Player Suggestion Luke Woolfenden

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Just so I don’t have to read any more of this shite: Collins, the point Scooter is making is that he didn’t say the next signing would be a paid signing.
FWIW I don’t understand what pleasure charlatans get from pretending they know stuff, but then again I have a life outside of the forum so that might explain things

What is this "life outside of the forum" you speak of?
 

Collins Morris If you don't actually give out any concrete info except for cryptic clues, are you even ITK? I haven't got an issue with your snippets tbh but sure Richard Cadette just came out with the info (which was usually correct) then disappeared until the next lot came along.

I'd rather wait until our socials posted it, getting a leak before just ruins the surprise/anger. Equivalent of wanting to know the Star Wars spoilers before you see the film 😂
 
Who’s worse the supposed ITKer? Or those that hound them constantly?

giphy.gif
 
If incomings depend on outgoings etc then I doubt we sign anyone aside from some lower leagues prospects as we aren’t likely to make that much surely ??

the loan option was always going to be most likely scenario giving the outlay was always going to be wages on that
 
If incomings depend on outgoings etc then I doubt we sign anyone aside from some lower leagues prospects as we aren’t likely to make that much surely ??

the loan option was always going to be most likely scenario giving the outlay was always going to be wages on that

Is suspect it has more to do with the number of players in the squad than money. Maybe a little to do with wages.
 
Is suspect it has more to do with the number of players in the squad than money. Maybe a little to do with wages.

that makes sense if the reported figure of 20 or more is right

if it’s 10 then my guess would be that’s one player who you would think would be part of match day squad etc
 
Looks like Collins maybe ITK after all.

So I will now not be looking at this thread again until someone leaves.
 

Hilarious isn't it. He can't claim a win though as he offered nothing himself. If he'd at least acknowledged I'd got the first XI correct I'd tip my hat to him.
Just saying Mcgoldrick wasn't in the squad would probably have been enough to prove ITK status, on lineups anyway.
 
Just saying Mcgoldrick wasn't in the squad would probably have been enough to prove ITK status, on lineups anyway.

Exactly. But instead he said nothing.

I guessed that lineup after seeing Mousset & McBurnie go well together against West Ham. I also think Lundstram is due a rest, but it's risky dropping him & McGoldrick simultaneously as they both help us get up the pitch. I think we'd end up with those horrible gaps between midfield & strikers if we'd made both those changes today.

Besic would win us the ball but he'd be punting it up field into channels without McGoldrick on the pitch linking the play. As it is, I think we've picked the right side. The boys at the top can score goals from scraps.

Once we're mathematically safe, I see Wilder giving our old system another go in a home game. McGoldrick or Freeman in the hole behind today's front pairing.
 
Never really got the hounding of the ITK-ers. If their info is shit they soon get rumbled. If it’s genuine like Richard Cadette then you get your gold star.

This 100%

I find those that hound the (real or fake) ITKers just as bad as the bullshitters, we're all capable of working out for ourselves if someone is genuine or not.

The pointless back and forth trying to out a potential fake ITKer on this thread was boring beyond belief.
 
If folk don't like what ITK's put forward why get so aggressive, time will tell, the funny thing is everyone reads what ITK's have to say, as CM says judge what he says at the end of the window, me? I'm enjoying being in the pub chatting soccer with some blades, and arsenal and, oh yeah, some Wendy, chill out, it's cool 😎
 
Exactly. But instead he said nothing.

I guessed that lineup after seeing Mousset & McBurnie go well together against West Ham. I also think Lundstram is due a rest, but it's risky dropping him & McGoldrick simultaneously as they both help us get up the pitch. I think we'd end up with those horrible gaps between midfield & strikers if we'd made both those changes today.

Besic would win us the ball but he'd be punting it up field into channels without McGoldrick on the pitch linking the play. As it is, I think we've picked the right side. The boys at the top can score goals from scraps.

Once we're mathematically safe, I see Wilder giving our old system another go in a home game. McGoldrick or Freeman in the hole behind today's front pairing.
Just to add to this. When Egan missed a game I was PM’d by a good poster who’d had reliable information that Egan was definitely out. The pig who claims to be ITK said nothing about this, when he posted his team he said Egan/Jagielka. If he was even close to being ITK he’d have known Egan was out.
 
Just to add to this. When Egan missed a game I was PM’d by a good poster who’d had reliable information that Egan was definitely out. The pig who claims to be ITK said nothing about this, when he posted his team he said Egan/Jagielka. If he was even close to being ITK he’d have known Egan was out.

I was pretty certain it was Duffy's old man. He definitely did use to know the starting lineups back when he was here, proudly announcing them before games.

I hope he's gone now, he was starting to completely ruin this forum.
 
I was pretty certain it was Duffy's old man. He definitely did use to know the starting lineups back when he was here, proudly announcing them before games.

I hope he's gone now, he was starting to completely ruin this forum.
Collins Morris? I thought that was some other twat.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom