Kit Vote

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

What style of back do you prefer on our home shirts?


  • Total voters
    387

mattbianco1

Forum Royalty
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Messages
33,935
Reaction score
71,231
Location
Frecheville
Dear Sheffield United FC

Please see the above voting, as taken from the popular forum S24SU.com. There was one question asked, a very simple one, with a choice of 3 answers.

I'm sure you will find the answers quite damning.

Yours faithfully
MB

P.S. people will still buy it in their 100s anyway.
 



Dear Sheffield United FC

Please see the above voting, as taken from the popular forum S24SU.com. There was one question asked, a very simple one, with a choice of 3 answers.

I'm sure you will find the answers quite damning.

Yours faithfully
MB

P.S. people will still buy it in their 100s anyway.


Edit.

Just seen it. Sponsor patch looks shocking, plain white back and no stripes on sleeves. Not the best shirt I've seen.
 
Last edited:
We need someone to contact Utd on our behalf. Someone who has the ear of the co chairmen. Someone who can write letters ......:rolleyes:

Unfortunately, it's too late for that. On sale in 5 days.

Saying that, Le Coq Sportif changed the sleeves on the long sleeved version of our last Premier League kits. They were originally plain but changed them to stripes:

keith-gillespie-sheffield-united-picture-id662005948
keith-gillespie-of-sheffield-united-in-action-during-the-barclays-picture-id71678844
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-6-29_16-44-26.jpeg
    upload_2018-6-29_16-44-26.jpeg
    8.5 KB · Views: 1
Unfortunately, it's too late for that. On sale in 5 days.

Saying that, Le Coq Sportif changed the sleeves on the long sleeved version of our last Premier League kits. They were originally plain but changed them to stripes:

keith-gillespie-sheffield-united-picture-id662005948
keith-gillespie-of-sheffield-united-in-action-during-the-barclays-picture-id71678844
KeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeF
 
This from a River Plate supporter on twitter, in response to the many complaints from our supporters. They have the same template and he is pointing out that they hated theirs at first but actually when you add the numbers and names it doesn't look too bad.

Theirs does have black lettering on the front though which softens the blow a little.

 
After all this fuss, if they do change either the white back or green lettering after they go on sale then make sure you buy one of the originals because I guarantee they will be worth a few quid in years to come and folk will look back and say they were an underappreciated classic :D
 
And FFS is it too hard not to have the sponsor logos in horrendously unsuitable colours?

Just have them in black. Or is that too difficult?
 
This from a River Plate supporter on twitter, in response to the many complaints from our supporters. They have the same template and he is pointing out that they hated theirs at first but actually when you add the numbers and names it doesn't look too bad.

Theirs does have black lettering on the front though which softens the blow a little.


But I don't want a name and number on the back of my shirt because I'm not fucking twelve
 



I dont matter what the kit looks like,its what's inside that matters i heard someone say on another forum,its true,,,,,,,,,,,,,but then i had this flash back.
dean hammond.jpg
 
It really is a shocker. Just wonder who is responsible for giving this the go ahead. Hopefully the club will listen to the fans and make some adjustments.
 
No way should the club make any adjustments to the current monstrosity. They've just saved me over a hundred quid as I won't be buying any for my youngest lads. More beer money for me then. Sorry Utd - you had the chance to take some of my hard earned and failed miserably.
 
I'm not sure what to think. Mine will only cost a tenner next springtime anyway.

In all seriousness and to maximise sales you would have thought there was a channel to guage interest and ideas from the folk that will be buying them :rolleyes:

Shouldn't be difficult to do surely.
 
This new shirt is fucking stupid. It means we can’t wear the famous red and white stripes at places like Leeds, Derby and Bolton for starters. I really really dislike 50% of this shirt.
 
This from a River Plate supporter on twitter, in response to the many complaints from our supporters. They have the same template and he is pointing out that they hated theirs at first but actually when you add the numbers and names it doesn't look too bad.

Theirs does have black lettering on the front though which softens the blow a little.



Yeah but they don't have a green and orange sponsor logo on the back to match the giant shit green logo lettering on the front.
 
Email gone to the commercial dept:

Dear Sir/Madam,

I write this email a little bewildered as to how the new home shirt has been deemed fit for release with a plain white back.

We changed to stripes before everybody's lifetime, in 1894 and in that time have NEVER had a plain white back. We have had two shirts with a plain red back.

Sheffield United play in RED and WHITE, we're the Red and White Wizards, if you ask a neutral what colour we play in the answer is Red, or Red & White. Red is always the first colour associated with our team and it is the most dominant colour. If you speak to folk in different cities, they say "are you Blades or Owls"? or "red or blue?" It's not "Are you White or Blue".

What has happened is we now have a shirt that is WHITE and RED. The main colour is white. This now means we can't wear our traditional kit at places like Leeds United, Derby County or Preston NE, we will be forced to change into our away shirt.

From the front, the green sponsor aside, the shirt looks really nice, the white sleeves are a welcome and unique change to our kit. It's something fresh and new. The stripes are a perfect width and look like a proper blades kit from 50s, 60s and 80s (the 70s were thicker with black introduced). But then you see the back and it's like looking at the back of an away shirt.

I would like you to please answer as to why this was sanctioned by the club without first consulting the Fans? After all, who is the shirt for, other than the fans? They are the ones that you want to market this for aren't they?

If it is Adidas who are calling the shots on a plain back, why isn't it RED, our MAIN colour? Why didn't you consult the fans if they wanted a Red or White back?

If Adidas aren't calling the shots and SUFC had a choice in the matter, why aren't the stripes continued onto the back? The identity of the club has been torn away. Next season we are a team that play in solid white, with 5 red stripes on the front.

Soon after the release, a vote was put up on the blades forum S24SU, as I type this (20:43, 29/06/18) the current voting is as follows:
  • Striped back 161 votes (93%)
  • Red back 7 votes (4%)
  • White back 5 votes (3%)
The voting has been open just 4 hours. Here's the thread - https://s24su.com/forum/index.php?threads/kit-vote.64652/

Read the comments under the official tweet from the club. For every 1 person who likes it, there are 5 questioning the back, or the green sponsor -

Then, compare the comments with last seasons release, hardly any negative comments :

In today's era of social media, It is truly baffling as to how/why, you didn't consult the fans before releasing a plain white back.

Please reconsider changing the back of the kit to stripes, or even a solid red back, if it must be solid.

It's not too late, please do it for the fans, without us, there is no club.

I would appreciate a response as to your thoughts on this matter.

Yours Faithfully
Roger Nilsen
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom