is reported set to turn down a deal worth......

30k a week!

And we really think we can keep hold of Brooks?


GERRIMPAID, GERREMALLPAID, GERRALIQUIDATORIN.
 
Not really sure why anyone is surprised by this.

The top clubs in every country can buy who they want when they want from any other clubs academy set up. Why do we keep going over old ground? This is the football world we live in. The amount the top end clubs are willing to offer future prospects is obscene but that is how it is.

Its nice that even Man City can lose a player to another club just like we can.

If Brookes is offered huge wages else where then no, we cant keep him .....
 
Jadon Sancho is very, very highly rated and I understand his main reason for leaving City is lack of first team opportunities for academy players.
 
As I recall, Man City offered Brooks a slightly smaller deal. That being, they paid nothing and he was asked to leave.

Perhaps in that case, young Brooks won't be easily swayed by a move elsewhere when he's not achieved anything in first team football yet. If he makes a big impact like we all hope, we'll see if the big offers arrive, but United are in a far better position than last year and should be able to hold off bids much easier.


I understand he was released by city at 16 due to size. So which is it? Anyone??
Either way, paying any 17yr old kid that amount of money having had NO success to justify it is simply crazy. And clubs doing that need to get a grip.
If he had burst into the squad, played some games and proven himself then fair enough. But really?

Brooks has a future in the game, and we need to enjoy him while we can. Sadly, at some point he will leave and there's not a lot we can do about it unless this lad makes the decision it's about football and nothing else. Stay here he possibly plays regularly....leave and he won't. Though he probably won't ever have to work or worry about money again if he never kicked a ball again in his life.
So that's his choice....enjoy his football and become the best he can be....or just chase the cash and lose sight of what he plays football for.
 
Jadon Sancho is very, very highly rated and I understand his main reason for leaving City is lack of first team opportunities for academy players.
John Guidetti was also very, very highly rated.

Not saying he's garbage, far from it, but for what he'll have been paid as an academy player, he hasn't quite hit the heights expected.
 
I understand he was released by city at 16 due to size. So which is it? Anyone??
Either way, paying any 17yr old kid that amount of money having had NO success to justify it is simply crazy. And clubs doing that need to get a grip.
If he had burst into the squad, played some games and proven himself then fair enough. But really?

Brooks has a future in the game, and we need to enjoy him while we can. Sadly, at some point he will leave and there's not a lot we can do about it unless this lad makes the decision it's about football and nothing else. Stay here he possibly plays regularly....leave and he won't. Though he probably won't ever have to work or worry about money again if he never kicked a ball again in his life.
So that's his choice....enjoy his football and become the best he can be....or just chase the cash and lose sight of what he plays football for.

The reason that Solanke left Chelsea was....

They wouldn't pay him his 50k a week wage demand.

Does make you wonder though, is it really the kid demanding it...or the agent.
 
John Guidetti was also very, very highly rated.

Not saying he's garbage, far from it, but for what he'll have been paid as an academy player, he hasn't quite hit the heights expected.
I understand he has, which is why a number of clubs want to sign him. Man City wouldn't be offering him £30k if they didn't think he had a good future ahead of him. They're desperate to keep him.
 
The reason that Solanke left Chelsea was....

They wouldn't pay him his 50k a week wage demand.

Does make you wonder though, is it really the kid demanding it...or the agent.


Probably a bit of both. Agents really are snakes.
I recently read the Zlatan autobiography, and one thing that came from that was the way his agent was able to manipulate clubs with the design on simply earning as much cash as possible.

Sadly, somebody will always pay it by the look of it. And until some regulation is brought in to balance the disparity over where the money goes it just looks like it's not going to stop. And it's killing the smaller clubs, and it's killing talent.
 
I understand he has, which is why a number of clubs want to sign him. Man City wouldn't be offering him £30k if they didn't think he had a good future ahead of him. They're desperate to keep him.

Sorry, I was referring to Guidetti in the whole of that message.
 
Only have to look at Costa now, he wants to go to Athletico but they're under an embargo. I guarantee he will end up in China.

The reason - Jorge Mendes is his agent.

This absolute cretin must be worth in the high hundreds of millions and for what? Being a glorified PA.
 
Not really sure why anyone is surprised by this.

