Monty loyalty

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Let the useless twat leave, in fact kick him out the door. We as a club will never progress while we have players of this calibre in the squad.

Its twats like you, that have no real insight into the game of football, every team need a monty, every team also need a play maker, monty is not a play maker, but without him to win and break up play the team is poorer
 

And of course brain dead twats like you are always welcome at the Lane because they know you'll put up with any old crock of shit.
 
Mart, the Newcastle game showed his strengths to a tee, the super late foul in a dangerous position just outside our area, no one does it better & so many times too. The super through ball to the safe hands of Harper in the Newcastle goal to break up our attack, no one does it better or so often, the scuffed passes & 'whack-it's to no one in particular, no one does it better etc. (you get the gist) but hey he got a couple of tackles in & found his man once, that`s impressive. Don`t forget he got a goal this season too.

Player of the season for me, despite being a liability before his injury, being a liability for the half dozen games after his comeback & then being his normal self ever since, good, crap, awful, laughable & occasionally ok..... all in a matter of a minute
 
And the fact that we've invested thousands of man hours in this chimp yet he still can't control a football means what? Does it mean that we can't get rid because we want a return? That we feel obliged to offer him a contract just because he's stayed "loyay" purely down to the fact that no one else is stupid enough to sign him?

Let the useless twat leave, in fact kick him out the door. We as a club will never progress while we have players of this calibre in the squad.

How long have you been watching the Blades a long time? then you know you should not take your frustration out on 1 player coz over all these years not much changes in the way of progress. We are, have been and will be where we are for a long time yet in terms of the mentallity of the club.
 
Another great game yesterday. Made our defence look solid and at last supported well by a running Harper. If only Monty's loyalty would rub off on others.
 
Another great game yesterday. Made our defence look solid and at last supported well by a running Harper. If only Monty's loyalty would rub off on others.

Oh if only :rolleyes: Then we could have a team of talentless, clueless runners but hey, at least they'd be loyal :eek:;):eek:

:gallop:
 
if i walked into my house and caught monty in bed with my missus, i swear i would tuck em in!!
 

Players leaving BDTBL for more money / better prospects

James Beatie - Not Playing
Michael Tonge - out on Loan elsewhere ( Derby )
Mathew Kilganon - Not Playing
Kyle Naughton - Out on Loan & bench warming
Kyle Walker - Not Playing

Flip Side

Phil Jagielka - Playing & Doing well
Mikchael Brown - Playing

Mont had better be confident about moving , otherwise , get a good soft pillow.

Oh and a good pair of tweezers for the spells
 
You are still going on about this???! :rolleyes:

and even after all this time (and a hundred explantions) you still don't get it!!!??? You really are a cad Boo Radley :D:D:D

#
05-05-2010 03:37 PM #61
Ollessendro



Quote Originally Posted by Coily View Post
http://en.tackfilm.se/?id=1272979875961RA32
LMAO.

Well Monty knockers, that'll silence you!? sign him up.

For a man boared of a subject and not answering peoples questions of you, you appear to be playing devils advocate again and despite being bored cannot wait till someone brings the Monty subject up again.
Well hey here it is with unanswered questions from last time.
the video is great by the way and with your obsession it does not suprise me that you have this.
feel free to answer the unanswered in your thread.
for those not wishing to review -SORRY ABOUT THE BUMP.
 
For a man boared of a subject and not answering peoples questions of you, you appear to be playing devils advocate again and despite being bored cannot wait till someone brings the Monty subject up again.
Well hey here it is with unanswered questions from last time.
the video is great by the way and with your obsession it does not suprise me that you have this.
feel free to answer the unanswered in your thread.
for those not wishing to review -SORRY ABOUT THE BUMP.

Oh here we go again!? I did not bring the Monty subject up, I merley replied to a thread. I DID NOT PUT THE VIDEO UP you clown. If you look properly (something you seem to do time and time again) then you'll see that Coily posted the video.

So you want me to answer the unanswered questions. Ok .....

We should not take your replies seriously then because all this thread was a joke and you strung everyone along?
Your replies were not some thing you personally believed, is that what you are saying?

