Kozzy_is_my_Dad
No excuses, no dickheads.
- Joined
- May 14, 2015
- Messages
- 10,093
- Reaction score
- 24,008
- Thread starter
- #31
Can we pick them all?
Yes. If you wish.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Can we pick them all?
When I said I didn't like it, especially the back, the lad in the shop said a plain back was a football league stipulation for next season. He didn't sound over convincing though.
Stoke has stripes on the back.
Go back to what I call the Deano kit
And a Deano to go with it.
We are digressing from worst kit to Legends a bit. ( Sighs and drifts back to Oldham away 1990.......and many more.My word, can you imagine what he'd be worth in the current market??
I've voted for stripes on both shirt and sleeves, red on socks and sponsors name black. There is no way the Club will change anything but registering the negativity around the shirt, as its considerable, is important so good luck Kozzy.
The Club can't be blamed for Adidas ridding rough shod over clubs with Stripes but they should seriously consider whether they want to remain with a kit manufacturer that does not take into account the wishes of its customers. Even then whichever genius thought white back and sleeves was preferable to a red back needs to go to specsavers. All it has done is make us look like Derby and Preston when we are attacking the oppositions goal.
Where the Club have scored an own goal is with the Ramsdens logo, the highest score on this poll so far. That is something they could have controlled and avoided the shirt looking like a multi coloured swap shop by insisting Ramsdens continued with the black lettering they were using when they sponsored the Smoggies last season. Sounds like this sponsorship deal was a last minute rush job that will ultimately cost the Club lost revenue in terms of shirt sales.
There may not a lot they can do about it, but it should never have been picked in the first place. The apathetic attitude about there being another one next year is frankly pathetic, the club's colours are part of its identity and having a shirt that laregly rejects that is worth complaining about, otherwise they'll just dish out more white shite in future if everyone just accepts any old crap they call a home kit.
Adidas may have insisted on the plain back, but in the absence of stripes, the most important thing that the club could actually have controlled is to use red numbers. The Adkins kit did at least have red shorts and socks, so despite being non-traditional meant we were at least playing in red and white. This is just white from behind and black numbers and a lack of red trim on the shorts and socks means it looks nothing like United from the back.
One of the plain red-backed shirts had black numbers the first time it appeared at the end of the previous season, but they were replaced with white numbers when it was properly launched so it was still red and white on both sides. There's past form for changing a bad sponsor logo too, with one of the Visit Malta kits swapping from a white box to a black box (the Ramsdens mess would have looked better as a green box with white letters if it had to feature green).
Agree with you both, wholeheartedly - both are good sets of points, well made. It's about bringing it back to what could be changed, within reason perhaps.
It really isn't difficult though, is it? Adidas messed up big time on this one.
Bristol paper has scored this years championship kits. We are described as woeful with 1/10 rating.
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/championship-kits-rated-new-strip-1705976
Out of interest, is last year’s kit still available to buy anywhere?
Out of interest, is last year’s kit still available to buy anywhere?
Tell her she's put the wrong phone number on. Similar to the wrong back on the shirts!!!Well, I've now had a reply from the club, which is pleasing. The only issue is, I'd never expected one so I'm not quite sure what to say now!
View attachment 41488
Tell her she's put the wrong phone number on. Similar to the wrong back on the shirts!!!
I get the impression the club have been selecting black as a cost saving exercise (although they had white for the purple shirt last season) and red would have looked good for both kits if yellow is to be the away shirt colour.
How much cheaper are black numbers compared to red?
Well, I've now had a reply from the club, which is pleasing. The only issue is, I'd never expected one so I'm not quite sure what to say now!
View attachment 41488
Well, I've now had a reply from the club, which is pleasing. The only issue is, I'd never expected one so I'm not quite sure what to say now!
View attachment 41488
Exactly the same price i'd guess. Just you're then buying 2 sets of letters and numbers, thus creating more waste if you don't sell /use them all. If a third kit is created which requires white numbers letters, then that's 3 full sets of different colours If the EFL then change their charity partner (as this year ) or we get promoted we then have to buy into a whole new set of numbers /letters.How much cheaper are black numbers compared to red?
Exactly the same price i'd guess. Just you're then buying 2 sets of letters and numbers, thus creating more waste if you don't sell /use them all. If a third kit is created which requires white numbers letters, then that's 3 full sets of different colours If the EFL then change their charity partner (as this year ) or we get promoted we then have to buy into a whole new set of numbers /letters.
But I think you knew all that already! My main point was that the shirt would have looked much better with red numbers /names due to the distinct lack of red on the back /sleeves of the shirt. Again, I think you knew that already too.
AbsolutelyIf United get promoted to the Premier League I’d say a new bundle of letters in the club shop would be the least of their concerns![]()
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?