ourbob
Member
...before the match last night that if we get 90k fans in the lane over the next 4 matches it will better the filthy porkers in their last promotion season.
....just sayin like.
....just sayin like.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
...before the match last night that if we get 90k fans in the lane over the next 4 matches it will better the filthy porkers in their last promotion season.
....just sayin like.
I'd imagine Chesterfield will be a near/complete sell out so that would leave us 60k give or take a few over 3 games. I can't see us getting less than 20k in the other fixtures despite one being on sky.
I'd imagine Chesterfield will be a near/complete sell out so that would leave us 60k give or take a few over 3 games. I can't see us getting less than 20k in the other fixtures despite one being on sky.
You could be right buddy. However I honestly thought last nights attendance would've been bigger than it wasIt could be on BBC and I think it would still be a near full house on Easter Monday Vs Bradford.
I thought it was a decent turn out considering it is close to end of the month, fans shelling out to go to the away game at Oldham as well as shelling out to buy next years season tickets.You could be right buddy. However I honestly thought last nights attendance would've been bigger than it was
...before the match last night that if we get 90k fans in the lane over the next 4 matches it will better the filthy porkers in their last promotion season.
This bbc stuff,tell me more?
The BBC have no TV rights for League 1. It's nonsense.
Four matches? Are you including the play-off second leg?![]()
90,000? I thought the truffle-snufflers got that attendance every home game.
Just goes to show there's hardly anything between both clubs support. There's was boosted by the 38000 for the Wycombe game as well, which had every pig bringing along their wives, girlfriends, grandma and grandad, who wouldn't and probably haven't set foot in the Swill since. They've always benefitted from a larger capacity which allows one or two one off games each season such as the Wycombe game to artificially inflate their average attendance.
Our support this season has been incredibly consistent, no wild swings to make the figures look better.
Somehow United have managed to grow the fan base despite years of failure and kicks in the teeth. Much as the pigs would like to believe it, it's not down to fans getting in on kids tickets. If some do it's only going to be at the same level as they do at the Swill (assuming they too have automated turnstiles)
Would like to see a small increase in our capacity, perhaps to about 37000, a moderately successful United in the top league would need that, as we've already proved, unlike across the city where it's all assumptions because they believe themselves to be a bigger club than us.
Ah. I see. It could indeed have meant that.I think what Harry's Game was saying is that the game could be on BBC (ie an even wider audience to that of Sky) and we'd still sell out and TV will have no bearing on the attendance as it can usually do.
So they would have you believe. The last time we averaged 30k+ in a season (2006-07) players like Jags were playing (and still are). The last time the pigs averaged 30k+ (1968), the Blades again averaged 30k+ three years later (1971), Bobby Charlton still had 4 years of his career to come and the World Cup in Mexico was 2 years away.
You will find more fleas on a camel than you will on a dog. It's all relative. Or something like that anyway.It's a daft argument to get into because you're always going to end up with egg on your face when then they tell you that Wednesday have averaged 30,000 more times than us.
Which they have.
cant match wednesday who only get 30k when they charge a tennerWe do have very cheap tickets as well at £18.
It's a daft argument to get into because you're always going to end up with egg on your face when then they tell you that Wednesday have averaged 30,000 more times than us.
Which they have.
Since 1968 ?It's a daft argument to get into because you're always going to end up with egg on your face when then they tell you that Wednesday have averaged 30,000 more times than us.
Which they have.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?