The top clubs in every country can buy who they want when they want from any other clubs academy set up. Why do we keep going over old ground? This is the football world we live in. The amount the top end clubs are willing to offer future prospects is obscene but that is how it is.

Its nice that even Man City can lose a player to another club just like we can.

If Brookes is offered huge wages else where then no, we cant keep him .....
Good post, I'm fairly sure that will satisfy the McCabe haters and no one will complain when it happens.

UTB
 
Once again I urge everybody to listen to
'Fans Forum Q&A part two' on the 'SheffieldUTube' channel on Youtube when wanting to talk transfers, if you can't be bothered listening to all of it start at 6:45 Travis Binnion is talking.
I've listened to all 4 parts of the Q&A - IT IS WELL WORTH A LISTEN!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dkc



Sorry, I was referring to Guidetti in the whole of that message.
Sorry, misunderstood. I think we're on the same page though when I say, at that age, there's a huge amount of guesswork going on. Educated guessing in most cases but guessing all the same.
 
Jadon Sancho is very, very highly rated and I understand his main reason for leaving City is lack of first team opportunities for academy players.


Yes, if he's good enough at Arsenal he will get his chance
That's the best thing about Wenger

Man City can then buy him back for £70 million later, and Arsenal will do the same thing over again
 
Sorry, misunderstood. I think we're on the same page though when I say, at that age, there's a huge amount of guesswork going on. Educated guessing in most cases but guessing all the same.

Oh of course, players are always developing.

It would be interesting to have some stats of how many players go on to have stellar careers when presented with riches from a young age.

It's all relative though, I'd argue the likes of Nick Powell, Patrick Roberts have kinda fallen away since getting big money moves, but the money they will have made will be most than most people do in a lifetime.
 
I understand he was released by city at 16 due to size. So which is it? Anyone??
Either way, paying any 17yr old kid that amount of money having had NO success to justify it is simply crazy. And clubs doing that need to get a grip.
If he had burst into the squad, played some games and proven himself then fair enough. But really?

Brooks has a future in the game, and we need to enjoy him while we can. Sadly, at some point he will leave and there's not a lot we can do about it unless this lad makes the decision it's about football and nothing else. Stay here he possibly plays regularly....leave and he won't. Though he probably won't ever have to work or worry about money again if he never kicked a ball again in his life.
So that's his choice....enjoy his football and become the best he can be....or just chase the cash and lose sight of what he plays football for.
I

If your son was on a three year contract at £500 a week and was on the first team bench for his current club and was offered £5k a week for three years at a Premier League outfits U23s, what would you tell him to do? Do you stick or gamble. Infact what is more of a gamble? Moving on a high wage to try and get in a premier league first team or gamble that your current manger has the conviction to play you at your current club?

The football industry understands how young kids are today, they know money talks and they know it would take a very very strong minded young kid to pass up a chance to earn thousands of pounds a week on the off chance he might get a regular start with his present team......
 
I

If your son was on a three year contract at £500 a week and was on the first team bench for his current club and was offered £5k a week for three years at a Premier League outfits U23s, what would you tell him to do? Do you stick or gamble. Infact what is more of a gamble? Moving on a high wage to try and get in a premier league first team or gamble that your current manger has the conviction to play you at your current club?

The football industry understands how young kids are today, they know money talks and they know it would take a very very strong minded young kid to pass up a chance to earn thousands of pounds a week on the off chance he might get a regular start with his present team......


I would tell him to do what makes him happy.
But if he's playing every week in the u/23's yes he will get game time, but it's still not comparable to playing against men, and having the fact of it actually meaning something.

It's a gamble....and I hope it happens to my lad so that he has that choice. If it came along, I think my son would take the money and prestige of the premier league side. It's going to be a very confident individual that believes in himself enough to think he will be good enough to get game time and earn his big pay day the hard way.

5k a week over three years is £750k! He'd come out with £300k in his hand....however unless he starts knocking on the door of the premier league side by the end of the three years he may find himself dropping down the leagues and gone. Whereas if he gets experience and games at first team level he may stand a better chance of making a full career out of the game. And even down in league one mid table sides, these fellas are earning £200k a year.
You get my drift....who knows what's the right thing to do, nobody has a crystal ball after all. But I would never criticise any lad for taking the cash....you're a long time out of football and the rewards are huge and can set you up for life.
 