Yes. This thread was all tongue in cheek and I did it to prove a point. (For the 100th time) I started this thread to show the weakness of Boo Radley's argument about Kilgallon's lack of commitment to United. I made several tongue in cheek comments saying that Monty was not commited to United in order to show that Boo's argument was a flawed one. My comments were meant to be taken with a pinch of salt, although I expected many people to take them deadly seriously. I was prepared for this and hence tried to explain several times.

Yes. of course i didn't really think that Mongommery was playing worse because his contract was up in the summer. It would have been silly (at least back then) to question montgommery's commitment to the club because his contract was up. However Boo applied the same logic to the Kilgallon situation. He said Killa was playing worse (pulling out of tackles etc) because he wasn't commited to United (i.e. wouldn't sign a new contract) which was just nonsense. By the same logic i argued that Monty was playing poorly because he was not commited to United (i.e his contract being up in the summer). So the short answer to your question is yes; I did not believe that Monty was not loyal to United.

Don't ask for my forgiveness if you don't really want it.

Question the loyalty of someone all you like, far be it from me to stand in your way. Where's the evidence that he "wants" to leave?

I think I answered this already. He still hasn't sgned a new contract. Nor has he made any statement that he wants to stay at the club. As it stands he looks set to leave United. I think it is fair to say that if he really wanted to stay at united he would have singed a contract by now. If not, he could have come out and sets fans at ease. He could say he was commited to the Blades and they are trying to work something out.

Great, yes you got it. It was aimed at you and the reason it is posted with the intellect of a 14year old is because.
You quote a newspaper report as evidence that he wants to leave.
Now you make this ASSUMPTION because he turned down a new contract. That does not mean he wants to leave. It says nothing about him wanting to leave in that newspaper report.
So to sum up Tony Agana is right to question where your evidence is.
Is that plain enough? And I do apologise if it is condescending.

Yes that is plain enough.

So is there anything more you'd like to ask of me? Any more pointless questions you want to ask me? Save the 14 year school girl comments as I'm not interested.
 
Oh here we go again!? I did not bring the Monty subject up, I merley replied to a thread. I DID NOT PUT THE VIDEO UP you clown. If you look properly (something you seem to do time and time again) then you'll see that Coily posted the video.

So you want me to answer the unanswered questions. Ok .....



Yes. This thread was all tongue in cheek and I did it to prove a point. (For the 100th time) I started this thread to show the weakness of Boo Radley's argument about Kilgallon's lack of commitment to United. I made several tongue in cheek comments saying that Monty was not commited to United in order to show that Boo's argument was a flawed one. My comments were meant to be taken with a pinch of salt, although I expected many people to take them deadly seriously. I was prepared for this and hence tried to explain several times.

Yes. of course i didn't really think that Mongommery was playing worse because his contract was up in the summer. It would have been silly (at least back then) to question montgommery's commitment to the club because his contract was up. However Boo applied the same logic to the Kilgallon situation. He said Killa was playing worse (pulling out of tackles etc) because he wasn't commited to United (i.e. wouldn't sign a new contract) which was just nonsense. By the same logic i argued that Monty was playing poorly because he was not commited to United (i.e his contract being up in the summer). So the short answer to your question is yes; I did not believe that Monty was not loyal to United.



I think I answered this already. He still hasn't sgned a new contract. Nor has he made any statement that he wants to stay at the club. As it stands he looks set to leave United. I think it is fair to say that if he really wanted to stay at united he would have singed a contract by now. If not, he could have come out and sets fans at ease. He could say he was commited to the Blades and they are trying to work something out.



Yes that is plain enough.

So is there anything more you'd like to ask of me? Any more pointless questions you want to ask me? Save the 14 year school girl comments as I'm not interested.

Who even said you put the video up? so look closely at your own comments before you start calling people clowns because its just reflected back to you. Its not my fault you keep shooting yourself in the foot. I can at least make a distinction between 'evidence' and 'hearsay'.
So besides the replies where you decide to keep calling people names:
1. Are we to take any of your replies to posters in this thread seriously?
 
Can we put a flag on this thread so we know when something of value has been added to the discussion? I keep looking at it when it hits the top but it's still a pissing content.
 
