Ollessendro
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
- Messages
- 5,024
- Reaction score
- 988
I can't agree with this bit entirely Olle, I would imagine Kitson is on the most money out of that lot but he certainly is not a Wilson signing considering he stated we should not be bringing in any more over 30 yr old strikers a few days before Kitson signed. That signing to me has McCabe written all over it due to him being a family friend of the McCabe's. I'm amazed that when Quinn was around we could afford to loan Gallagher but now both have gone we cannot afford to bring in anyone, something don't sound right here.
Wilson chose to sign Cofie, Miller and Blackman before McCabe signed Kitson. He also chose to re-sign Porter. Wilson might not have had a hand in signing our best striker, but he sowed his seeds by signing the others. Whether the number was 6 or 7 it did not matter, 2 were only ever going to start. Having anything over 4 strikers on the books is just daft. Everyone could see this, but Wilson did nothing about it. It was obvious Quinn was off, yet nothing was sorted. I thought the reason for sending Gallagher back was that we needed to spen his wages on getting cover for Long. However we have not done that. Presumably Howard is back soon. Perhaps we are too close to the FFPR cut off point, but we desperately need a winger and I really hope that we can sort something.