I would tell him to do what makes him happy.
But if he's playing every week in the u/23's yes he will get game time, but it's still not comparable to playing against men, and having the fact of it actually meaning something.

It's a gamble....and I hope it happens to my lad so that he has that choice. If it came along, I think my son would take the money and prestige of the premier league side. It's going to be a very confident individual that believes in himself enough to think he will be good enough to get game time and earn his big pay day the hard way.

5k a week over three years is £750k! He'd come out with £300k in his hand....however unless he starts knocking on the door of the premier league side by the end of the three years he may find himself dropping down the leagues and gone. Whereas if he gets experience and games at first team level he may stand a better chance of making a full career out of the game. And even down in league one mid table sides, these fellas are earning £200k a year.
You get my drift....who knows what's the right thing to do, nobody has a crystal ball after all. But I would never criticise any lad for taking the cash....you're a long time out of football and the rewards are huge and can set you up for life.
£750k gross but only £300k net? Can I recommend a good accountant? Failing that, there's Sean Thornton ;)
 
I

If your son was on a three year contract at £500 a week and was on the first team bench for his current club and was offered £5k a week for three years at a Premier League outfits U23s, what would you tell him to do? Do you stick or gamble. Infact what is more of a gamble? Moving on a high wage to try and get in a premier league first team or gamble that your current manger has the conviction to play you at your current club?

The football industry understands how young kids are today, they know money talks and they know it would take a very very strong minded young kid to pass up a chance to earn thousands of pounds a week on the off chance he might get a regular start with his present team......


Sadly the lad will be aware of a great number of young pros of his age who ultimately failed as far as the big time goes. Anyone would have to think seriously about setting themselves up for life with a three year £30k a week contract when no one knows what's around the corner.
 
£750k gross but only £300k net? Can I recommend a good accountant? Failing that, there's Sean Thornton ;)
You see what i mean though Bush. To a young lad it is serious money.

For what its worth i think Maguire's career has been perfect. Plenty of games in L1, Championship games, Premiership games then life changing move.
If only it was that straight forward for the rest.
 
I would tell him to do what makes him happy.
But if he's playing every week in the u/23's yes he will get game time, but it's still not comparable to playing against men, and having the fact of it actually meaning something.

It's a gamble....and I hope it happens to my lad so that he has that choice. If it came along, I think my son would take the money and prestige of the premier league side. It's going to be a very confident individual that believes in himself enough to think he will be good enough to get game time and earn his big pay day the hard way.

5k a week over three years is £750k! He'd come out with £300k in his hand....however unless he starts knocking on the door of the premier league side by the end of the three years he may find himself dropping down the leagues and gone. Whereas if he gets experience and games at first team level he may stand a better chance of making a full career out of the game. And even down in league one mid table sides, these fellas are earning £200k a year.
You get my drift....who knows what's the right thing to do, nobody has a crystal ball after all. But I would never criticise any lad for taking the cash....you're a long time out of football and the rewards are huge and can set you up for life.
I would not have a go for a young lad moving for a big salary, but i would moan if the club have not tied him down to a contract that would enable the club to get top dollar for him if he moved on.
 
You see what i mean though Bush. To a young lad it is serious money.

For what its worth i think Maguire's career has been perfect. Plenty of games in L1, Championship games, Premiership games then life changing move.
If only it was that straight forward for the rest.
Isn't this why Brooks has been given loads of game time in the friendlies? It appears to me that CW is saying 'look, keep working hard and you'll play this season, stay here and learn with us'. That's as much as we can do really. And if Brooks does work hard, he'll have a similar trajectory to H, play for us until he's considered good at championship level, then go for big money to a club that intends to bring him through, not stick him in the u23s and forget about him.

A good season or so with us would get him a move to somewhere like Tottenham as a squad player pushing for first team. Then on to Real ....
 
Reported in a dodgy red-top today that Man City academy player Jadon Sancho looks set to turn down a new contract and move to Arsenal....

The 17 year old is reported set to turn down a deal worth......

30k a week!

And we really think we can keep hold of Brooks?


I would also imagine that he sees his chances limited at Man City.

Which positiion does he play in? Who is in his way?

Maybe Arsenal are saying he will be guarenteed more first team football there?

It may not just come down to money.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom