Wards
Well-Known Member
Don't you dare slander Little BenThat's a fucking low bar to clear

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Don't you dare slander Little BenThat's a fucking low bar to clear
they could still sell him to us but put it in the deal that he doesnt play at the city ground against us but still think 7m with add ons is the most we should be offering em for himI reckon Forest will wait until after we've played them to sell unless we are willing to overpay. If we move on they can always find him a loan elsewhere.
3rd party influence. Not allowed unless Trevor brooking is looking after your best interests innit?they could still sell him to us but put it in the deal that he doesnt play at the city ground against us but still think 7m with add ons is the most we should be offering em for him
A few on here keep saying that it has and that they need to sell players to balance the finances.The fees and wages that Forest have spent over the last 12 months or so must have them close to the FFP limits. They have a huge squad and will be looking to offload. I think this will be a end of window signing after we played forest and the 25 man squads have been announced
Up to £105m losses in 3 years but does this cross leagues? I can't find a definitive statement on this so I suspect no. This means Forest have this season and the next to get/keep their overall spending below that figure. Last season they looked to have a transfer deficit in excess of £150m, add wages, take off income - it should all come out in the accounts.A few on here keep saying that it has and that they need to sell players to balance the finances.
Don’t forget they’re also being investigated for non payments to players and agentsUp to £105m losses in 3 years but does this cross leagues? I can't find a definitive statement on this so I suspect no. This means Forest have this season and the next to get/keep their overall spending below that figure. Last season they looked to have a transfer deficit in excess of £150m, add wages, take off income - it should all come out in the accounts.
skipp is a very good midfielder but think wages could be a stumbling blockI think if you don’t go for a naturally left sided player like obrien you need to go for hamer who is a baller type, you could probably stick anywhere across the midfield.
Another midfielder I would like to chuck in the mix for a loan is Oliver Skipp who they think will be made available for loan from spurs. Not sure he fits the left side in front of Souza but you could probably move slimane across.
We need bothI'd rather have Hamer than O'Brien tbh
I'd rather have Hamer than O'Brien tbh
i agree yes weve signed souza but we definetly need a minimum of 2 more midfielders to come in before the end of the window obrien is obviously heckys choice for flecks position on the left and hamer to replace bergeWe need both
yeah i think we hold the cards with obrien forest are in financial trouble and once they realise theres no way their getting 10m for obrien i think they will weaken 7m would get him imo maybe with some add ons but that is definetly the maximum price we should be paying for himWe definitely need 2.
Has a feel that If we get hamer that wouldn’t happen where as Smallwood and obrien feels more achievable
It's the daily fail mate , 1 disputed bonus for them turns over expanecially to give them headlines!!!!!!!!Don’t forget they’re also being investigated for non payments to players and agents
![]()
Nottingham Forest owe MILLIONS to players and agents
EXCLUSIVE BY MIKE KEEGAN: It can also be disclosed that a number of agents, also owed millions, are now considering legal action, which could potentially see winding up petitions against the club.www.dailymail.co.uk
yeah i think we hold the cards with obrien forest are in financial trouble and once they realise theres no way their getting 10m for obrien i think they will weaken 7m would get him imo maybe with some add ons but that is definetly the maximum price we should be paying for him
No they can'tthey could still sell him to us but put it in the deal that he doesnt play at the city ground against us but still think 7m with add ons is the most we should be offering em for him
As I said thenMaybe so Pintor, but we aren’t in the envious position of signing whoever we want. It may well be that circumstances will dictate who we sign and whoever they are ain’t going to please everyone
I would rather go with Hamer but if we get O’Brien it won’t be the end of the World
I think it will be O’Brien but think Forest will only press the button after we’ve played them (18th Aug)
They are just trying to bump his fee upOn the bench today. Can we read anything in to that re availability?
Move on. Get the feeling he doesn' t want to be here. Dkw, we have better targets. F Florist
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?