UnitedBlade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2012
- Messages
- 3,807
- Reaction score
- 3,972
As I understand it, Derby have to pay an amount to Forest due to a sell-on clause. So they agreed to sell Freeman to us for nothing but charge a loan fee for Bennett. That is why they were linked. Derby wanted to make sure Forest didn't get any money.Seems like everyone's pointing the finger at his agent...what I don't get is the link up with Bennett?
Are they joined at the hip or something??? Was it a B.O.G.O.F???
Seems a bit odd ( if you don't take Freeman off our hands we'll not give you Bennett!?!?) considering both were supposedly really looking to get down here and play...
And then Derby accuse us of messing it up because Freeman/Agent got greedy.