Who even said you put the video up? so look closely at your own comments before you start calling people clowns because its just reflected back to you. Its not my fault you keep shooting yourself in the foot. I can at least make a distinction between 'evidence' and 'hearsay'.
So besides the replies where you decide to keep calling people names:
1. Are we to take any of your replies to posters in this thread seriously?

see below (in bold).

#
05-05-2010 03:37 PM #61
Ollessendro



Quote Originally Posted by Coily View Post
http://en.tackfilm.se/?id=1272979875961RA32
LMAO.

Well Monty knockers, that'll silence you!? sign him up.

For a man boared of a subject and not answering peoples questions of you, you appear to be playing devils advocate again and despite being bored cannot wait till someone brings the Monty subject up again.
Well hey here it is with unanswered questions from last time.
the video is great by the way and with your obsession it does not suprise me that you have this.
feel free to answer the unanswered in your thread.
for those not wishing to review -SORRY ABOUT THE BUMP.

What on earth is that supposed to mean then? This is not implying that I put the video up? if not then forgive me for getting muddled up in your perfect English. I don't use the term clown lightly, but you my friend fully warrant it.

I've answered your question several times. Read my last post dim wit.
 
see below (in bold).



What on earth is that supposed to mean then? This is not implying that I put the video up? if not then forgive me for getting muddled up in your perfect English. I don't use the term clown lightly, but you my friend fully warrant it.

I've answered your question several times. Read my last post dim wit.

So thats why you keep typing words wrong because you get all het up? I will also assume that this is the reason you decided to revert to personal abuse. Pull back tha colla kid and let the steam out.
I was no more IMPLYING you put the video up than you were implying that you had evidence instead of hearsay, so forgive me for getting muddled up in your perfect English definisions.:p
 
So thats why you keep typing words wrong because you get all het up? I will also assume that this is the reason you decided to revert to personal abuse. Pull back tha colla kid and let the steam out.
I was no more IMPLYING you put the video up than you were implying that you had evidence instead of hearsay, so forgive me for getting muddled up in your perfect English definisions.:p

I'm not het up. I can remain erfectly calm and still think you are not the most intelligent person that I've ever met.

I apologise for personal abuse though. It's unncecessary. No matter what i think of your intelligence levels I shouldn't be personal and insultive. Sorry.
 
Trevor Birch says: "We have put an improved offer to Nick Montgomery and are waiting on his response,

Just a greedy footballer get him fucked off then, the guy is replaceable that is for sure.
 
I'm not het up. I can remain erfectly calm and still think you are not the most intelligent person that I've ever met.

I apologise for personal abuse though. It's unncecessary. No matter what i think of your intelligence levels I shouldn't be personal and insultive. Sorry.

Yes you see that just goes to show 'intelligence' When exactly did we meet? I wonder if a tribesman in Africa would be intelligent? i bet in his surroundings he would totally out do you but as for trying to work out your double bluffs as you wish to have it all ways in this thread YOU started well he may struggle to decide when your answers were serious or just fun.
Mind you at least i can smell wite:D
 
Trevor Birch says: "We have put an improved offer to Nick Montgomery and are waiting on his response,

Just a greedy footballer get him fucked off then, the guy is replaceable that is for sure.

If you did the same jobs as 10 other people where you worked but you earned less money than them, would you hold out to be paid just as much? Seeing as your customers has just voted you the best employee?

You don't know how much he was offered and how much of an increase he has been offered so you can't really call him greedy.

10 years at Bramall Lane. That's not replaceable.
 
If you did the same jobs as 10 other people where you worked but you earned less money than them, would you hold out to be paid just as much? Seeing as your customers has just voted you the best employee?

You don't know how much he was offered and how much of an increase he has been offered so you can't really call him greedy.

10 years at Bramall Lane. That's not replaceable.

He can be replaced and also the club stance at the moment is they are not going to pay anyone over the odds. He has been here for a long time and he certainly wont be being paid peanuts at the moment.

We have made an improved offer he can take it or leave it.
 

He can be replaced and also the club stance at the moment is they are not going to pay anyone over the odds. He has been here for a long time and he certainly wont be being paid peanuts at the moment.

We have made an improved offer he can take it or leave it.

rubbish anyway, monty can go for me.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom